Just a question.

3/5/2006 4:06:42 PM

that is already like the most of any message board system ever

[Edited on March 5, 2006 at 4:45 PM. Reason : .]

3/5/2006 4:45:38 PM

yeah really, most other places that i post is either 10 or 25

3/5/2006 5:33:27 PM

Why not make it like 1000?

3/5/2006 5:36:40 PM

god damn i hope you like scrolling

3/5/2006 7:02:39 PM

i just realized that the title said threads and not posts

but the same logic applies

fuck no

3/5/2006 7:08:25 PM

i think 50 is just right

3/6/2006 3:08:39 AM

i hate waiting on pages to load, more per page means less pages to go through.

3/6/2006 11:34:14 AM

Uh, it's the same amount of data either way. If you put more on a page, you'll have to wait longer for each individual page load.

3/6/2006 12:41:34 PM

Uh, actually, if you are interested in, uh, say, uh, the first 75 threads, it's actually less data transmitted if you had 75 threads per page than if you had 50+50/2 pages, uh, I think.

Did I sound too much like a know-it-all prick there?

3/6/2006 1:02:03 PM

too bad that number isnt as concrete as you'd like. it isnt really a problem for anywhere but chit chat either and even then if you are that far behind you might as well not post.

3/6/2006 2:00:14 PM

^^Oh cool. An extremely specific case to rebut a very general point. Stop post-stalking me, faggot.

3/6/2006 2:05:05 PM

less data is transmitted now - b/c the majority of people only look at the last 50 threads - a much smaller percentage looks at threads past that on a normal basis - you are an idiot to think otherwise

3/6/2006 3:00:36 PM

You could also modify the script that only x threads are shown instead. This could actually be used to decrease the amount of data sent if x was 10 or 20.

3/6/2006 6:59:27 PM

So you're saying this can't be done and isn't a good idea. I was thinking this could be like a preference thing, like google results per page.

3/6/2006 7:19:13 PM

if anything it would be made less to cut down on traffic - especially in places like feedback forums and study hall

3/6/2006 9:32:40 PM