spookyjon All American 21682 Posts user info edit post |
Quote : | "ISRAEL’S armed forces have been ordered by Ariel Sharon, the prime minister, to be ready by the end of March for possible strikes on secret uranium enrichment sites in Iran, military sources have revealed.
The order came after Israeli intelligence warned the government that Iran was operating enrichment facilities, believed to be small and concealed in civilian locations.
Iran’s stand-off with the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) over nuclear inspections and aggressive rhetoric from Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, the Iranian president, who said last week that Israel should be moved to Europe, are causing mounting concern.
The crisis is set to come to a head in early March, when Mohamed El-Baradei, the head of the IAEA, will present his next report on Iran. El-Baradei, who received the Nobel peace prize yesterday, warned that the world was “losing patience” with Iran. " |
http://www.timesonline.co.uk/article/0,,2089-1920074,00.html
If anybody wants to come to my armageddon party, holla around March.12/11/2005 10:28:36 PM |
Woodfoot All American 60354 Posts user info edit post |
oh great
3 months to convince the US to go along with this 12/11/2005 10:31:22 PM |
skokiaan All American 26447 Posts user info edit post |
i want to see this go down 12/11/2005 10:50:23 PM |
brianj320 All American 9166 Posts user info edit post |
hmm this could be a bad thing 12/11/2005 10:52:13 PM |
0EPII1 All American 42541 Posts user info edit post |
of course when israel suggests something like this, there is no outrage.
but when ANY COUNTRY suggests something against israel, they are ANTI-SEMITIC!!!
israel should be, and will be, destroyed one today.
(i don't mean all jewish people by this. i mean israel, i.e., zionism as an ideology, and all those who support it; the non-racist jews--a small percentage--will be saved) 12/11/2005 10:56:36 PM |
DirtyGreek All American 29309 Posts user info edit post |
well, the world had to end one day 12/11/2005 11:09:47 PM |
GrumpyGOP yovo yovo bonsoir 18191 Posts user info edit post |
Quote : | "the non-racist jews--a small percentage--will be saved" |
So which of the following stupid things are you trying to say here?
1) Only a small percentage of Jews are non-racist, or 2) The only governments who would like to invade and conquer Israel will be successful (laughable enough), and they will also show great restraint in leaving certain people alive and not just going after everyone12/11/2005 11:34:36 PM |
spookyjon All American 21682 Posts user info edit post |
We could just act like he never posted. 12/11/2005 11:47:59 PM |
The Coz Tempus Fugitive 26095 Posts user info edit post |
Quote : | "israel should be, and will be, destroyed one today." |
You're about 2000 years too late with that prediction.12/12/2005 12:10:58 AM |
PinkandBlack Suspended 10517 Posts user info edit post |
OMG WHEN ARE WE GOING TO SEE A "DOING THE WORK OF EUROPE" PATCH FOR ISRAELI SOLDIERS?
So is Russia going to back Iran on this? 12/12/2005 12:16:17 AM |
Smath74 All American 93278 Posts user info edit post |
good. iran has no fucking business developing nuclear weapons, and someone has to stop them. 12/12/2005 12:23:50 AM |
ParksNrec All American 8742 Posts user info edit post |
right, we're the only country mature enough to handle the power that comes with mass destruction... 12/12/2005 12:26:48 AM |
jwb9984 All American 14039 Posts user info edit post |
while that's obviously not true, iran is definitely a country i think we can agree shouldnt have nukes 12/12/2005 12:31:17 AM |
AxlBonBach All American 45550 Posts user info edit post |
ahaha
most of the eastern world is still anti-semitic
half of the western world is too
stop frontin like it's not your anti-semitism that makes you at LEAST partially hate israel. if you got hate in your heart, let it out, but for god sakes stop making it seem like the only hate mongerers are them.
and i'll put money down that israel wont be destroyed in our lifetime. 12/12/2005 12:43:18 AM |
davelen21 All American 4119 Posts user info edit post |
maybe we will sell them some brand new f-16s and the external fuel tanks for a deep stike against a country that is a nuclear threat... oh wait, that already happened. Maybe we will give them f-117s this time 12/12/2005 12:52:52 AM |
GrumpyGOP yovo yovo bonsoir 18191 Posts user info edit post |
Quote : | "right, we're the only country mature enough to handle the power that comes with mass destruction" |
So clever, and yet...
