ok what's the deal with thewolfweb.com watermark on my photos? please stop watermarking my photos... please!!!

and maybe we could have our own user 'icon' like AIM, right under our name
maybe only 20x20 to keep the load time fast or something...

10/10/2001 4:44:51 AM

They're properly called avatars. Twenty square pixels is way too small. A good upper limit would be 100 x 100.

10/10/2001 12:05:15 PM

Oh, and I think it goes without saying that only PREMIUM users should get avatars. Either that, or have a standard set of avatars for regular users to choose from while allowing premium users to upload their own.

10/10/2001 12:06:13 PM

Pros: i already bitched about this:

http://www.thewolfweb.com/message_topic.aspx?topic=21263

10/10/2001 12:35:03 PM

watermarks are here to stay. Sorry, but if you don't like it, nobody is forcing you to let tww host your pictures. Plus theres a way around it.

Second, avatars are fucking STUPID.

Especially on a message board where the overwhelming majority of posts are 1 line comments that don't even take up the whole table cell to begin with. Increasing the size of the cell to accomadate some stupid picture would make it even more inefficent and stupid.

Of course, this is just my opinion.

10/10/2001 1:45:38 PM

Yeah I think the avatar deal is kinda retarded. I mean, you do have a photo gallery.

And while we're on the issue... Upload your pics as GIFs.

the_drew

10/10/2001 2:08:05 PM

what maugan said.

10/10/2001 3:12:29 PM

10/10/2001 3:20:38 PM

I agree with ironmike.

10/10/2001 5:24:18 PM

a windows icon is 32x32. 20x20 is pretty small.

32x64 tall not long would be a good size to put on the right side of the left column

10/13/2001 2:42:23 AM

I just measured, and on my computer a one line post has exactly 76 pixels between the white lines vertically.

I was right, 64 is a good height

10/13/2001 2:47:36 AM