Seriously.

Ban these two guys.

12/8/2005 5:09:49 AM

I second that.

12/8/2005 5:58:11 AM

thirded

12/8/2005 10:19:40 AM

what "two guys" are you talking about?

12/8/2005 10:22:55 AM

TAKE A WILD GUESS

12/8/2005 10:23:19 AM

If you're talking about me, that would be entirely unwarranted.

I'm NOT the one BTTT'ing all my threads. Others, like JonHGuth, are doing that...aparantly in the attempt to try to get me suspended or something. Take a look at all those threads. Its JonHGuth BTTT'ing those threads.

12/8/2005 10:25:48 AM

im doing it today, its usually you
most of those threads have like 6 replies by you with no other replies in between them

12/8/2005 10:26:48 AM

^maybe thats because you post the exact same things over and over and over and over

12/8/2005 10:29:22 AM

you need to esgargs style suspend the two fuckers, whoever the sb mod is.

do your job.

12/8/2005 10:29:34 AM

I don't do it to the EXTREME like you're doing. And no one was complaining like this before you recently started doing this. Anyone using 1% of their brain can see as clear as day what you're doing. You're BTTT all my threads in the pathetic attempt to try to make me look bad, and apparantly to try to get me suspended.

12/8/2005 10:30:33 AM

no you do it really badly
thats what i am pointing out
look at those threads and see all the times that you have replied 3 or more times in a row with no other replies. then after some laughing you will do it again

12/8/2005 10:31:28 AM

Quote :

"you need to esgargs style suspend the two fuckers, whoever the sb mod is. do your job."

What are you objecting to? The board being "messed up" with all my threads at the top?

I DIDN'T DO THAT. JonHGuth IS DOING THAT. SUSPEND OR BAN JonHGuth, not me.

12/8/2005 10:31:59 AM

i havent broken any rules
you have

12/8/2005 10:32:24 AM

Quote :

"i havent broken any rules you have"

BS. What rule have I broken?

Quote :

"Just give it up JonHGuth. The mods aren't gonna suspend me because you've suddendly BTTT'ed a bunch of my threads."

12/8/2005 10:35:01 AM

Quote :

"Do not consecutively reply to a topic - If you are within the alloted timespan for editing a message that no one has replied to and you think of something to add, EDIT the message. DO NOT REPLY AGAIN. Constant abuse of this will not be tolerated."

12/8/2005 10:37:04 AM

pwnt

12/8/2005 10:37:58 AM

That rule says NOTHING about not replying to a message if no one else has replied in a long time, such as BTTT'ing a thread if no one has responded in a couple days. It's talking about not replying If you are within the alloted timespan for editing a message.

That rule is broken all the time in forums like Chit Chat. Why aren't you crusading against them? Oh, right, you are trying to censor me cause you don't agree with my views.

[Edited on December 8, 2005 at 10:41 AM. Reason : `]

12/8/2005 10:40:54 AM

in one thread i counted 4 replies in 30 minutes
pwnt

12/8/2005 10:41:29 AM

I admit I may have broken that rule before, but so have MANY others. Are you going to go after them too?

And you're calling on me to be BANNED for that? Isn't that a little excessive? Why not a suspension for a few days? Oh, right...cause you're trying to censor me cause you don't like my views?

Also, why would you BTTT a bunch of my threads? Did you think it was against the rules to BTTT an old thread too?

Quote :

"Constant abuse of this will not be tolerated"

Have I "constantly" abused this rule?

[Edited on December 8, 2005 at 10:46 AM. Reason : `]

12/8/2005 10:43:54 AM

[Edited on December 8, 2005 at 10:54 AM. Reason : .]

12/8/2005 10:46:58 AM

im just trying to show you that no one cares what you think. we all laugh at you. you aren't going to "enlighten" any of us

i don't appreciate people trolling for dimwits they can brainwash

12/8/2005 10:47:15 AM

Just admit you guys want me banned because you don't like my views. Cause we all know that's what's really going on.

12/8/2005 10:47:43 AM

nah we just dont like trolls

12/8/2005 10:48:19 AM

I'm not a troll. And even if I was, show me the rule that proscribes a ban for trolls. TWW is FULL of trolls and trolling.

[Edited on December 8, 2005 at 10:51 AM. Reason : `]

12/8/2005 10:51:24 AM

i dont care about your views, they are easy enough to ignore and laugh at

i dont like a gazillion threads about the same batshit crazy stuff while you ignore people who try to have rational debate on the subject. thats why its gotten to this point because anytime someone tries to argue about stuff with you you just post another link and ignore them.

this thread used to have debate. it wasnt always great, and there has always been some faggotry, but you have brought it to a new level. either engage in debate without just posting the same links or gtfo

12/8/2005 10:52:10 AM

preferably gtfo

12/8/2005 11:02:04 AM

Quote :

"i dont like a gazillion threads about the same batshit crazy stuff while you ignore people who try to have rational debate on the subject."

I didn't have an excessive number of threads at the top of the board until YOU BTTT'd a "gazillion" of them. And if you're saying I had too many threads at the top prior to you BTTT'ing a bunch, the so be it. But show me the rule that specifies how many threads you can have at the top of the board. If there was such a rule, I would abide by it.

Quote :

"this thread used to have debate. it wasnt always great, and there has always been some faggotry, but you have brought it to a new level. either engage in debate without just posting the same links or gtfo"

Is there a rule now that says you are banned if you don't "debate" to your satisfaction?