1) It's in our best interests not to let people who hate us have nukes, and since when is acting in our best interest the most abominable thing we can do? 2) It's in the best interest of every freedom-loving person on the planet not to let dictatorships/theocracies/military juntas/etc. from having nukes. 3) It's in the best interest of every person who enjoys being alive and not glowing in the dark not to let angry, rogue, terrorist-supporting states have nukes.12/12/2005 1:44:47 AM |
Fuel All American 7016 Posts user info edit post |
I blame Bush for this, and I'll tell you why.
If not for Bush sparking outrage in the muslim world, that crazy bastard Ahmadinejad would have never been elected and Iran would be working with the IAEA right now. 12/12/2005 1:49:54 AM |
GrumpyGOP yovo yovo bonsoir 18191 Posts user info edit post |
Yes, I'm sure that without Bush's actions Iran would be a paragon of international cooperation and whatnot. It was really right about to turn a new leaf before. 12/12/2005 1:54:53 AM |
moron All American 34142 Posts user info edit post |
Quote : | "1) It's in our best interests not to let people who hate us have nukes, and since when is acting in our best interest the most abominable thing we can do?" |
Other countries probably look at us the same way and think "if American has nukes, we want them to, because they hate us, and we need to defend ourselves if it comes to it". What you seem to be supporting is the idea that childish bickering on the national scale is okay. It may be reality that it is what happens, but it seems ridiculous to me to actively support it.12/12/2005 2:25:23 AM |
Fuel All American 7016 Posts user info edit post |
They were very close to coming to an agreement with the IAEA. It came as a shock when Iran suspended all negotiations with European leaders, and it was because of Ahmadinejad and his hard-line approach to foreign policy. 12/12/2005 2:26:44 AM |
Josh8315 Suspended 26780 Posts user info edit post |
if this happens, it will mean hell for bush 12/12/2005 4:41:35 AM |
30thAnnZ Suspended 31803 Posts user info edit post |
Quote : | "that crazy bastard Ahmadinejad would have never been elected" |
wouldn't have made any difference. whoever gets "elected" there does what the ayatollah tells him.12/12/2005 8:15:39 AM |
salisburyboy Suspended 9434 Posts user info edit post |
FYI, Iran is developing a nuclear POWER PLANT. But, forget about that. The facts don't matter anymore.
IRAN HAS WMDS! JUST LIKE IRAQ DID! QUICK, WE BETTER INVADE IRAN ASAP!!
WHY? BECAUSE THE ZIONISTS AND NEOCON JOOZ SAY SO! 12/12/2005 8:42:18 AM |
30thAnnZ Suspended 31803 Posts user info edit post |
would you be willing to be your life that it is ONLY a power plant? 12/12/2005 8:50:25 AM |
billyboy All American 3174 Posts user info edit post |
So, maybe this will give us a reason to get out of Iraq. I don't think we need to be caught in the crossfire of Israel and Iran, especially if Syria then gets involved. But, I'm sure we'll find a way to get involved. 12/12/2005 8:55:35 AM |
salisburyboy Suspended 9434 Posts user info edit post |
Quote : | "would you be willing to be your life that it is ONLY a power plant?" |
Were you betting the Zionists and the guvmint were telling the truth about Iraq, and that Saddam really had WMDs?
Why do you believe these Zionist blowhards? They already intentionally lied to trick us into one war.12/12/2005 9:00:25 AM |
Excoriator Suspended 10214 Posts user info edit post |
12/12/2005 9:01:15 AM |
30thAnnZ Suspended 31803 Posts user info edit post |
i asked you a question. you answered with a question. 12/12/2005 9:08:57 AM |
Stimwalt All American 15292 Posts user info edit post |
Russia might have backed Iran a couple decades ago, but they don't have the gumption or the resources for it anymore. Only if China joins the Russian standoff will the US/Israel have a serious political problem. 12/12/2005 9:35:19 AM |
cookiepuss All American 3486 Posts user info edit post |
if i were china, and israel and the US attacked iran, i'd sure as hell mobilize against taiwan. it's practically inevitable anyways. maybe Nkorea could get in on the bloodshed. 12/12/2005 10:47:21 AM |
MathFreak All American 14478 Posts user info edit post |
I think the Iranians have already started...
