Page 7 is next in the war on terror

12/5/2005 9:14:39 AM

http://www.prisonplanet.com/articles/december2005/051205nucleariran.htm

Quote :

"Drudge, Jerusalem Post sensationalize story about nuclear Iran Raw Story | December 5 2005 An article in the Jerusalem Post trumpeted by the conservative Drudge Report grossly sensationalizes the comments of Mohamed El-Baradei, head of the International Atomic Energy Agency. The piece, titled "El Baradei: Iran only months away from a bomb," takes a comment Baradei made to the British newspaper The Independent completely out of context. According to the Independent, Baradei said he wasn't sure if the Iranians were building a nuclear weapon: Did he believe the Iranians were building a nuclear weapon? "The jury's out," he said. "It's difficult to read their intention. We're still going through the programme to make sure it's all for peaceful purposes. "I know they are trying to acquire the full fuel cycle. I know that acquiring the full fuel cycle means that a country is months away from nuclear weapons, and that applies to Iran and everybody else." The Jerusalem Post, meanwhile, turned Baradei on his head -- not only ignoring the fact that he said he wasn't sure Iran was developing a nuclear weapon, but also adding "will" where Baradei had said "could": "IAEA chairman Muhammad ElBaradei on Monday confirmed Israel's assessment that Iran is only a few months away from creating an atomic bomb. If Teheran indeed resumed its uranium enrichment in other plants, as threatened, it will take it only "a few months" to produce a nuclear bomb, El-Baradei told The Independent.""

Lying about Iran's WMD threat?!

But they would never lie about that! And we're gonna find Iraq's WMDs! They didn't lie about that either!

BTW, Drudge is a joo. FYI.


[Edited on December 5, 2005 at 1:21 PM. Reason : `]

12/5/2005 1:20:24 PM

http://www.breitbart.com/news/2005/12/05/051205083904.zkio0mmt.html

Quote :

"Netanyahu hints could consider Iran nuclear strike Dec 05, 2005 Former Israeli prime minister Benjamin Netanyahu hinted that he could consider a pre-emptive air strike against Iran's nuclear installations if he were to be re-elected."

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20051205/ap_on_re_mi_ea/iran_nuclear

Quote :

"Iran Plans to Build Second Nuclear Plant By NASSER KARIMI, Associated Press Writer Mon Dec 5, 8:17 AM ET TEHRAN, Iran - Iran plans to construct a second nuclear power plant despite international concern over its nuclear program, state television reported on Monday."

IT'S NOT A POWER PLANT. IT'S NOOKULAR WEAPONS! SO, WE BETTER INVADE IRAN RIGHT AWAY!

12/5/2005 1:25:50 PM

i have a knee-jerk hope that they DO invade

purely so you'll shut the fuck up

then i remember that christ himself couldn't get you to shut the fuck up

OH HOW WE LOVE PRISONPLANET!!!1

12/5/2005 1:27:38 PM

lol, i hope they are nukes and they destroy the earth just so you all STFU and go to hell.

12/5/2005 1:40:02 PM

dude seriously like number 1, salisburyboy is like wierd or something and number 2, nobody can fuck with america, and number 3 whats wrong with iran providing their citizens with electricity

i'd like to see per capita energy usage of the average iranian versus the average american

just cause they got a bunch of terrorists in the government who would love nothing more than the us to fail, whats us to say just cause we got a democracy that THEY cant have more power

12/5/2005 1:46:52 PM

you live in a dreamworld if you think no one can fuck with america. i mean shit 3 planes crashed and the country is flipped upside down and all its citizens piss their pants at the word terrorist or arab

12/5/2005 3:02:46 PM

how many americans have they killed since their little sucker punch?

how many of the little fucks have we wasted since then?

that's what i thought.

12/5/2005 3:27:34 PM

lol, check again, you thought wrong. How many of you pussies live in fear? How much of a hassle is airport security in the US? How much of a hassle is customs now? How freaked out and panic stricken are people over the stupidest shit? Who's president of the US?


thats what i thought, you lose.

12/5/2005 6:33:46 PM

Quote :

"Who's president of the US?"

He's got ya there.

12/5/2005 6:43:33 PM

airport security? customs?

muhammad please. how many fucking ragheads are scared to death of a cruise fucking missile right now or a 5000 pound bomb?

now go eat some fucking falafel and shut the fuck up.

[Edited on December 5, 2005 at 6:44 PM. Reason : *]

12/5/2005 6:43:40 PM

gonna have to agree w/ 30 cent

12/5/2005 7:03:16 PM

^^none. they aren't affraid to die.

i love the american attitude, makes for a much better fall.

