drunknloaded Suspended 147487 Posts user info edit post |
samsung x497- 30 dollars after 30 dollar mail in rebate LG C1500- 30 dollars after 30 dollar mir lg c1300i- 19.99 sony ericsson z500a- free after 50 dollar mail in rebate motorola v180- free lg c1300i(refurb)- free
thanks very much in advance for any help 9/16/2005 3:12:35 PM |
HaLo All American 14273 Posts user info edit post |
not the v180. the ringer and vibrate suck so much ass. I'm downgrading to my old nokia 3500 9/16/2005 4:22:31 PM |
30thAnnZ Suspended 31803 Posts user info edit post |
lg vx8100 9/16/2005 4:46:13 PM |
FroshKiller All American 51913 Posts user info edit post |
I wanted the v180 at first, but I went with the Z500a in the end, and I'm glad I did. Cool phone. 9/16/2005 4:47:33 PM |
JonHGuth Suspended 39171 Posts user info edit post |
samsung x497- too small unless you got tiny girl fingers lg c1500- pretty nice, feels kinda plasticy cheap though (best way i can describe that) lg c1300i- sucks. small, ugly. however it does have a nice mirror for applying makeup on the go z500a- ugly, awkward styling. there is a reason you can get them bogo free motorola v180- just stay away from motorola lg c1300- also crappy
out of your list i would get the lg c1500
(i had a samsung and it was pretty good except i couldn't dial so note im not saying it sucks)
[Edited on September 16, 2005 at 5:40 PM. Reason : .] 9/16/2005 5:30:11 PM |
Seotaji All American 34244 Posts user info edit post |
samsung. 9/16/2005 5:35:48 PM |
Quinn All American 16417 Posts user info edit post |
z500a , ugly as shit, but you dont have to charge it very often which = win for my lazy ass
I would never buy an LG product, but thats just a personal rule. 9/16/2005 5:40:44 PM |
JonHGuth Suspended 39171 Posts user info edit post |
have you ever used an lg product? 9/16/2005 5:41:59 PM |
FroshKiller All American 51913 Posts user info edit post |
It's not so ugly. It has an external display and no retarded stub antenna! 9/16/2005 5:42:07 PM |
drunknloaded Suspended 147487 Posts user info edit post |
honestly i think the sony ericsson looked the best, i was probably leaning toward that or the samsung
oh well anythings better than my t720 that got fucked up 9/17/2005 4:05:55 AM |
Ravage6969 All American 2218 Posts user info edit post |
http://www.phonescoop.com/phones/phone.php?p=704&gi=2 9/17/2005 5:46:20 PM |
HaLo All American 14273 Posts user info edit post |
Frosh: how is the battery life on that sony ericcson. the V180 has about 60 hours of idle time battery life. 9/17/2005 6:44:13 PM |
CalledToArms All American 22025 Posts user info edit post |
i have the v180. battery is good, signal's good. its not bad at all.
i hate LG products, and ive used em 9/18/2005 2:50:16 PM |
drunknloaded Suspended 147487 Posts user info edit post |
the sony erricson came in today its nice 9/23/2005 6:26:08 PM |
qntmfred retired 40810 Posts user info edit post |
i really like my v180 9/23/2005 7:02:07 PM |
ScHpEnXeL Suspended 32613 Posts user info edit post |
all i can contribute is this samsung i have now (E715, yeah i know it's old..) has probably been the best phone i've ever had...for a while i was getting a new phone every 2-3 months but have had this one for at least a year and not a single problem out of it, so yea, good job samsung
[Edited on September 23, 2005 at 8:43 PM. Reason : asdf] 9/23/2005 8:42:43 PM |
richthofen All American 15758 Posts user info edit post |
I've had two samsung phones, and both treated me pretty well. 9/23/2005 10:57:19 PM |
StarCaptain All American 4467 Posts user info edit post |
Sony Ericsson S710a is the shit, man. 9/23/2005 11:00:13 PM |
Specter All American 6575 Posts user info edit post |
^ what he said 9/23/2005 11:01:14 PM |
goalielax All American 11252 Posts user info edit post |
here's a hint, if it's free or deeply discounted, it's a piece of shit (of course they charge 200 bucks for the RAZR, so it's not an exclusive rule)...so I would say none
And that LG VX9800 is nice a shit - got to play with one at work this week. Can't wait to get the freebies!
[Edited on September 24, 2005 at 12:22 AM. Reason : .] 9/24/2005 12:21:33 AM |