how can this be made possible? would the constitution have to be amended? he's the Greatest president we've had in ages and times are too pivotal to go with another administration.

4/19/2006 8:52:44 PM

this is a joke, right?

buckets anyway.

4/19/2006 8:55:08 PM

no. I'm God Damn serious, G. he's the best thing to happen to this country in years. he did more to seperate the left from the righteous since Barry Goldwater. Either you're with us or you're with them.


Proud to be a Republican/American,



Amsterdam718

4/19/2006 8:57:56 PM

I hear he's hiring.

Put in an application.

You'd make an AWESOME Press Secretary.

Also, campaign heavily.

4/19/2006 9:41:36 PM

some people still don't see any of his faults and it's sad

4/19/2006 9:41:53 PM

Quote :

" he did more to seperate the left from the righteous since Barry Goldwater"

Yes, in a sense (Ronald Reagan notwithstanding).

However, President Bush is about as politically related to Barry Goldwater as Ted Kennedy is.

4/19/2006 9:56:33 PM

this guy, Bush, is totally unqualified for this job

i think that basically sums up all the problems that have happened in the last 6 years

4/19/2006 9:58:39 PM

^ read some Ann Coulter you leftist. Bush brought more people together than ever w/in the last 6 years. He's the unifier. You should look at it from a different perspective, not from the media and Hollywood. don't let TV corrupt you.

4/19/2006 10:01:11 PM

ok

is this serious or trolling?

4/19/2006 10:04:56 PM

This has to be trolling, G.

4/19/2006 10:06:42 PM

obvious trolling

4/19/2006 10:07:59 PM

why would this be trolling? since when is being a Bush supporter trolling. i think that's a part of the problem. I support Bush and I make an argument that he should get a 3rd term.


i am serious, people.

4/19/2006 10:14:12 PM

uh huh

4/19/2006 10:15:16 PM

because even the most die-hard Bush supporter wouldn't characterize him as a "unifier"...and the Ann Coulter plug doesn't win you any credibility points...and indirect comparison to Barry Goldwater is applicable only in that both men, with respect to their opposition, were polarizing figures (i.e., NOT unifiers)

4/19/2006 10:17:58 PM

Quote :

"because even the most die-hard Bush supporter wouldn't characterize him as a "unifier"..."

pardon me DUKE, but have you seen the red states. if that's not unifying the country I don't know what is. as far as Ann Coulter, point taken she is a crazed b!tch and all, but I appreciate that she tackled the problems of liberals in the country. YES ! she's a radical b!tch and very off based sometimes . . . but at least she's raising eyebrows. sometimes you have to stir the pot (no pun).

4/19/2006 10:22:17 PM

If you can name one thing Bush has done to improve anything for the average American, I would honestly be surprised. This coming from an ex-Republican Bush voter.

4/19/2006 10:26:22 PM

Quote :

"he's the Greatest president we've had in ages"

Barbara Effing Bush wouldn't even say that.

4/19/2006 10:27:07 PM

Quote :

"but have you seen the red states. if that's not unifying the country I don't know what is."

clearly that is the problem.

you don't know what unifying the country is.

4/19/2006 10:31:48 PM

soooooooooooooo, was TheBigL your alias?

4/19/2006 10:58:34 PM

Quote :

"If you can name one thing Bush has done to improve anything for the average American, I would honestly be surprised. This coming from an ex-Republican Bush voter."

I'm not on the side of "Bush is a great president" but this is a difficult thing to pinpoint for any president ever. Its easy to point to decisions they made that sucked balls, but its hard to give people credit for what they did right. For instance, some people think Clinton balanced the budget, others think it was Congress, and others think it is the general economy of the time (read: bubble).

Its difficult to find a single president-created decision that improves the lives of average Americans.

And IMO, I wish he would have stuck with the Privatization of Social Security as his legacy. I think in 40 years, people would have found that to be one of the best things this country has ever done. Unfortunately, Congress won't get on board because they cater to special-interest groups too much (because they need term limits).

4/19/2006 11:01:34 PM

what i dont understand are the serious responses in this thread.

4/19/2006 11:33:47 PM

^ I can say numerous things Clinton did right for a total score of 0:
Positive: Signed Welfare Reform
Positive: Supported and even defended NAFTA
Positive: Actually encouraged congress to retain PAYGO
Negative: raised taxes to their highest level in 30 years
Negative: Campaign Finance Reform and the errosion of free-speech
Negative: allowed the vindictive and destructive prosecution of Microsoft

What has Bush done for us? Attained a total score of -1:
Positive: Cut taxes
Positive: Further spread the frontiers of Free-Trade
Negative: Allowed and even encouraged a spending explosion
Negative: McCain Feingold and the errosion of free-speech
Negative: FUCKING INVADED IRAQ

All in all, to the best of my ability, Clinton was a better president to have than Bush has been. But it only goes to prove that intentions and results are often at odds

4/19/2006 11:49:09 PM

i like lonesnark's method.
we should expand this to all presidents and all issues.
im excited

4/20/2006 12:24:42 AM

Quote :

"He's the unifier"

What hes unified is the right with the far-right.