12/6/2005 12:52:18 AM

RIGHT

ALL the women and children and innocent men who have targets walking in their midst aren't afraid to die.

you are a fucking retard.

12/6/2005 9:46:18 AM

^^"the american attitude"?

don't you constantly brag about your material things? didn't you get your good-time-girl pregnant?

stfu about the "american attitude"

just cause your name isn't Jones or Smith doesn't mean you're not a dyed in the wool american

go self loathe or something

12/6/2005 9:56:22 AM

^haha i don't brag about any material things. I'd leave those behind in a heart beat. There are greater things in this world than that, i just so happen to 'enjoy' them while i wait patiently for greater things. and my names Mark kkthx, and i dunno exactly what u mean by 'dyed in the wool american' but whatever u mean, its not me kk.

^^you've got no one but yourselves to blame for being so angry at the world. no need to get your panties in a bunch.




(side note: i'd hvae these material things no matter where i live, well probably nicer material things if i lived in Europe like my bro)

[Edited on December 6, 2005 at 12:46 PM. Reason : fda]

12/6/2005 12:45:39 PM

ok, i get it. he's a guilty american.

12/6/2005 12:47:48 PM

RIGHT

hypocrite

12/6/2005 12:47:53 PM

i'm not american.

12/6/2005 12:53:37 PM

oh but you are

indeed you are

you are more american than apple pie

12/6/2005 12:54:29 PM

um ok if u say so.

oh how i love pushing your little pride buttons...so enjoyable

12/6/2005 12:55:57 PM

http://www.jewishtimes.com/News/5229.stm

Quote :

"AIPAC Blasts White House On Iran Ron Kampeas Special to the Jewish Times DECEMBER 06, 2005 Washington [...] Within days of Rice's interview, the American Israel Public Affairs Committee delivered a rare public criticism of the Bush administration. "Last week's decision allowed Iran to win a critical round in its game of cat-and-mouse with the international community," AIPAC said in an email earlier this week headlined "IMPORTANT -- AIPAC press statement critical of Administration's recent decisions on Iran policy." AIPAC and Israel had hoped that the United States would nudge the International Atomic Energy Agency, the U.N. nuclear watchdog, into referring Iran to the U.N. Security Council last week for sanctions. "

THE JOOZ ARE GETTING ANGRY

12/7/2005 12:10:01 PM

5000 pound bomb?

That's a big damn bomb.

I thought 500 lb was standard.

12/8/2005 1:28:32 PM

http://www.prisonplanet.com/articles/december2005/091205losingpatience.htm

Quote :

"World 'losing patience with Iran' BBC | December 9 2005 The head of the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) has said the world is losing patience with Iran over its nuclear programme. Mohamed ElBaradei, who is in Oslo to receive the Nobel Peace Prize, said outstanding nuclear issues with Iran would be clarified next year. The US and EU suspect Iran of pursuing nuclear weapons but Tehran says its programme is for civilian energy use."

The "world"? Or Zionist "Israel" and the Necons?


http://www.prisonplanet.com/articles/december2005/111205Israel.htm

Quote :

"Israel plans strike on nuclear Iran Sharon tells military to prepare for attack on key sites in March World Net Daily | December 11 2005 Israeli Prime Minister Ariel Sharon has ordered his defense forces to plan for a pre-emptive strike on Iran's nuclear weapons facilities by the end of March – the time intelligence sources say Tehran will be able to begin producing nuclear weapons. The directive came after Iran's President Mahmoud Amadinejad this week suggested Israel should be moved to Europe. Iran has been ignoring warnings from the International Atomic Energy Agency about its plans to continue enriching uranium. In early March, Mohamed El-Baradei, the head of the IAEA, will present his next report on Iran. El-Baradei, who received the Nobel peace prize yesterday, warned that the world was "losing patience" with Iran. Defense sources in Israel believe the end of March to be the "point of no return," after which Iran will have the technical expertise to enrich uranium in sufficient quantities to build a nuclear warhead in two to four years. "

12/12/2005 8:20:13 AM

does Mohamed El Baradei sound like a zionist jew name to you?

OH HOW WE LOVE PRISONPLANET!!!1

12/12/2005 8:41:16 AM

right, it's not even remotely possible that non-j00z could be manipulated to promote the j00z' agenda

bush, cheney, and the non-jews in congress....it could NEVER happen

Oh, by the way, Hans Blix is of j00ish ancestry

12/12/2005 8:47:50 AM

Quote :

"right, it's not even remotely possible that non-j00z could be manipulated to promote the j00z' agenda"

right, and it's not even remotely possible that iran is trying to produce nuclear weapons

12/12/2005 8:59:10 AM

12/12/2005 9:01:40 AM

Quote :

"does Mohamed El Baradei sound like a zionist jew name to you?"

