grenade launchers would also damage public property dumbass, also collateral injury

as would the operation of tanks on roads that arent maintained for tank use

god dammit boy

[Edited on November 10, 2008 at 1:10 PM. Reason : s]

11/10/2008 1:09:04 PM

i am the reason! LoL, damn....

U mad?

I am sorry I am now a rapist. You don't even make sense.

11/10/2008 1:09:27 PM

i didnt say you were, you have the 5th amendment right to not incriminate yourself

11/10/2008 1:10:32 PM

Sweet Jesus--and some of you call conservatives ignorant? I'm outta this shitfest.

11/10/2008 1:11:20 PM

You have pretty much said everything. I just hope you never go into business or advertising. Also please never run for office, the other person running against you might use a strategy to get people to vote for them and that would confuse you.

11/10/2008 1:12:46 PM

and i hope you never decide to get a little drunk and rowdy at a baby shower

given all the women there that would most likely kick your ass

11/10/2008 1:14:54 PM

where are you coming up with this shit lol?

11/10/2008 1:16:20 PM

Quote :

"where are you coming up with this shit lol?"

THE SAME PLACE YOU ARE SON.

11/10/2008 1:17:42 PM

i just pulled outta my arse completely

11/10/2008 1:17:56 PM

Quote :

"grenade launchers would also damage public property dumbass, also collateral injury as would the operation of tanks on roads that arent maintained for tank use god dammit boy"

bullets don't damage public property?

11/10/2008 1:24:43 PM

well lets see...


yo booboo breath does more damage to public property but no one has banned your diaphragm

[Edited on November 10, 2008 at 1:32 PM. Reason : dammit]

11/10/2008 1:25:17 PM

God GETS OFF ON BEING STUPIDLY DENSE.

IT'S RATHER INTERESTING TO ANALYZE FROM A PSYCHOLOGICAL STANDPOINT.

11/10/2008 1:25:33 PM

Quote :

"yo booboo breath does more damage to public property but no one has banned your diaphragm"

Are you seriously comparing bullet damage to breathing?

Would you rather I fire off a few rounds at your car or breathe on it?

11/10/2008 1:35:59 PM

WHY DON'T YOU GO BREATHE A MIXTURE OF AMMONIA AND BLEACH SON.

THX BYE.

11/10/2008 1:38:10 PM

lol


id rather you not breathe in my face thats for sure

11/10/2008 1:39:14 PM

I so want a tank now. King of the Hill ftw...

11/10/2008 1:41:22 PM

The line has to be drawn somewhere. What is acceptable to carry and what isn't?

11/10/2008 1:50:39 PM

regardless of what/where the line is, criminals are still going to ignore it

11/10/2008 1:51:31 PM

^^ IF YOU CAN'T GRASP THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN BULLETS, GRENADES AND ARTILLERY THEN NO SATISFACTORY ANSWER CAN BE GIVEN TO YOUR QUESTION.

THE OTHER ISSUE IS THAT YOU AREN'T GENUINELY INTERESTED IN RECEIVING ANSWERS. YOU WANT PEOPLE TO RESPOND IN A CERTAIN WAY SO YOU CAN ATTACK THEM WITH YOUR ABSOLUTELY PATHETIC VIEWS ON REALITY.

11/10/2008 1:52:22 PM

I actually agree with you SAAB

11/10/2008 1:54:01 PM

ideally I'd like to eliminate as many handguns as possible but before something like this would be done, there would have to be a lot of other steps to get the guns off the streets

11/10/2008 2:12:10 PM

^ALL I HAVE TO SAY TO THAT IS:

1. YOU'RE FUCKING RETARDED.

2. HAVE YOU EVER HEARD OF THE "WAR ON DRUGS" AND IF SO, HOW WILL THIS TURN OUT DIFFERENTLY? THE REALITY IS THAT THE LAWS YOU WANT TO ENACT WOULD ONLY TEND TO REMOVE GUNS FROM LAW ABIDING CITIZENS, JUST LIKE DRUG LAWS ONLY TEND TO DISCOURAGE LAW ABIDING CITIZENS FROM USING DRUGS. ALL YOU'LL DO IS CREATE A MASSIVE ILLEGAL ARMS MARKET. SO NOW, INSTEAD OF MOSTLY BRINGING IN DRUGS, CARTELS AND SHIT WILL SHIP WEAPONS OVER AS WELL. THEY DON'T GET LITTLE LEFT WING PANSY "ASSAULT WEAPONS" EITHER, THEY GET THE REAL DEAL.

3. WHY IS IT HANDGUNS THAT YOU'RE FOCUSING ON? HANDGUNS ARE THE MOST INACCURATE AS WELL AS THE LEAST LETHAL TYPE OF FIREARM. THAT MAKES NO FUCKING SENSE DUDE. YOU'RE JUST SAYING THIS BECAUSE A BUNCH OF LEFT WING IDIOTS AND MEDIA GOONS HAVE GONE NUTS ABOUT HANDGUNS AND "ASSAULT WEAPONS" WHILE AIMLESSLY AND INCORRECTLY THROWING AROUND A BUNCH OF STUPID WORDS LIKE "AUTOMATIC."

