User not logged in - login - register
Home Calendar Books School Tool Photo Gallery Message Boards Users Statistics Advertise Site Info
go to bottom | |
 Message Boards » » seriously, i'd make a good soapbox moderator Page [1]  
Excoriator
Suspended
10214 Posts
user info
edit post

i've been on TWW since late 2000... I know the culture, i know soapbox culture. I regularly visit soapbox and i'm laid back, but i wouldn't put up with endless salisburyboy copy-pastes.

thx.

1/20/2006 5:24:10 PM

qntmfred
retired
40595 Posts
user info
edit post

nothx

1/20/2006 6:28:54 PM

30thAnnZ
Suspended
31803 Posts
user info
edit post

Quote :
"i wouldn't put up with endless salisburyboy copy-pastes"


he's got my vote

1/20/2006 6:34:27 PM

RoidRaginTKE
Suspended
297 Posts
user info
edit post

make a troll a mod

riight

1/20/2006 7:21:35 PM

Woodfoot
All American
60354 Posts
user info
edit post

hell

if it gets salisbury suspended, i'd make W the fucking soap box mod

1/20/2006 10:48:27 PM

joe_schmoe
All American
18758 Posts
user info
edit post

Quote :
"make a troll a mod"


lolf

1/21/2006 12:22:02 AM

theDuke866
All American
52765 Posts
user info
edit post

I think I'd be a good Soap Box mod

but I'm not sure if I want the job or not. Leaning towards "yes", but I'd be pretty hesitant to suspend anyone for doing what salisburyboy does.

The chit-chattish threads ("W is the dumbest President ever! You're stupid if you like him" or "All you liberals are pussyfied, un-American faggots") would get deleted, and if someone made a habit of it, I'd boot 'em.

Trolling simply to be a pain in the ass (esgargs/ultra) would also be a one way ticket to Suspendville.

salisburyboy, while a pain in the ass and clinically insane, isn't out to annoy anyone, and at least he's thinking. Not logically, but he's thinking. I'd honestly have a little restraint when it came to squeezing the trigger on him.

But I would probably be substantially quicker to lock some of his threads, and if he refused to exercise some moderation in the amount he broadcasts his lunacy, I'd put him on ice for a couple of weeks again...and again each subsequent time he grossly overstepped the bounds of the "reasonable person" test of how much is too much.


What in the hell, I guess I talked myself into it, on the condition that there is a fair amount of popular support for it. Basically, if y'all want me to do it, I'll do it.

[Edited on January 21, 2006 at 12:26 AM. Reason : asdfasdf]

1/21/2006 12:25:52 AM

spöokyjon

18617 Posts
user info
edit post

I'd vote for teh duke.

1/21/2006 12:40:10 AM

skokiaan
All American
26447 Posts
user info
edit post

^^ I think just being ultra/esgargs would be a trip to suspendville

1/21/2006 1:14:10 AM

Woodfoot
All American
60354 Posts
user info
edit post

if he can't understand whats wrong w/ salisburyboy

he doesn't get my vote

sorry duke...

1/21/2006 1:51:36 AM

theDuke866
All American
52765 Posts
user info
edit post

oh, believe me, he annoys the shit out of me

but just because he's crazy as shit and likes to cut and paste isn't in and of itself reason to suspend him, regardless of what I personally would LIKE to do. I just can't ideologically justify it very easily.

But, I'm pretty pragmatic rather than ideological. There is, of course, a point at which I would say "I've had it--be gone."

1/21/2006 2:29:40 AM

Excoriator
Suspended
10214 Posts
user info
edit post

esgargs/ultra don't even post that much in the soapbox

1/21/2006 8:50:42 AM

Excoriator
Suspended
10214 Posts
user info
edit post

the best strategy for dealing with salisburyboy is perpetual suspensions. as soon as he posts a prisonplanet link or links the zionists to anything, he gets a two week suspension. after two weeks, he's free to post as much as he likes but then as soon as he slips up and starts unrolling the tinfoil he gets shut up again before he can destroy anything.

i don't think what he's doing deserves a permanent ban, because he's not being malicious.... but by the same token he shouldn't be allowed to destroy everything with his paranoid jew conspiracies

1/21/2006 10:12:22 AM

cyrion
All American
27139 Posts
user info
edit post

i wouldnt bother suspending him. id just lock all his threads as soon as he started using the paste instead of replying to questions. at that time there is no more debate and it should be locked.

i agree that "w is gay" and the like are more annoying and should be deleted and/or result in suspensions though.

1/21/2006 12:47:45 PM

marko
Tom Joad
72823 Posts
user info
edit post

i've recommended duke like 5 times now to jake

most recent was like 2 weeks ago

1/21/2006 1:21:08 PM

Woodfoot
All American
60354 Posts
user info
edit post

Quote :
" There is, of course, a point at which I would say "I've had it--be gone.""

can you give us an example

1/21/2006 5:11:41 PM

joe17669
All American
22728 Posts
user info
edit post

WOOD4MOD

1/21/2006 7:04:06 PM

Weeeees
All American
23730 Posts
user info
edit post

Weeeees4mod

1/21/2006 7:14:37 PM

RattlerRyan
All American
8660 Posts
user info
edit post

make a troll a mod

riight

1/21/2006 7:29:11 PM

spöokyjon

18617 Posts
user info
edit post

Yeah. Making [user]Excorciator[/user] a mod would be fucking stupid. But I would support theDuke866.

I was against suspending salisburyboy the first time, but honestly, the soap box got so much better after he was gone that I'm glad he got resuspended.

1/21/2006 8:21:05 PM

 Message Boards » Feedback Forum » seriously, i'd make a good soapbox moderator Page [1]  
go to top | |
Admin Options : move topic | lock topic

© 2024 by The Wolf Web - All Rights Reserved.
The material located at this site is not endorsed, sponsored or provided by or on behalf of North Carolina State University.
Powered by CrazyWeb v2.38 - our disclaimer.