Just because it's "non-jewish" sounding name doesn't mean he isn't in fact a joo. There are several possibilities. He may be a joo who just happens to have a "non-jewish" name. He could have a jewish mother, and a non-jewish father. Or, he could have changed his name.

There are at least 290,000 Iraqi-born Jews, for example:

http://www.israelnationalnews.com/news.php3?id=94655

Quote :

"290,000 Israelis Eligible to Vote in Iraqi Elections Jews around the world who were born in Iraq are eligible to vote in the Iraqi elections taking place this week. [...] Anybody holding Iraqi citizenship, whether he/she was born in Iraq, or was born to an Iraqi father, is eligible to vote, according to Iraqi law. An estimated 290,000 Israelis are therefore eligible to vote."

12/13/2005 8:55:24 AM

http://www.upi.com/SecurityTerrorism/view.php?StoryID=20051230-112208-8968r

Quote :

"German media: U.S. prepares Iran strike By MARTIN WALKER UPI Editor WASHINGTON, Dec. 30 (UPI) -- The Bush administration is preparing its NATO allies for a possible military strike against suspected nuclear sites in Iran in the New Year, according to German media reports, reinforcing similar earlier suggestions in the Turkish media."

U.S. Warns Turkey Of Air Strike On Iran And Syria
http://www.prisonplanet.com/articles/december2005/211205uswarns.htm

London Guardian--Why, six years ago, did the CIA give the Iranians blueprints to build a bomb?
http://prisonplanet.com/articles/january2006/060106Iran_bomb.htm

Whoops. Guess it was all just a "big mistake." Kind of like how the U.S. government sold arms to Saddam and how NORAD stood down on 9/11. Is the government just totally incompetent? Oh well, just increase their funding by a few billion. It's not like they do this stuff intentionally for strategic purposes. No way.

Why have both the US and the UK given Iran the materials it needs to go nuclear?
http://prisonplanet.com/articles/january2006/090106Iran.htm


[Edited on January 9, 2006 at 12:51 PM. Reason : `]

1/9/2006 12:47:31 PM

did you notice the near month long gap of no posts? stop wasting your time.

1/10/2006 10:31:46 AM

fiction for now..

Day One - The War With Iran
http://www.rense.com/general69/dayone.htm


[Edited on January 10, 2006 at 10:38 AM. Reason : `]

1/10/2006 10:34:47 AM

now you're posting entire works of fiction

gg

1/10/2006 11:26:29 AM

Gearing Up For War with Iran; U.S. Air Force dispatched additional warplanes to region
http://www.washtimes.com/national/20060112-113400-5198r_page2.htm

Quote :

"WASHINGTON TIMES | January 13, 2006 By Bill Gertz and Rowan Scarborough Fighters deploy Coinciding with increased tensions with Iran over the resumption of illicit uranium enrichment, the U.S. Air Force has dispatched additional warplanes to the region in a not-so-subtle sign, military sources say. An entire wing of F-16s, the Air National Guard's 122nd Fighter Wing based in Fort Wayne, Ind., left for a base in southwest Asia on Tuesday. A wing is usually about 72 aircraft and several hundred support personnel. F-16s and support personnel from the 4th Fighter Squadron of the 388th Fighter Wing based at Hill Air Force Base, Utah, also deployed recently to Iraq. The squadron has 12 F-16s. Both units' F-16s could be used in any military operation to take out Iranian nuclear facilities. A spokesman for the U.S. Central Command Air Forces, which runs air operations in the region, said the F-16 deployment of about 80 jets is part of a rotation and is not related to Iran's uranium reprocessing."

http://www.forbes.com/markets/feeds/afx/2006/01/13/afx2447977.html

Quote :

"UK's Straw says consensus growing for action on Iran 01.13.2006 LONDON (AFX) - A consensus is growing among the international community, including Russia, for action to tackle Iran's nuclear programme, British Foreign Secretary Jack Straw said today. "

http://www.cnn.com/2006/WORLD/meast/01/12/iran.nuclear/index.html

Quote :

"U.S. backs Europe over nuclear Iran Friday, January 13, 2006 BERLIN, Germany (CNN) -- Britain, France and Germany have called for the U.N.'s nuclear watchdog to refer Iran to the Security Council over the country's atomic ambitions."