I don't know ANY republicans (and I actually have a few that i consider friends) that think Bush is anywhere near the best president we've ever had.

And just in case this guy is serious...

The 22 amendment to the Constitution would need to be repealed. It was passed in 1951 or something like that. FDR went 4 (was it four?) terms.

4/20/2006 1:29:33 AM

He was in his fourth when he died.

4/20/2006 1:31:49 AM

Let's blame one person for all our country's problems. That'll work.

4/20/2006 1:44:23 AM

4/20/2006 3:15:17 AM

Quote :

"I wish he would have stuck with the Privatization of Social Security as his legacy. "

yeah. that was a brilliant idea.

4/20/2006 4:47:19 AM

Quote :

"What hes unified is the right with the far-right."

How do you figure that?

4/20/2006 7:09:09 AM

Quote :

"pardon me DUKE, but have you seen the red states. if that's not unifying the country I don't know what is."

You have got to be kidding, G. A lot of those red states include the poorer rural areas where there is less $ to go around for things like education. Less education allows for a friendler atmosphere for concepts like gullibility, something this administration has capitalized on.

Im not saying everyone who has lived or was educated in a red state is a sucker, but I am saying that there are enough of them to swing the tide when you add in the tendency for rural areas to be more conservative. Why do you think there were so many who actually believed the crap that 9/11=Iraq?

4/20/2006 7:18:10 AM

so are you saying N.Carolina (a red state) is comprised of "suckers". bullsh!t this is one of the most intellectual regions in the country.

i really think we should end the trend of liberalism being cool. it's destroying the country. i'm cool and I happen to be a Republican and Bush supporter.

you guys are biased, G.

4/20/2006 10:39:12 AM

ok, obviously this is fake

4/20/2006 10:47:52 AM

Quote :

"no. I'm God Damn serious, G. he's the best thing to happen to this country in years. he did more to seperate the left from the righteous since Barry Goldwater. Either you're with us or you're with them. Proud to be a Republican/American, Amsterdam718"

that's so anti-American I don't even know what to say to it

4/20/2006 12:49:36 PM

Quote :

"so are you saying N.Carolina (a red state) is comprised of "suckers". bullsh!t this is one of the most intellectual regions in the country. "

ok that made it a joke.

4/21/2006 8:34:11 AM

what i dont understand are the serious responses in this thread.

4/21/2006 8:47:04 AM

^^ there's like 12 colleges in raleigh/durham alone. don't forget davidson and other good schools. you anti-republicans are biased, G. you won't even acknowledge the other side. are there any bush supporters out there on tww. ???????????????????????????????????????????

4/21/2006 10:01:32 AM

Amsterdam hates our freedoms.

4/21/2006 10:12:26 AM

Man, I was a Bush supporter. I was the frigging chairman of the college republicans. I cannot support the president. He's gone way left on fiscal policy, does nothing about the immigration problem, and squandered the chance to become the second Ronald Reagan.

He is a thundering disappointment. If Bush ran in 2008, I would not vote for him. I am a lifelong Conservative. My membership in the republican party has been dropped. Until the party returns to the roots of fiscal conservatism, I will not return to the party.

4/21/2006 10:25:27 AM

Quote :

"so are you saying N.Carolina (a red state) is comprised of "suckers". bullsh!t this is one of the most intellectual regions in the country."

Have you been to Gastonia or West Lincoln?

4/21/2006 10:29:12 AM

(no homo)

4/21/2006 10:33:02 AM

Quote :

"so are you saying N.Carolina (a red state) is comprised of "suckers". bullsh!t this is one of the most intellectual regions in the country."

No. I specificaly stated to the contrary. Im referring to secondary education, which is completly state funded, not post-secondary education, which is only supported in part by the state. And exactly how many of the state's population has attended/finished college? That ratio is my point.

You need to stop inferring what isn't there, B.

4/21/2006 4:57:05 PM

this can not be fucking serious

especially the part about Bush being a unifier.

the country hasn't been this divided since 1860.

4/21/2006 5:52:04 PM

^ that's a joke.

Try 1964. And throughout vietnam.

4/21/2006 6:05:20 PM

^ we're making a list of times conservatives were fuck nuts

4/21/2006 7:12:03 PM

fuck ann coulter
and bill o'reilly
and george bush

stupid motherfucker

4/21/2006 7:22:22 PM

^^^I'm well aware of that.

I'd say it's more divided now than it was then.

4/21/2006 7:56:42 PM

Quote :

"so are you saying N.Carolina (a red state) is comprised of "suckers". bullsh!t this is one of the most intellectual regions in the country.""

LOL.

yeah, i will say, RTP area is relatively intellectual. to say, Sanford. Or Rocky Mount.

but the whole state? compared to the country? what, you mean like relative to Mississippi?

4/22/2006 10:34:21 PM

Bush vs Clinton(Bill) 2008, Bill would kill him.

[Edited on April 23, 2006 at 2:26 AM. Reason : .]

4/23/2006 2:26:08 AM

4/23/2006 8:16:45 AM

This thread has to be a joke.

4/23/2006 3:10:56 PM