YOU WILL ALSO ENCOURAGE TWO VERY NEGATIVE THINGS BY ENACTING SUCH REGULATIONS. THE FIRST WILL BE MORE CRIMINAL ACTIVITY (BECAUSE THEY KNOW VICTIMS ARE PRETTY MUCH GUARANTEED TO BE UNARMED). THE SECOND WILL BE THE BEGINNINGS OF A DANGEROUS POLICE STATE BECAUSE THE GOVERNMENT WILL HAVE TO ACCEPT MORE AND MORE POWER AND RESPONSIBILITY FOR CITIZENS SAFETY (AND IF THEY DON'T THEN YOU WILL HAVE TO BUY WEAPONS AND BECOME A CRIMINAL YOURSELF). THIS WILL LEAD TO MORE AND MORE POLICE WITH MORE AND MORE POWER OVER THE AVERAGE CITIZEN.

(IT'S ALSO WORTH NOTING THAT THE DRUG WAR IS COMPLETELY RETARDED.)

11/10/2008 2:13:24 PM

Quote :

"THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN BULLETS"

but what bullets?

Long range sniper rifles? .50 caliber? Automatic sub machine guns? What's acceptable for defense and what isn't?

11/10/2008 2:26:42 PM

Quote :

"^^ IF YOU CAN'T GRASP THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN BULLETS, GRENADES AND ARTILLERY THEN NO SATISFACTORY ANSWER CAN BE GIVEN TO YOUR QUESTION. THE OTHER ISSUE IS THAT YOU AREN'T GENUINELY INTERESTED IN RECEIVING ANSWERS. YOU WANT PEOPLE TO RESPOND IN A CERTAIN WAY SO YOU CAN ATTACK THEM WITH YOUR ABSOLUTELY PATHETIC VIEWS ON REALITY."

11/10/2008 2:27:51 PM

God you're a fucking retard..


It doesn't matter what the weapon is... if its intended use is unlawful ... then why does the gun have to be lawful?

All your dumbfuck laws limit are honest redneck toys like i have...

11/10/2008 2:28:43 PM

wow. I never thought I'd see so much stupid.

11/10/2008 2:32:34 PM

Agreed Bill.

11/10/2008 2:35:23 PM

what's funny is you can have a tank in england, you just have to paint the whole thing yellow

11/10/2008 2:37:49 PM

God the intent of the 2nd amendment is so that the government would have to fear the common man...

There should honestly be no limit to what you can purchase lawfully by the original intent...
It was made so that when the army had black power rifles you could too...
Now they have automatic machine guns, tanks, airplanes helicopters etc... if they wanted to impart martial law against our will we couldn't stop them....

The point was so that we could "refresh" our government if it needed to be done again just as they had recently finished doing.

11/10/2008 2:41:57 PM

Quote :

"wow. I never thought I'd see so much stupid. "

11/10/2008 2:43:20 PM

11/10/2008 2:44:40 PM

NOT WATCHING.

11/10/2008 2:45:55 PM

Quote :

"The purpose of fighting is to win. There is no possible victory in defense. . . .waiting for attack! The sword is more important than the shield, and skill is more important than either. The final weapon is the brain. All else is supplemental. 1. Don't pick a fight with an old man. If he is too old to fight, he'll just kill you. 2. If you find yourself in a fair fight, your tactics are wrong. 3. I carry a gun because a cop is too heavy. 4. When seconds count, the cops are just minutes away. 5. A reporter did a human-interest piece on the Texas Rangers. The reporter recognized the Colt Model 1911 the Ranger was carrying and asked him 'Why do you carry a ..45?' The Ranger responded, 'Because they don't make a .46.' 6. The old sheriff was attending an awards dinner when a lady commented on his wearing his sidearm. 'Sheriff, I see you have your pistol. Are you expecting trouble?' 'No Ma'am. If I were expecting trouble, I would have brought my rifle.' 7. Beware the man who only has one gun. HE PROBABLY KNOWS HOW TO USE IT!!! But wait, there's more! I was once asked by a lady visiting if I had a gun in the house. I said I did. She said 'Well I certainly hope it isn't loaded!' To which I said, of course it is loaded, can't work without bullets!' She then asked, 'Are you that afraid of someone evil coming into your house?' My reply was, 'No not at all. I am not afraid of the house catching fire either, but I have fire extinguishers around, and they are all loaded too.' To which I'll add, having a gun in the house that isn't loaded is like having a car in the garage without gas in the tank. "

11/10/2008 2:50:31 PM

lol@^

11/10/2008 2:52:50 PM

HOLD ON A SECOND MR. FIRE, I NEED TO LOAD THE FIRE EXTINGUISHER!!!

HANG ON A SECOND VIOLENT CRIMINAL, I NEED TO LOAD THE SHOTGUN!!!

