5

3/8/2006 12:40:33 PM

any discussion where one individual suggests God is a white supremacist has clearly veered far fucking away from being a rational debate

you sir

are a nut job dipshit

3/8/2006 12:46:04 PM

Quote :

"any discussion where one individual suggests God is a white supremacist has clearly veered far fucking away from being a rational debate"

Would you say God is an "Israelite supremacist"?

3/8/2006 12:50:45 PM

NO

3/8/2006 12:51:11 PM

new covenant dawg

love it
live it

3/8/2006 12:52:18 PM

Quote :

"NO"

Let me ask you this. Say there are a group of whites who believe that whites should maintain their racial purity, remain separate from the other races (ie, racial segregation), and live in their own nations apart from the other races.

Would you consider those people "white supremacists"?

3/8/2006 12:59:04 PM

Quote :

"Would you consider those people "white supremacists"?"

Actually, "nutjob dipshits" comes to mind.

[Edited on March 8, 2006 at 1:40 PM. Reason : [I'm always forgetting the "'s]

3/8/2006 1:27:58 PM

So if God had no problem destroying all these people in the olden days why isnt he doing shit about it now?

3/8/2006 1:28:59 PM

Quote :

"Actually, nutjob dipshits comes to mind."

Why? What is wrong with whites wanting to maintain their racial purity, remain separate from the other races, or live in their own nations apart from the other races?

3/8/2006 1:42:04 PM

go find yourself an all white nation where everyone agrees with that, salisburydouche.

i challenge you to do so.

3/8/2006 1:43:38 PM

Quote :

"What is wrong with whites wanting to maintain their racial purity, remain separate from the other races, or live in their own nations apart from the other races?"

Did I say anything was wrong with it? No.

The fact that only a "nutjob dipshit" would want to live on Whitey Island isn't hard to prove.

3/8/2006 1:45:58 PM

Quote :

"Did I say anything was wrong with it? No. The fact that only a "nutjob dipshit" would want to live on Whitey Island isn't hard to prove."

So there isn't anything wrong with those beliefs (ie, the beliefs are perfectly legitimate), but those who hold those beliefs are still "nutjob dipshits" according to you? Why? Because such beliefs do not conform to the multiculturalist/diversity dogma emanating from the establishment media/Hollywood/academia/etc?

Quote :

"go find yourself an all white nation where everyone agrees with that, salisburydouche."

You may be surprised to discover that many, many white people would prefer to live in all white countries apart from the other races. Most people practice racial segregation in their personal lives and live around and associate almost exclusively with those of their own race. Look at churches, for example. They are heavily segregated. That is how it has been throughout history. People of common ancestry and culture live and form nations together. Forcing those of different races and cultures together does not work and never has. It leads to discord, conflict, and ultimately war (eg, see Balkan region for recent example).

3/8/2006 2:03:00 PM

Quote :

"So there isn't anything wrong with those beliefs (ie, the beliefs are perfectly legitimate)"

Quit putting words in my mouth. I didn't voice my opinion of those beliefs.
I didn't say the beliefs were wrong or right.

Those who are educated (as I assume you are) and still hold those beliefs are still "nutjob dipshits"

Quote :

"Why?"

You know exactly why.

3/8/2006 2:13:52 PM

Quote :

"You know exactly why"

I have an idea...

Quote :

"Because such beliefs do not conform to the multiculturalist/diversity dogma emanating from the establishment media/Hollywood/academia/etc"

Quote :

"Those who are educated (as I assume you are) and still hold those beliefs are still "nutjob dipshits""

You mean those who have been brainwashed into the cult of multiculturalism and diversity by the high priests in the establishment academia? Or those "sophisticated" souls who bow to the cult as espoused by the NY Times, Hollywood, MSM, and the other Jewish/Zionist mouthpieces?

Needless to say, the government/establishment public schools did not produce the intended product in my case.

3/8/2006 2:34:42 PM

OH NOES

NOT DIVERSITY

ANYTHING BUT THAT

3/8/2006 2:39:32 PM

You will "celebrate diversity." Learn to love it. And if you don't, then you're an "evil bigotted hate-mongering xenophobic racist white supremacist" (did I leave any smear label out?)

3/8/2006 2:47:25 PM

"nutjob dipshit"

keep on living under that old covenant

you and the Isrealite Vikings keep on keepin' on

3/8/2006 2:49:12 PM

Quote :

"keep on living under that old covenant"

There is a new covenant, but to think that all the Old Testament laws and commandments are obsolete is mistaken:

Quote :

"Matthew 5:17-19 "Think not that I am come to destroy the law, or the prophets: I am not come to destroy, but to fulfil. For verily I say unto you, Till heaven and earth pass, one jot or one tittle shall in no wise pass from the law, till all be fulfilled. Whosoever therefore shall break one of these least commandments, and shall teach men so, he shall be called the least in the kingdom of heaven: but whosoever shall do and teach them, the same shall be called great in the kingdom of heaven." Malachi 3:6 "For I am the LORD, I change not""

And what basis would you have for claiming that the commandments specifically regarding racial purity and segregation are no logner applicable?

3/8/2006 2:58:05 PM

Quote :

"Needless to say, the government/establishment public schools did not produce the intended product in my case"

Says the guy who works for the City Government. HAHA. I bet your black co-workers talk about you.

3/8/2006 3:08:13 PM

I'M NOT AN ISREALITE

3/8/2006 3:08:49 PM

So I'm betting that salisburyboy doesn't eat fig newtons - wonder if he eats lobster?

3/8/2006 3:21:08 PM

yeah salisbury. you like the pork barbecue, don't you?

