You heard it here first! almost 2 years ago even!!1

Quote :

"TGD: W is going down!!1"

12/17/2005 11:24:57 AM

more like OMG Bush to get a piece of impeached pie!!1

12/17/2005 11:54:31 AM

America's too ignorant and lazy to do anything about this

and Bush knows it

12/17/2005 12:08:55 PM

The legislature can do whatever it wants. It is up to the Supreme Court to decide what was or was not legal. Bring a case, I'm curious to see how it turns out

Of course, the Bushy needs to worry about being charged with tresspassing or something after it loses at the SCOTUS.

[Edited on December 17, 2005 at 12:16 PM. Reason : ,.,]

12/17/2005 12:16:24 PM

littering! no commander in chief worth his salt would litter!

12/17/2005 12:18:43 PM

George Bush: "If this were a dictatorship, it would be a heck of a lot easier - just so long I'm the dictator." December 18, 2000

12/17/2005 12:33:59 PM

I hate bush

12/17/2005 1:11:41 PM

even Republican senators are voting his things down

talk about owned

12/17/2005 1:37:45 PM

Talk about midterm elections!

12/17/2005 6:02:24 PM

Quote :

"George Bush: "If this were a dictatorship, it would be a heck of a lot easier - just so long I'm the dictator." December 18, 2000"

would it not be easier? how was it for Saddam? do you disagree or are you trying to infer, by posting that, that President Bush wants to overthrow the other two branches of government and establish a dictatorship with him having ultimate control?

and if you say that he, being the head Republican, has ultimate control, then perhaps you should have talked your boy John Kerry into supporting someone else who better represents the views of the Democratic Party to run for President...


...like Howard Dean.

12/18/2005 8:42:47 AM

you're giving a dishonest choice there. what I am saying by posting that quote is that george bush would like to be the dictator. It's a joke, of course, because it's more like cheney or one of their boys who would like to be the dictator. The point stands, however.

and i wish holward dean had been the candidate.

12/18/2005 9:43:09 AM

Quote :

"Senator says she's asked for opinions on Bush impeachment 12/19/2005 @ 5:57 pm Filed by RAW STORY Sen. Barbara Boxer (D-CA) has become the first in the Senate to raise consideration of impeachment of President George W. Bush for authorizing spying on Americans without warrants, RAW STORY has learned. In a release issued this evening, Boxer said she's asked "four presidential scholars" for their opinion on impeachment after former White Housel counsel John Dean -- made famous by his role in revealing the Watergate tapes -- asserted that President Bush had 'admitted' to an 'impeachable offense.' Boxer isn't the first congressmember today to float the word. Earlier today, Rep. John Lewis (D-GA) said Bush should be impeached if he broke the law in the spying program. The liberal California senator has tangled with Bush before -- earlier this year, she challenged the president's Ohio electoral votes."

12/19/2005 6:33:37 PM

I know of a certain Head of State who's praying to retain the House and Senate next November.

12/19/2005 6:38:30 PM

^ I second that notion. The sharks smell blood and are circling.

The question the Congress should ask though: do we really want a President Dick Cheney?

[Edited on December 19, 2005 at 6:50 PM. Reason : .]

12/19/2005 6:50:09 PM

If they can try someone for getting a blow job, they can try someone for violating the civil rights of American citizens, I say.

12/19/2005 6:55:34 PM

John Dean basically said that Bush is the first sitting present to confess to committing a crime on national television.

12/19/2005 7:42:17 PM

Quote :

"If they can try someone for getting a blow job, they can try someone for violating the civil rights of American citizens, I say."

12/19/2005 10:16:12 PM

well, once again, they tried him for lying about the blowjob. Nonetheless, yes, of course he should be impeached if he broke the law. He's broken tons of laws, but the proof for this one is outstanding.

