someone is gonna talk to me

i want to know why, so tell me why?

if you have a personal vendetta, we can settle it without you screwin me out of my money

you wont keep me in the dark, just because im not one of your happy little veteran friends that will kiss your asses

gimme an answer, ive contacted you three ways privately, and i got no response so im takin it to the street

10/28/2004 2:41:08 AM

what do you have to do to get suspended?

that came out wrong....how does one get suspended?

[Edited on October 28, 2004 at 3:13 AM. Reason : asdf]

10/28/2004 3:10:22 AM

apparently not being in good with the mods is a way to be suspended

10/28/2004 3:14:27 AM

I want to know why highroller was suspended if you said we can make our own threads and pic bomb them

10/28/2004 3:32:30 AM

he was suspended too?

wtf man

sparky told him that was cool

10/28/2004 3:40:51 AM

chris, nigga, i warned you like a day before not to pic bomb and to just take it easy so you didnt get suspended

i cant say i didnt see this coming


THAT SAID, FREE Crawdaddy65

10/28/2004 5:20:35 AM

[Edited on October 28, 2004 at 5:45 AM. Reason : ]

10/28/2004 5:44:09 AM

10/28/2004 5:50:17 AM

10/28/2004 6:14:28 AM

god scrumples makes me lolercaust all over myself sometimes

10/28/2004 6:20:56 AM

what was your original s/n?

10/28/2004 8:18:36 AM

i don't know guys. the mods are all different people with different opinions. just because i don't see something as a suspendable offense doesn't mean that one of the other mods might. all the mods agreed that pic bombing wasn't right and i think you guys will agree, but the particulars weren't talked about. i made a statement based on what i felt was fair without consulting the other mods and i should not have done that since it is obvious some of the other mods disagree.

10/28/2004 8:54:52 AM

I suspended you.

Padding/pic bombing/generally trying to kill threads:
message_topic.aspx?topic=260134&page=1

Admitting that you're trying to kill threads:
message_topic.aspx?topic=260142&page=1#5472536

If you think you can argue that what you were doing was technically not pic bombing since you only posted one image per post, don't bother. You know what you were doing.

message_topic.aspx?topic=259389&page=3#5467642

Quote :

"theres ways around it"

So, you can keep trying to push the line if you want, and i'm certain that CrazyJ won't more $5 donations to the site, or you can stop being a jackass. Your call.

End of discussion.

10/28/2004 9:37:08 AM

there you go....good point bobby!!!

10/28/2004 10:05:23 AM

posting the same thing over & over in a thread is also called padding

& people used to get suspened for it non stop

10/28/2004 10:32:04 AM

hey bobbydigital, i'm sure i'm going to be pissing in the wind by even trying this, but have you ever considered that you can achieve the same end without stirring up so much shit?

no, scratch that, i'm sure you have, you're just trying to push the line for how much shit you can stir up in the name of righteous moderation, right?

hypocrite.

10/28/2004 1:09:27 PM

free FREAKJOB2004

10/28/2004 1:48:07 PM

I think that Crazy J and Joe should be the only people with suspension powers
I got no beef with Marko or Sparky, and I don't know BobbyD so I could give a fuck about him, but I feel that if you post on here (such as the above named mods) you should not have suspension powers. I feel that you mods may be partisan when it comes to certain posters and have beef with other posters. Any other board I have been a moderator at didn't allow us mods to suspend, that was left up to the board admins. It was because most of the regular posters were friends with the some of the mods.

just my .02

10/28/2004 4:58:28 PM

Eh, he got what was coming to him. GG mods for backing each other up

.02

10/28/2004 5:06:00 PM

I think partisan politics come into play on certain situations

10/28/2004 5:09:55 PM

got an example?

10/28/2004 5:29:28 PM

I should say "could" come into play

because we have everyday posters who are mods here, and they happen to be friends with alot of the posters on here

10/28/2004 6:20:15 PM

well since crazyj & joe don't spend much time (if any) on tww every day it makes sense to give other people suspension powers

one possible change could be something like suspend by comititee, 3 mods have to agree or something worthless like that

either way, picture bombing & padding are both clearly against the rules

10/28/2004 6:32:58 PM

but the rules are not applied evenly

see kontalonis as an example

[Edited on October 28, 2004 at 6:38 PM. Reason : ...]

10/28/2004 6:38:04 PM

^bingo

10/28/2004 6:38:53 PM

10/28/2004 6:55:37 PM

I think mods more or less gives everyone the benefit of the doubt and that if you wanted them to lock down on everyone that breaks the rules, you'd really be crying for their heads, whining that they're power hungry and unfair and that you should have more leeway. Half of T-dub could find themselves suspended.

I mean, if you're going to have a history of bad behavior, it only makes you easier to come after. It's sort of like being a convicted felon. The rules don't apply the same to you once you screw it up the first time. If you mess up even a little bit, cops will bring the house down on them. Crawdaddy has been notorious for this crap, and it's easier to suspend him since he's done it before and obviously doesn't know how to stop.

I'm sure there are other instances with other people where this isn't the case. Mods to have lives...they can't watch everything that is going on. They don't want to seem like Nazis and take away all of your posting freedoms. They're needed to keep the order around here, and I think they're doing a pretty good job.

10/28/2004 7:22:00 PM