3/8/2006 3:26:53 PM

<chirp chirp chirp chirp chirp chirp>

3/8/2006 3:29:32 PM

i bet he loves mixing meat and dairy

HAM AND CHEESE WHAT WHAT

(wait, thats a double plus ungood right there)

3/8/2006 3:30:53 PM

i mean come on

you can't live that close to lexington and not like bbq

3/8/2006 3:34:16 PM

fuck yo western style bbq

3/8/2006 3:36:04 PM

Can we get back to why whites who want to preserve their race and live separate from the other races among themselves in their own nations are so "evil"?

I really want to hear from your perspective why you think these beliefs are "wrong" (or not).

3/8/2006 3:37:45 PM

no no no

you're not getting off that easy

you said that the original rules of the old testament still apply

so answer the question. do you eat pork, shellfish, or any other food that is against the rules?

3/8/2006 3:39:37 PM

Quote :

"why whites who want to preserve their race and live separate from the other races among themselves in their own nations are so "evil"?"

Who said they were "evil"? I think they might actually be blissful - if you catch my drift.

I'm just wondering if you eat figs, pork or crustaceans?

3/8/2006 3:41:25 PM

CLASSIC SALISBURY RIGHT HERE FOLKS

DRAW ATTENTION TO THE STUFF THAT FITS YOUR ARGUMENT

DRAW AWAY FROM THE STUFF THAT DAMAGES IT

3/8/2006 3:47:38 PM

<chirp                   chirp                   chirp                   chirp             chirp>

3/8/2006 3:52:51 PM

The real question is... does he wear polyblend clothing.

Leviticus says it's an abomination, ya know.

3/8/2006 3:53:16 PM

Quote :

"DRAW AWAY FROM THE STUFF THAT DAMAGES IT"

And this line of questioning is not drawing attention away from the primary topic of the thread?

Quote :

"do you eat pork, shellfish, or any other food that is against the rules?"

I try my best not to because I realize that those rules were made for a reason (ie, those foods are probably not good for you). I do not eat shellfish or lobster, and I can't remember the last time I ate pork.

[Edited on March 8, 2006 at 3:54 PM. Reason : ```````````]

3/8/2006 3:54:20 PM

Quote :

"I try my best not to because I realize that those rules were made for a reason (ie, those foods are probably not good for you)."

So that's why those rules were made? Why didn't God just destroy those creatures?

What about figs?

[Edited on March 8, 2006 at 4:05 PM. Reason : [fig newtons are tasty]

3/8/2006 3:55:48 PM

Do you shave?

Also a no-no.

3/8/2006 3:56:19 PM

Quote :

"What about figs?"

no

3/8/2006 3:57:44 PM

look Salisburyboy has a lot of iffy topics but this one does have some legitimacy.

First, he is very correct that the bible terms things in ways we were consider racist today. Back then, there were not laws like today. There were very very few. There were lots of issues with having children from outside your heritage. Add to the fact that you want "your" people to become stronger... god's children, what better way than to keep within your own.

Secondly, God is ruthless. Read the bible. He loved his children and was a fucking nightmare to anyone who didn't agree with him. You're a roman? hehe you're fucked. Pagan? Nice knowing your ass. It's the same viewpoint most religious extremeists take now.

Lastly, the bible and the Kuran teach many of the same lessons but in different ways of revering the same supreme being. The people in the middle east are fighting over right to territory that noone can agree or prove either way owns. Each believes they are in the right religiously and legally. Their hatred is racistly based stemming from God him/it/her self.

3/8/2006 3:57:53 PM

you don't eat figs, pork or shellfish? ok.

but do you shave?

3/8/2006 4:05:20 PM

^^but you don't think the Norse were the true Isrealites do you?
cause this motherfucker does


----
now back to the nutjob dipshit himself:

have you ever worn any blends?

leviticus 19:19 is a bitch son

and following God isn't something you "try"
not to sound like Yoda
but it doesn't matter if you can't remember the last time you ate pork
if there is a last time

unless of course you've made a blood sacrifice

[Edited on March 8, 2006 at 4:14 PM. Reason : `]

3/8/2006 4:12:55 PM

<chirp                   chirp                   chirp                   chirp             chirp>

3/8/2006 4:14:40 PM

i wonder if salisburyboy has ever touched a woman who happens to be on her period

3/8/2006 4:19:11 PM

Quote :

"you're not getting off that easy you said that the original rules of the old testament still apply"

What I said was that not all of the Old Testament laws and commandments are obsolete.

I didn't say that all of the Old Testament laws apply.



[Edited on March 8, 2006 at 4:35 PM. Reason : ```````````````]

3/8/2006 4:22:49 PM

lol

3/8/2006 4:24:18 PM

and of course

you get to play judge

you've totally touched a girl who has her period haven't you

3/8/2006 4:28:07 PM

Quote :

"I did NOT say that. What I said was that not all of the Old Testament laws and commandments are obsolete."

So which ones are obsolete, which ones aren't - and who decides?

3/8/2006 4:31:18 PM

WAIT JUST A MINUTE

3/8/2006 4:32:08 PM

Quote :

"NO. I did NOT say that. What I said was that not all of the Old Testament laws and commandments are obsolete."

ahahahahahahahaha

and i suppose you get to pick and decide.

ol' god is up there right now saying "i have all these rules. but as long as they abide by 63% of them, they're in."

[Edited on March 8, 2006 at 4:34 PM. Reason : *]

3/8/2006 4:33:12 PM

its not him deciding

he leaves that up to prisonplanet

3/8/2006 4:35:05 PM

i have to ask

so.... which rules still apply and which don't nowdays, salisbury?

i'm really keen to hear the answer to this

3/8/2006 4:41:39 PM

Quote :

"So which ones are obsolete, which ones aren't - and who decides?"

Quote :

"Why don't you tell me? Don't you have all the answers?"

3/8/2006 4:48:59 PM