User not logged in - login - register
Home Calendar Books School Tool Photo Gallery Message Boards Users Statistics Advertise Site Info
go to bottom | |
 Message Boards » » MacWorld '08 Page 1 2 3 4 5 [6], Prev  
Fry
The Stubby
7781 Posts
user info
edit post

^ the [words] version of what i meant; pretty well put. the more i read about this the less it seems like an actual issue. personally i just don't see why you would even want frames drawn any significant amount faster than the human eye can detect (aside from benchmarks for advertising) as i would think the preference would be to use the processor for more data (aka an actually faster browsing experience) in the background.

[Edited on February 29, 2008 at 11:33 AM. Reason : ]

2/29/2008 11:32:54 AM

Charybdisjim
All American
5486 Posts
user info
edit post

Heh, maybe the FF people are annoyed because its causing benchmarking on Mac to fail to realistically quantify the relative performance of their browser. The claim of real-world performance issues may be disingenuous and an attempt to give a more compelling reason for apple to release the API's than "we want our software to do better against yours in benchmarks."

2/29/2008 7:54:18 PM

neodata686
All American
11577 Posts
user info
edit post

this is great:
http://tech.yahoo.com/blogs/patterson/14047

3/18/2008 1:14:57 AM

 Message Boards » Tech Talk » MacWorld '08 Page 1 2 3 4 5 [6], Prev  
go to top | |
Admin Options : move topic | lock topic

© 2024 by The Wolf Web - All Rights Reserved.
The material located at this site is not endorsed, sponsored or provided by or on behalf of North Carolina State University.
Powered by CrazyWeb v2.38 - our disclaimer.