right. gg espn.com
http://sports.espn.go.com/nfl/playoffs05/series?series=wassea

right hand side about halfway down

1/11/2006 4:11:46 PM

yeah i saw that and was like wtf

1/11/2006 4:12:40 PM

ummmmm, they get paid to do that shit. You get nothing to talk e-smack

Not a bad assumption. Moss will get double teamed. Safties will have to cover Cooley. That puts 7 in the box to stop the Portis and one on one coverage with Thrash. Seattle's secondary is depleted and fairly weak as is.

Thrash will either have 100 yards receiving, 10 catches, or a touchdown.

- The Guru.

1/11/2006 4:23:35 PM

the guru?

do you watch football?

teams have double teamed moss all year and brunell still throws to him and he still gets yards.

even when brunell doesnt throw to him, his next choice is cooley

and then a rb

and then david patten

and THEN thrash

why dont you bet me on paypal?

[Edited on January 11, 2006 at 4:26 PM. Reason : ps just b/c someone gets paid to do something doesnt mean they are always good at it]

1/11/2006 4:26:15 PM

Patten is on the injury report.

Did you see that, all-star?

1/11/2006 4:30:47 PM

it would be great if he finished with 9 for 99 yds, and got tackled at the 1 yard line on the last one

1/11/2006 4:33:24 PM

Thrash is a player to watch to see how good he can catch with a broken thumb...

1/11/2006 4:34:06 PM

i actually did not see that

but the fact remains that only 5 redskins receivers have caught td passes, only 3 have caught more than 1, only 1 of the 5 is actually a WR and NONE of them is named patten or thrash.

1/11/2006 4:34:16 PM

dude, more than likely he wont go off, but in a big game, a playoff game at that, defenses tend to put way more empahasis on stopping the offenses big playmaker. I think this will be the case with Seattle. By them focusing on all of the other weapons that they have seen go off in the past few weeks

Moss with 2 or 3 TD's in a game

Cooley with 3 TD's in one game

Portis back to triple digits in a game with scores

It would not suprise me at all to see someone like Thrash have a productive game, because all he will have to do is beat one on one coverage.

We will have to see, But I get the credit if he does, and I'll gladly eat crow if he doesnt.

1/11/2006 4:39:26 PM

Quote :

"because all he will have to do is beat one on one coverage."

thats all he has had to do his entire career.

Quote :

"and I'll gladly eat crow if he doesnt."

ditto the other way.

i wont take any credit if he doesnt except to bash you b/c it was obvious to everyone but you and these particular espn guys. but you can bash the hell out of me if he does.

1/11/2006 4:42:09 PM

agreed.

1/11/2006 4:44:38 PM

Thrash wont be doing ANYTHING today. They just said he was inactive.

Go SKins!

1/14/2006 4:28:19 PM

Time for someone to eat crow.

1/14/2006 4:33:00 PM

hahaha

w00t

1/14/2006 6:07:57 PM

thats not eating crow, thats bad luck.

THRAsH IS OUT WITH AN INJURY. IT IS ALL BECAUSE OF THE SEAHAWKS. I KNOW NOTHING ABOUT FOOTBALL NOW.

AHAHA

SHUT THE FUCK UP.

/thread

[Edited on January 14, 2006 at 6:20 PM. Reason : asdf]

1/14/2006 6:20:42 PM

wow, well word of the day shows that you are indeed classless, sir

1/14/2006 7:01:57 PM

^^If you knew as much about football as you claim, you would have known that Thrash was on the injury report this week, dumbass.

I bet you're not even the "Guru" of your own fucking street.

1/14/2006 7:04:58 PM

Quote :

"you would have known that Thrash was on the injury report this week, dumbass. "

exactly

1/14/2006 7:41:10 PM

Quote :

"Thrash is a player to watch to see how good he can catch with a broken thumb... 1/11/2006 4:34:06 PM"

I did call it on the 11th.

[Edited on January 14, 2006 at 8:01 PM. Reason : .]

1/14/2006 8:00:38 PM