11/10/2008 2:53:33 PM

EXCUSE ME MISTER MURDERER. PLEASE ALLOW ME TO SIT DOWN WITH YOU AND DISCUSS OUR PROCEEDINGS OVER A CUP OF TEA. I AM SURE THAT THROUGH A GENTLEMANLY DIALOGUE WE WILL ENABLE OURSELVES TO FORGO OUR DIFFERENCES.



[Edited on November 10, 2008 at 2:57 PM. Reason : damn changing thoughts mid sentence ]

11/10/2008 2:56:21 PM

now i still haven't figured out why less lethal amo is illegal...

I personally would like a shot gun loaded with a

1 bean bag.
1 rubber bullet
1 salt shot
fill rest with buck shot.

that way i don't have to kill the guy... but i can...

11/10/2008 2:56:59 PM

SET'EM UP

11/10/2008 2:58:58 PM

punchmonk


that video was not as good as i thought it would be, i thought the kid would like try to shoot or something lol

[Edited on November 10, 2008 at 3:00 PM. Reason : .]

11/10/2008 3:00:06 PM

dammit. you bloke.

11/10/2008 3:00:22 PM

Quote :

"There should honestly be no limit to what you can purchase lawfully by the original intent... It was made so that when the army had black power rifles you could too... Now they have automatic machine guns, tanks, airplanes helicopters etc... if they wanted to impart martial law against our will we couldn't stop them...."

Hahaha, here we go...

We need to stop the "impending Zionist police state" right?

And why don't you run a country where you let any Average Joe purchase tanks, airplanes, and helicopters if he has the money, and let me know how it goes.

11/10/2008 3:48:28 PM

i have no problem with that

survival of the fittest, bitch

11/10/2008 3:49:31 PM

Quote :

"And why don't you run a country where you let any Average Joe purchase tanks, airplanes, and helicopters if he has the money, and let me know how it goes."

UM, WE CAN ALREADY BUY "TANKS," AIRPLANES AND HELICOPTERS IF WE HAVE THE MONEY. THEY JUST CAN'T BE EQUIPPED WITH PROHIBITED WEAPONS.

11/10/2008 3:49:41 PM

Quote :

"but what bullets? Long range sniper rifles? .50 caliber? Automatic sub machine guns?"

lol

please, keep posting firearm details, i'm sure the other people who actually know about firearms are getting a kick out of your ignorance

11/10/2008 3:54:08 PM

Quote :

"now i still haven't figured out why less lethal amo is illegal... I personally would like a shot gun loaded with a 1 bean bag. 1 rubber bullet 1 salt shot fill rest with buck shot. that way i don't have to kill the guy... but i can..."

You can only hurt someone in self defense and if your intent isn't to kill them then obviously you weren't in enough danger to justify hurting them in the first place.

Imagine how much you'd be butt raped by a lawyer if you shot an intruder in the eye with a beanbag and permanently blinded them.
Even worse, imagine you shoot a beanbag at an intruder who'd hopped up on Mountain Dew. He doesn't react to the beanbag and suddenly you find yourself wrestling with him over your shotgun. He could take it from you and shoot you with it.

Quote :

"please, keep posting firearm details, i'm sure the other people who actually know about firearms are getting a kick out of your ignorance"

The ignorance is astounding.

You know...Obama has stated he'd like to ban all armor piercing ammunition.
Apparently he doesn't know every goddamn deer rifle in the US is armor piercing.
You can go as small as the 22 magnum and still penetrate threat level iii armor.

[Edited on November 10, 2008 at 3:56 PM. Reason : ]

11/10/2008 3:54:12 PM

yeah, but that's personal choice.

11/10/2008 3:56:48 PM

What's personal choice?

11/10/2008 3:57:36 PM

^ What ammo to use.

If you're willing to risk using LTL ammo in your 12 gauge then go for it. You still can't use it legally unless there's a deadly threat, but that most definitely IS your choice to use LTL projectiles instead of standard "lethal" lead projectiles....

11/10/2008 3:59:10 PM

Quote :

"Even worse, imagine you shoot a beanbag at an intruder who'd hopped up on Mountain Dew. He doesn't react to the beanbag and suddenly you find yourself wrestling with him over your shotgun. He could take it from you and shoot you with it."

that's your chance to take. if it's legal to shoot him with a bullet it should be legal to shoot him with something less lethal than a bullet.

[Edited on November 10, 2008 at 4:00 PM. Reason : ^exactly]

11/10/2008 3:59:50 PM

Quote :

"You know...Obama has stated he'd like to ban all armor piercing ammunition. Apparently he doesn't know every goddamn deer rifle in the US is armor piercing. You can go as small as the 22 magnum and still penetrate threat level iii armor."

Oh, he knows... He knows...
But most on Capital Hill don't. Therefore, if he gets legislation on his desk (by Pilosi and Reid), he'll rubber stamp that QUICK...

11/10/2008 4:01:34 PM