12/12/2005 11:15:37 AM |
Woodfoot All American 60354 Posts user info edit post |
ALUMINUM TUBES!!! 12/12/2005 11:31:37 AM |
firmbuttgntl Suspended 11931 Posts user info edit post |
Ok, time to pack up for the galapagos. 12/12/2005 11:34:51 AM |
salisburyboy Suspended 9434 Posts user info edit post |
ELECTROMAGNETIC PULSE ATTACK!
http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=43956
Quote : | "Gingrich sees Iran threat to U.S. like Nazi Germany
WorldNetDaily November 20, 2005 By Joseph Farah
WASHINGTON – The threat posed to the national security of the United States by Iran was likened only to the one posed by Nazi Germany in the 1930s, by former House Speaker Newt Gingrich, who suggested Tehran could be planning for a pre-emptive nuclear electromagnetic pulse attack on America that would turn a third or more of the country "back to a 19th century level of development."" |
12/12/2005 11:41:08 AM |
marko Tom Joad 72828 Posts user info edit post |
12/12/2005 11:48:57 AM |
GrumpyGOP yovo yovo bonsoir 18191 Posts user info edit post |
Quote : | "Other countries probably look at us the same way and think "if American has nukes, we want them to, because they hate us, and we need to defend ourselves if it comes to it"." |
Yes, and if I was from an America-hating dictatorship that I supported, I'd be saying that my country should develop nukes for exactly that reason.
Quote : | "What you seem to be supporting is the idea that childish bickering on the national scale is okay." |
No, I'm saying that acting in your national interest is understandable.12/12/2005 11:50:01 AM |
Republican18 All American 16575 Posts user info edit post |
WWIII 12/12/2005 11:51:40 AM |
ddlakhan All American 990 Posts user info edit post |
if that happens.... i hope it ends quickly, cause i sure as hell dont want to be drafted... 12/12/2005 11:57:43 AM |
Protostar All American 3495 Posts user info edit post |
Let Israel attack Iran if they wish, so long as the US has nothing to do with it. 12/12/2005 12:04:06 PM |
spookyjon All American 21682 Posts user info edit post |
Hahahahahahahahahahahhahahahah riiiiiiiiight 12/12/2005 12:11:10 PM |
MathFreak All American 14478 Posts user info edit post |
Quote : | "Yes, and if I was from an America-hating dictatorship that I supported, I'd be saying that my country should develop nukes for exactly that reason." |
Yes, anybody who thinks about their own self-defense, is an America-hater.12/12/2005 12:13:45 PM |
Protostar All American 3495 Posts user info edit post |
Quote : | "if that happens.... i hope it ends quickly, cause i sure as hell dont want to be drafted..." |
Screw that. The US is on it's own. I'm not going to get blown up in some stupid war Israel started. I'll leave the US completely before that happens.12/12/2005 12:15:38 PM |
30thAnnZ Suspended 31803 Posts user info edit post |
Have fun! See ya! 12/12/2005 12:16:19 PM |
GrumpyGOP yovo yovo bonsoir 18191 Posts user info edit post |
Quote : | "Yes, anybody who thinks about their own self-defense, is an America-hater." |
No, idiot. They're not America-hating because they want to defend themselves, they're America-hating because they're an Islamic fundamentalist government that, since its inception, has been opposing the United States at every turn, and which, put bluntly, hates us.12/12/2005 12:23:04 PM |
sparky Garage Mod 12301 Posts user info edit post |
i heard on CNN yesterday that Iran was allowing US companies to bid on the construction of their nuclear power plant. i would think that this supports the idea that Iran really is just trying to make nuclear power...not nuclear weapons. but maybe i'm just naive. 12/12/2005 12:30:39 PM |
PvtJoker All American 15000 Posts user info edit post |
well, I guess this is it, folks. 12/12/2005 12:35:02 PM |
GrumpyGOP yovo yovo bonsoir 18191 Posts user info edit post |
^^allowing to bid =/= allowing to build
Besides, nobody's really denying, I think, that they're building a power plant. The worry is that the reason for building that plant, as well as the other things they are building, are worrisome.
[Edited on December 12, 2005 at 12:39 PM. Reason : ] 12/12/2005 12:38:34 PM |
Woodfoot All American 60354 Posts user info edit post |
perhaps they realize nuclear power is a much better source of energy? 12/12/2005 12:41:52 PM |
PvtJoker All American 15000 Posts user info edit post |
This genuinely worries me. (Isreal - Iran)
[Edited on December 12, 2005 at 12:42 PM. Reason : e3ht2l.3f 2] 12/12/2005 12:42:03 PM |
Kris All American 36908 Posts user info edit post |
Quote : | "3 months to convince the US to go along with this" |
Why bother with that. They'll just do whatever the hell they want and then simply justify it later.12/12/2005 1:41:10 PM |