dFshadow All American 9507 Posts user info edit post |
http://wiredblogs.tripod.com/cars/index.blog?entry_id=1423664
Quote : | "BMW held its annual press gala this year on the eve of the Geneva Motor Show along the edge of Lake Geneva. What caught a lot of attention after the usual spiel of company executive speeches was the world premier of its limited edition JCW Mini, which the company says is its fastest Mini yet. The new Mini owes its power and speed to a 218-horsepower engine, a more aerodynamically-designed front end and 88 pounds of less vehicle weight compared to its predecessor. With an acceleration of zero to 62 mph in six seconds, the JCW Mini's maximum speed tops out at 150 mph. Look for it in the [b/United States later this year for $30,000, but unfortunately only 2,000 units will be produced and half of those are already sold[/b], BMW executives said." |
2/27/2006 7:39:23 PM |
tchenku midshipman 18586 Posts user info edit post |
maybe 6.9 secs
218hp is not much to work with
and 88lbs off of how much? 2800lbs? 2/27/2006 7:48:43 PM |
icanread All American 2119 Posts user info edit post |
^ you talk as if you were part of the design group from bmw? 2/27/2006 8:00:57 PM |
Weeeees All American 23730 Posts user info edit post |
they did a great job of shoots photos of it 2/27/2006 8:16:35 PM |
dFshadow All American 9507 Posts user info edit post |
it's just a wired blog of a contributer at the geneva convention, no historical reference intended
i'm sure there are probably better pics out there somewhere 2/27/2006 8:20:23 PM |
BigBlueRam All American 16852 Posts user info edit post |
218hp would be a blast in a car that light/small. if 0-62 is 6 sec., 0-60 times are likely high 5's. not fast, but not bad at all for what it is. however, the 30k price tag is a joke. 2/27/2006 8:28:35 PM |
tchenku midshipman 18586 Posts user info edit post |
curb weight stock: ~2700 lbs
and it doesnt look any smaller than some civic if you ask me
but 218hp in that thing would be fun, yes 2/27/2006 8:35:04 PM |
arghx Deucefest '04 7584 Posts user info edit post |
2700ish is a pretty good weight these days. This sounds like a pretty good car, except for that rediculous price tag 2/28/2006 12:57:10 AM |
YanTheManV All American 12416 Posts user info edit post |
Quote : | "BMW's Fastest Mini Yet-28hp, 0-62 in 6secs, $30k" |
wow 28 horsepower thats fast2/28/2006 11:50:30 AM |
MrT All American 1336 Posts user info edit post |
for $30k i could buy two used bmws and crash them into each other 2/28/2006 11:51:52 AM |
hgtran All American 9855 Posts user info edit post |
Give me the new Civic Si. 2/28/2006 1:04:24 PM |
sumfoo1 soup du hier 41043 Posts user info edit post |
^ ugliest thing i ever have seen...
+ for its price its not even thaaaat fast.
all these quick hondas are so over rated people are spending more on them than they do on cars that actually have power... not to mention they don't feel like a honda inside either. 2/28/2006 1:10:05 PM |
Woodfoot All American 60354 Posts user info edit post |
i'd still take the solstice 2/28/2006 1:11:39 PM |
TKE-Teg All American 43410 Posts user info edit post |
^^^unfortunately, the new Si would get smoked.
Quote : | "2700ish is a pretty good weight these days." |
Not really. Have you seen the size of the car?!? It should weigh less.
$30k for something like that? Hell no I'll pass.
[Edited on February 28, 2006 at 1:16 PM. Reason : ^^]
[Edited on February 28, 2006 at 1:16 PM. Reason : s]2/28/2006 1:15:50 PM |
hgtran All American 9855 Posts user info edit post |
^yea, but it's 10K less. 2/28/2006 1:19:07 PM |
JonHGuth Suspended 39171 Posts user info edit post |
Quote : | "Not really. Have you seen the size of the car?!? It should weigh less." |
some people want all the creature comfort and safety features for what that car comes with, thats a good weight2/28/2006 2:12:17 PM |
Ronny All American 30652 Posts user info edit post |
ONLY 28 HP?!?!?! 2/28/2006 2:40:22 PM |
sumfoo1 soup du hier 41043 Posts user info edit post |
with all the safety b.s. now i think we'll be seeing the end of sub 3000lb cars here soon. 2/28/2006 2:44:26 PM |
Noen All American 31346 Posts user info edit post |
There's another production Mini out there that's rated at 275hp. Meh. 2/28/2006 3:57:57 PM |
Skack All American 31140 Posts user info edit post |
They are fun little cars and I wouldn't mind owning this one, but the price just puts it into a category that it can't compete in IMO.
In that range I could get an STi or a Evo that would stomp it from a performance perspective.
For a fun people hauler it has to compete with the Acura TSX, Mercedes C230, BMW 325, and probably a few others that I'm forgetting. I guess it's just another niche market car and the fact that all 2000 of them are already sold is a pretty good indicator that its a strong niche. 2/28/2006 4:49:24 PM |
Mr. Joshua Swimfanfan 43948 Posts user info edit post |
No thanks.
Mini Cooper sounds too much like Winnie Cooper from the Wonder Years. That girl was a bitch. 3/1/2006 2:01:15 PM |
0EPII1 All American 42541 Posts user info edit post |
Quote : | "they did a great job of shoots photos of it" |
here you go. some really amazing pictures here:
http://www.streetdream.de/cars/mini/coopers_works_gp.html
http://www.seriouswheels.com/top-2006-Mini-Cooper-John-Cooper-Works-GP-Tuning-Kit.htm3/9/2006 9:06:10 PM |
Wolf2Ranger All American 2615 Posts user info edit post |
Cobalt SS 0-60 5.9 205 hp (thats what GM says) weight is ~2900lbs cost is a ~$8,000 less and its bigger. tops out at 148mph sooo why should anyone buy this mini? hell, for 30k, thats and evo or an sti
dont forget about srt4 at ~24k?! another better option
[Edited on March 9, 2006 at 9:17 PM. Reason : .] 3/9/2006 9:16:43 PM |
slut All American 8357 Posts user info edit post |
what was supposed to be impressive about this? 3/9/2006 9:47:01 PM |
sumfoo1 soup du hier 41043 Posts user info edit post |
yeah and they all suck.... moving on now.... 3/9/2006 9:52:50 PM |
Noen All American 31346 Posts user info edit post |
^^^because the Mini outhandles a cobalt in every possible aspect.
The Cobalt is a worthless car on the track. 3/9/2006 11:29:18 PM |
nacstate All American 3785 Posts user info edit post |
no thanks, I don't like having to totally take my eyes away from the road to check the speedometer. 3/10/2006 2:09:41 PM |
SandSanta All American 22435 Posts user info edit post |
Did you just throw a chevy out for comparison? 3/10/2006 2:14:10 PM |
JonHGuth Suspended 39171 Posts user info edit post |
HEY I GUESS I'LL TAKE THE CHEVY ahaha 3/10/2006 3:37:09 PM |
H8R wear sumthin tight 60155 Posts user info edit post |
Quote : | "Did you just throw a chevy out for comparison?" |
3/10/2006 4:09:49 PM |
Noen All American 31346 Posts user info edit post |
Quote : | "no thanks, I don't like having to totally take my eyes away from the road to check the speedometer." |
because you don't have to do that with every car on the road today already... oh wait.3/10/2006 4:33:42 PM |
JonHGuth Suspended 39171 Posts user info edit post |
the speedometer is still in the "eye triangle" 3/10/2006 4:34:23 PM |