Iran Threatens to Block U.N. Inspections
http://www.nytimes.com/aponline/international/AP-Iran-Nuclear.html?hp&ex=1137214800&en=ea05229a586b71a4&ei=5094&partner=homepage

Israel's new confidence in attack on Iran nukes
http://www.prisonplanet.com/articles/january2006/130106Israel_Iran.htm


It's the same old story, just as they did with Iraq. Make up some lies, go before the UN to attempt to give the action legitimacy, and prepare to attack. Only this time it's Iran's nuclear power plant, and the Zionists are lying and claiming they have (or are trying to get) nuclear weapons. And EVEN IF Iran wants to get nuclear weapons, SO WHAT? The Zionists or anybody else has no right to say Iran can't acquire nuclear weapons.

But unlike with Iraq, it's blatantly obvious now to more and more people what's going on. People are onto the Zionists tricks. They're cooking all this fuss up in order to serve as the pretext for another war of aggression against a country that is not complying with their plans for a new world order.

1/13/2006 2:22:37 PM

why are you so sure that iran is NOT trying to get nuclear weapons?

1/13/2006 2:29:51 PM

Why do you believe the Zionists? They intentionally lied to trick us to go to war with Iraq. What makes you think they're telling the truth this time?

1/13/2006 2:37:25 PM

look i could lie to your face today
and tell you the truth tomorrow

unless you know one from the other, you're sol. now even if you believe that all that information previously was "lies", how do you know that this set of information is all "lies"?

you have provided nothing proving that iran is pursuing peaceful technology only.

[Edited on January 13, 2006 at 3:14 PM. Reason : *]

1/13/2006 3:14:28 PM

Quote :

"you have provided nothing proving that iran is pursuing peaceful technology only"

What evidence have the Zionists provided proving that Iran does have nuclear weapons or is definitely about to produce nuclear weapons? Why don't you place the burden on the Zionists who are pushing for war?

What is this? Guilty until proven innocent? Are we to attack any nation we want to that doesn't "prove" to us they don't have nulcear weapons?

And even if Iran was trying to get nuclear weapons, so what? Why do we have the right to tell a sovereign nation that they can't get these weapons?

1/13/2006 3:30:58 PM

look even the germans and the fucking french think tehran is up to no good. there's satellite evidence and reports coming from un inspectors and all sorts of shit that indicate this.

there is NOTHING to indicate the opposite. the fact that they refuse to be forthwith here is awfully telling as well.

[Edited on January 13, 2006 at 4:11 PM. Reason : *]

1/13/2006 4:11:05 PM

http://www.jpost.com/servlet/Satellite?cid=1136361080268&pagename=JPost%2FJPArticle%2FShowFull

Quote :

"Bush: Israel threatened by Iran Jan. 14, 2006 US President George Bush warned Friday that if Iran goes forward with its nuclear program, it might pose a "grave threat to the security of the world." After a meeting with German Chancellor Angela Merkel at the White House, Bush voiced his concern over Iran's decision to pursue uranium enrichment and used the same language he used before launching the American attack against Iraq."

Just like with Iraq! Well, we know how honest they were there! IRAQ HAS WMDS! THEY POSE AN "IMMEDIATE" THREAT! SEND OUR BOYS TO DIE FOR ISRAEL FAST!

Bush Iran Intends to Nuke Israel
http://www.prisonplanet.com/articles/january2006/150106Israel.htm

Russian Expert Says Israel Likely to Bomb Iran in Spring
http://www.prisonplanet.com/articles/january2006/150106Israel_Iran.htm

1/15/2006 3:46:55 PM

eh, he probably used the same wording with N. Korea as well.

1/15/2006 3:56:28 PM

Quote :

"you have provided nothing proving that iran israel is has been pursuing peaceful technology only for the past 20 years"

oh but that is ok, because those bloody zionists are as blue-eyed and blond-haired as americans and europeans!

1/15/2006 6:03:27 PM

http://www.prisonplanet.com/articles/january2006/160106militaryaction.htm

Quote :

"US Must Be Willing To Take Military Action Against Iran: McCain AFP | January 16 2006 Washington should be prepared to take military action if necessary against Iran, a senior US lawmaker said Sunday, calling the standoff over Tehran's nuclear program the biggest international crisis in more than a decade. "The military option is the last option but cannot be taken off of the table," US Senator John McCain said. "This is the most grave situation that we have faced since the end of the Cold War, absent the whole war on terror," the Republican lawmaker told CBS television's "Face the Nation" program. McCain said even the the massive military commitments in Iraq should not allow the United States to rule out responding with force against Iran. "We are tied up to a great degree. But that does not mean that we don't have military options," McCain said. He added that such measures should only be resorted to after peaceful methods have been exhausted, including immediate UN action. "We must go to the UN now for sanctions," McCain said. [...] Asked it Iran posed a greater threat to US security than Iraq, McCain said: "I think at this time clearly it does." "Now, the difference between Iraq and Iran is that Saddam Hussein had us all fooled, including his own generals, about having weapons of mass destruction. I think it's pretty clear in the mind of any expert that Iranians are about to acquire them," he said."