12/19/2005 10:25:21 PM

Quote :

"“For the last few days, I have witnessed the President, the Vice President, the Secretary of State, and the Attorney General repeatedly misrepresent the facts. “The record needs to be set clear that the Administration never afforded members briefed on the program an opportunity to either approve or disapprove the NSA program. The limited members who were told of the program were prohibited by the Administration from sharing any information about it with our colleagues, including other members of the Intelligence Committees. “At the time, I expressed my concerns to Vice President Cheney that the limited information provided to Congress was so overly restricted that it prevented members of Congress from conducting meaningful oversight of the legal and operational aspects of the program. “These concerns were never addressed, and I was prohibited from sharing my views with my colleagues. “Now that this issue has been brought out into the open, I strongly urge the Senate Intelligence Committee to immediately undertake a full investigation into the legal and operational aspects of the program, including the lack of sufficient congressional oversight.”"

http://americablog.blogspot.com/Intell1.pdf

12/19/2005 10:53:32 PM

^
well sure, if we can have Rockefeller resign for not doing his job along with it

"OMG I'm supposed to conduct oversight, but...but...but the President just won't let me!"

[Edited on December 19, 2005 at 11:39 PM. Reason : "I'm telling mommy!!1"]

12/19/2005 11:37:35 PM

Hahahaha Bush's stance is awesome.

I'M THE PRESIDENT NIGGA I DO WHAT I WANT

12/20/2005 12:11:27 AM

^ Yeah, it's funny.

Bush tried the apologetic approach following Katrina, and his approval ratings still plummeted. I bet he's trying the opposite here to see if it helps him out any.

12/20/2005 1:44:48 AM

Who cares about the approval ratings anyway. It's not like he's going in for a third term in office. Besides, the last elections proved that majority of the opinions suck anyway

12/20/2005 1:47:17 AM

Quote :

"The question the Congress should ask though: do we really want a President Dick Cheney?"

Answer is no.

12/20/2005 2:50:02 AM

How did Rockefeller fail to do his duties?

12/20/2005 3:34:26 AM

Quote :

"Gamecat: How did Rockefeller fail to do his duties?"

The whole point of having the responsibility to oversee something is to...well...oversee it.

Shrugging your shoulders and writing a post facto letter to bitch doesn't qualify.

12/20/2005 9:09:11 AM

I fucking love the defense of "Well I told SOME people!"

WHAT THE FUCK? Oh, you're supposed to go through a court, and you didn't, but you told a couple of senators, so that's all right?

12/20/2005 10:40:11 AM

why don't we wait for those old people in the robes to decide on whether the law was broken or not before we all go apeshit, ok?

12/20/2005 10:41:20 AM

Democrat strategy: Make broad generalizations with no basis in fact, and allow stupid americans to carry the lies around and stir public dissent. All the while covering up their own deceit and illegal activity (i.e.: Clintons using IRS to attack political enemies, Harry Reid's illegal campaign contributions, Pelosi's unregistered trips paid for by lobbyists)....

12/20/2005 10:42:34 AM

^ hahahaahahahahahhahahahahahahahaaa

12/20/2005 10:44:11 AM

Quote :

"Secondly, there are such things as roving wiretaps. Now, by the way, any time you hear the United States government talking about wiretap, it requires -- a wiretap requires a court order. Nothing has changed, by the way. When we're talking about chasing down terrorists, we're talking about getting a court order before we do so. It's important for our fellow citizens to understand, when you think Patriot Act, constitutional guarantees are in place when it comes to doing what is necessary to protect our homeland, because we value the Constitution."

http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2004/04/20040420-2.html

Bush speech, April 20, 2004:

LIAR

12/20/2005 11:08:26 AM

This whole issue is just so stupid. Probably any other administration could have at least linked Congress in with it to cover their political bases. The sheer lack of political savvy by the Bush administration is going to be its downfall.

12/20/2005 11:09:53 AM

Its cool. Karl is in a bit of a funk.

you know

Like when JJ goes on a 5 game slide.

and then comes back and drains 41 pts on someone.

12/20/2005 12:06:30 PM

JJ had a 5-game slide??

12/20/2005 12:34:47 PM

Quote :

"TGD: The whole point of having the responsibility to oversee something is to...well...oversee it."

And just what could he have done? He was legally prohibited from airing his concerns in public.

Simply being told what the NSA is doing by Bush, regardless of the law, does not allow for meaningful oversight.

12/20/2005 7:53:29 PM