[Edited on December 8, 2005 at 11:05 AM. Reason : `]

12/8/2005 11:04:42 AM

you don't debate to anyone's satisfaction

[Edited on December 8, 2005 at 11:06 AM. Reason : or at all]

12/8/2005 11:06:02 AM

you dont debate period

12/8/2005 11:07:20 AM

That's your opinion. But can you have me "banned" for it? Hardly. You can't have be banned legitimately for anything. The best you can do is go crazy BTTT'ing a bunch of my threads and hope that creates some kind of unwarranted "stir" or movement against me...or say I don't debate well enough or respond to your questions enough...and should therefore be "banned." What a joke.

[Edited on December 8, 2005 at 11:10 AM. Reason : `]

12/8/2005 11:10:05 AM

^^^ He created several threads some of which have TENS of pages. Sounds like he can create a debate alright. If threads were created where nobody but him posted, that would be abuse. As it stands now, lay off him.

[Edited on December 8, 2005 at 11:10 AM. Reason : .]

12/8/2005 11:10:19 AM

debating /= posting links and quotes from said links

12/8/2005 11:11:30 AM

and some of those threads have debate on the first page or two
not after that

12/8/2005 11:11:34 AM

Quote :

"and some of those threads have debate on the first page or two not after that"

And SO WHAT if it's not enough debate to your satisfaction? Where is the rule requiring a "ban" for BTTT'ing a thread after no one has responded for a while. THERE IS NO SUCH RULE. Until there is, stfu and stop your pathetic attempts to get me banned when I've done nothing wrong warranting a ban.

[Edited on December 8, 2005 at 11:16 AM. Reason : `]

12/8/2005 11:13:37 AM

I agree

both salisbury boy and pyderi should be suspended

12/8/2005 11:14:33 AM

Maybe. I don't see how that is any of his fault. If you don't like them, do what I do. Never click on them. I don't. The fact remains that YOU bttt'ed all those threads today. If anyone should be banned, it's you. (And personally I don't think anybody should be banned.)

12/8/2005 11:14:49 AM

contantly replying with links and ignoring debate isn't what this forum should be about

12/8/2005 11:16:03 AM

Neither is bitching about how you were planning to spend time on TWW most productively, but the evil salisburyboy prevented you from doing that.

Again, people respond to his threads. If they didn't, you'd have a point.

12/8/2005 11:19:02 AM

Quote :

"And personally I don't think anybody should be banned"

Agreed.

Also, even if somebody were doing something against the rules warranting action, suspensions are the first mode of action, not an outright ban. Then, if the user continues the abuse after the suspension (s), depending on the case, an outright ban might be warranted.

The fact that these bozos are calling for me to be banned shows that they want to silence me, not that I really have done anything wrong warranting suspension or a ban.

12/8/2005 11:19:36 AM

people only respond to his threads to laugh at him

12/8/2005 11:20:08 AM

i knew that this would just strengthen his tinfoil hat "everyone is against me cause i know the truth" delusions
but whatever

12/8/2005 11:21:01 AM

did you really think that BTTT'ing a bunch of my threads would fool anyone?

^ OMG, you broke the rule you referenced above!!! BAN!!!!
OMG, you broke the rule you referenced above!!! BAN!!!!
OMG, you broke the rule you referenced above!!! BAN!!!!
OMG, you broke the rule you referenced above!!! BAN!!!!

[Edited on December 8, 2005 at 11:25 AM. Reason : `]

12/8/2005 11:23:25 AM

i wasnt trying to fool anyone

12/8/2005 11:24:56 AM

OMG, you broke the rule you referenced above!!! BAN!!!!
OMG, you broke the rule you referenced above!!! BAN!!!!
OMG, you broke the rule you referenced above!!! BAN!!!!

12/8/2005 11:26:05 AM

Quote :

"people only respond to his threads to laugh at him"

Yes, and this is the Soap Box. They should not do that. Because that "isn't what this forum should be about".

12/8/2005 11:26:47 AM

Quote :

"Do not consecutively reply to a topic - If you are within the alloted timespan for editing a message that no one has replied to and you think of something to add, EDIT the message. DO NOT REPLY AGAIN. Constant abuse of this will not be tolerated."

JonHGuth broke this rule above. Mods, BAN HIM!!!

12/8/2005 11:27:50 AM

and if you broke that rule once or twice no one cares
if you do it again and again multiple times in a row its annoying

12/8/2005 11:27:52 AM

I don't break that rule often. And when I do, it is accidental, not intentional.

You just broke the rule after having called me out for it, for crying out loud. What does that say? I'm sure it's not the first time you've done so. Based on this thread alone, you break the rule more often than I do.

And as I said before, this rule is broken ALL THE TIME, especially in forums like chit chat. I highly doubt it is enforced that strictly.

For you to suggest I be "banned" for breaking that rule is absolutely laughable.

[Edited on December 8, 2005 at 11:33 AM. Reason : `]

12/8/2005 11:32:50 AM

not often?

HA!!

12/8/2005 11:38:02 AM

Quote :

"Oh, right, you are trying to censor me cause you don't agree with my views."

I LOL'ed.

Thats like saying that you are trying to 'censor' a screaming 5 year old. Salisburyboy, if anyone on here cared about the inane theories that you push they would look them up on prisonplanet.

Lay off of the red pills. I read that they cause brain damage.

12/8/2005 11:57:35 AM