OMFG!!!!!!!!1111!

The biggest international crisis in more than a decade! Even more dangerous than Iraq, which had no WMDs and posed no threat at all! Holy Shit!! This is truly a grave situation people! And they're not lying about the threat this time, like they did with Iraq when they deliberately tricked us into going to war. This time they're telling the truth. Really. It's SO CLEAR that Iran is about to acquire WMDs! Don't believe me? Well, Bush, the Necons, the Zionists, and even the "experts" (whoever they are) said so. Just like before the Iraq war! So there. Case closed.

INVADE IRAN RIGHT NOW OR THE TERRORISTS WIN!!!!111


[Edited on January 17, 2006 at 8:39 AM. Reason : `]

1/17/2006 8:35:55 AM

http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article11572.htm

Quote :

"More Lies about Iran By Mike Whitney 01/15/06 "ICH" -- -- There’s been a lot of rubbish written about Iran’s “removing the seals” from its uranium enrichment equipment. The fear-mongering western media have exploited the expression for all its worth. Even those who are normally skeptical of the Bush-propaganda machine are taken aback by this ominous-sounding phrase. What gibberish! How else does one make nuclear fuel for electric power plants if the fuel-producing mechanism is under lock and key? The fear-engendering description provided in the news would have the reader believe that “diabolical” Iranians are ripping off the seals with crowbars so they can quickly assemble their secret nuclear stockpile to bomb Tel Aviv. This is the worse type of demagoguery. The fuel that is produced from these uranium enrichment reactors DOES NOT PRODUCE WEAPONS-GRADE MATERIAL. That requires thousands of centrifuges which Iran does not have. At the same time, the nuclear watchdog agency, the IAEA, has on-site inspectors and cameras monitoring the entire process. Everything is under constant observation. Additionally, as nuclear weapons physicist, Gordon Prather states, “After almost three years of go-anywhere see-anything interview-anyone inspections, IAEA inspectors have yet to find any indication that Iran has—or ever had—a nuclear weapons program”. Get it??? No nukes! Not now…not ever! The public has been duped again by the intentionally misleading rhetoric and blatant lies of the MSM and the Bush administration to build the case for war with Iran. What could be more clear?"

Security Council powers near consensus on Iran
http://today.reuters.com/news/newsArticle.aspx?type=fundLaunches&storyID=2006-01-16T173328Z_01_FOR172289_RTRUKOC_0_US-NUCLEAR-IRAN.xml


Strap yourselves in.


[Edited on January 17, 2006 at 9:37 AM. Reason : `]

1/17/2006 9:37:07 AM

Can we get some proof (other than your lovely internet rants) that these are lies?

And please explain:

They were wrong about Iraq, so now you never trust them.

Prisonplanet was wrong about keystroke loggers, yet you still turn to them for your news.

1/17/2006 10:24:00 AM

Quote :

"Can we get some proof (other than your lovely internet rants) that these are lies? "

Can we get some proof that the government is telling the truth about Iran?

After all, they lied before about Iraq. Don't you think the burden of proof is on them to prove they are telling the truth before they try to sell us another war?

[Edited on January 17, 2006 at 10:56 AM. Reason : `]

1/17/2006 10:55:15 AM

answer a question with a question. common smear tactic, isnt it?

1/17/2006 10:56:02 AM

troll away brian and joshua

that's what you do when you don't have any rational argument to make, eh?

[Edited on January 17, 2006 at 10:59 AM. Reason : `]

1/17/2006 10:56:34 AM

Quote :

"Don't you think the burden of proof is on them to prove they are telling the truth before they try to sell us another war?"

Regardless, the governments of the world have more credibility than you or any of your sources. If you expose the truth you will have my support, but you won't win anyone's opinion by blindly stating that the government is lying with absolutely no proof to back it up.

Quote :

"And please explain: They were wrong about Iraq, so now you never trust them. Prisonplanet was wrong about keystroke loggers, yet you still turn to them for your news."

But it looks like we're already at the point where you dismiss anyone who questions you and call them names. Again, you maturity is impressive.

1/17/2006 11:06:00 AM

i'd the think the burden of proof would be on iran.

i mean seriously. if they're not trying to get nuclear weapons, why not open up the UN and be completely transparent about it?

1/17/2006 11:06:27 AM