http://www.saw3.com/
http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0489270/

oh boy! I bet this one will have people and traps in it!

5/15/2006 10:30:42 PM

the first one was great, the second one was a huge let down, but I guess this goes with the horror genre

5/15/2006 10:36:32 PM

they announced this like 2 days after SAW II

5/15/2006 10:37:29 PM

yes...but there were no threads about it..so no need to jump all on my balls tonight...cyrion.

5/15/2006 10:38:27 PM

SORRY THAT I DONT LIKE SEEING 100 VIDEO GAME THREADS ON THE SAME SHIT. THIS THREAD IS FINE even if the movie wont be out forever.

5/15/2006 10:44:49 PM

the doctor is in it

he was the one that did surgery at the beginning of the second movie

that's the huge twist

5/15/2006 10:50:21 PM

Quote :

"they announced this like 2 days after SAW II"

they announced this to me at the end of Saw 2 once you realize jigsaw's "legacy" was going to continue

5/16/2006 12:21:29 AM

the second one was bad enough!

5/16/2006 12:48:31 AM

Why do you people think that the second one was bad? I've seen both, and I really liked the second one. Not as much as I liked the first one, but I still thought it was pretty good.

5/16/2006 2:27:07 AM

i thought the second one was better than the first/ most everyone i've talked to did too.

5/16/2006 2:40:30 AM

both were really lame
but everybody wants their own "omg its like Seven, only more XXxTreme!"

5/16/2006 3:03:01 AM

i thought that the first one sucked

thus i didn't see the second

5/16/2006 3:24:49 AM

meh... the first one was stupid too... i have no desire to even see the second one... and will probably forget about the third one

5/16/2006 8:04:36 AM

so... are we looking at a modern day Friday the 13th, Halloween, or Nightmare on Elmstreetish series?

will it go the distance into crappy cable syndication... eventually leading to some battle between it and Hannibal Lecter?

[Edited on May 16, 2006 at 8:17 AM. Reason : (i shouldn't pair those two, but i couldn't think of anyone else off the top of my head)]

5/16/2006 8:17:23 AM

Quote :

"will it go the distance into crappy cable syndication... eventually leading to some battle between it and Hannibal Lecter?"

There are actually horror movies that have done this?

5/16/2006 9:35:46 AM

freddie vs. jason

5/16/2006 9:37:10 AM

I like 'em both. I worry about a third one, but I'll probably watch it because it's the closest thing to a good new horror franchise there is.

5/16/2006 9:46:55 AM

Oh, of course.

But by cable syndication I thought you meant that they became a regular TV series or something.

5/16/2006 9:47:02 AM

They did. Freddy's Nightmares was a Tales From the Crypt type of show that was awful, and SciFi ran a Friday the 13th: The Series that was entirely unrelated, but definitely trying to make bank off of the idea that Jason could show up at any moment.

(Nonsequitor: I think Jason X is a fantastic movie)

5/16/2006 9:50:21 AM

naw... my bad, poor choice of words...

by crappy cable syndication i meant reshowing all the shitty movies of the series on cable all the fucking time...

^ i had no fucking clue about that... but it does sounds shitty as hell...

[Edited on May 16, 2006 at 9:52 AM. Reason : .]

5/16/2006 9:52:00 AM

shit

i'll be seeing it

5/16/2006 10:08:10 AM

^^You have no idea just how shitty those shows were. Which makes you luckier than me, a dork who watched them pretty consistently with the idea that "THIS one will be the one that makes it all worth it." Retarded. I know.

I doubt that we'll ever see Jigsaw hosting a showcase short horror stories or any other type of non-movie bearing Saw's name. But we will probably be seeing Saw IV on USA on Saturday afternoons in 2014.

[Edited on May 16, 2006 at 10:29 AM. Reason : ]

5/16/2006 10:27:40 AM

The jason X comment

I agree. I cannot readily recall a time in my life where i have laughed harder than when those two topless chicks start making out and hitting on jason and he just fucking snaps and in the next cut he's beating them against a tree inside their sleeping bags

5/16/2006 10:31:52 AM

Agreed. "Ouch. Ouch." Hilarious. Done hijacking the thread now. Promise.

5/16/2006 10:32:41 AM

i like in Jason in Manhattan...that boxer is boxing him on the rooftop...damn, dude almost had him

5/16/2006 10:39:39 AM

I'll see it...I loved both the 1st and the 2nd films.

You folks who bash on it just because bashing something popular is "cool" are retards. It is possible that a movie that does extremely well at the box office is actually halfway decent...I know that's shocking and all.

Everyone's entitled to their own opinion on a film, but it's just painfully obvious some of these remarks are just made to be bashing what's in.

5/16/2006 11:46:27 AM

link in case the image doesnt show up:
http://www.filmwad.com/photo.phtml?post_key=569&photo_key=658

6/28/2006 4:44:02 PM

thats it

i aint seein this

fuck dentist

6/28/2006 4:57:55 PM

Quote :

"Why do you people think that the second one was bad? I've seen both, and I really liked the second one. Not as much as I liked the first one, but I still thought it was pretty good."

i really liked the second one.

and we MIGHT be able to display that poster. We were forced to take down a couple of previous Saw and Saw II posters due to "graphic violence" in the poster.

6/28/2006 5:12:53 PM

Oh my god, with a cover like that... I'm terrified already. Exactly, fuck the dentist

6/28/2006 6:11:31 PM

as far as sequels go, Saw 2 impressed me more than i expected it would.... i'll definitely watch Saw 3

6/28/2006 7:14:46 PM

dude, the pit of syringe scene

6/28/2006 10:00:39 PM

i lol'd

6/28/2006 10:05:15 PM

didn't the original director or producer die after making Saw II?? wonder if that'll have an effect on the quality of the 3rd.

6/29/2006 8:15:16 AM

i have yet to see SAW

6/29/2006 1:54:23 PM

It looked like they ran out of money towards the end of Saw II. The quality went downhill fast.

6/29/2006 2:01:20 PM

YET TO SEE SAW ROTFLMAO


.....ahem

6/29/2006 2:14:39 PM

i thought the old dude in the first one was like dying of cancer, i mean i can understand the first sequel but i figured he would have died by now

6/29/2006 5:44:38 PM

maybe my theater will get robbed during the prescreening of this one like we did during saw 2

6/29/2006 5:46:56 PM

odd poster...

definitely not worthy of being "banned from postings" though, so that's good

6/29/2006 8:14:58 PM

^^^ ahh, cancer can be very slow. Years sometimes. Not to mention it can go into remission then come back. So it's not that hard to believe. Also, consider the genre, i don't think they really care. the plot of this one is that he's on his death bed and his apprentice (the girl in the second one) kidnaps a doctor to keep him alive just long enough for him to see one of his victims finish one of his puzzles, or so it seems.

I'll at least rent it, the first two were decent enough.

6/30/2006 1:34:16 AM

I liked the second as much if not better than the first

6/30/2006 7:52:30 AM

Or who's to say that the girl isn't running the show in Saw III?

6/30/2006 1:21:11 PM

Quote :

"Plot Outline: Torture-friendly serial killer Jigsaw continues to "teach" those who are undeserving of life alongside his new apprentice. "

Quote :

"Jigsaw has disappeared. With his new apprentice Amanda (Shawnee Smith), the puppet-master behind the cruel, intricate games that have terrified a community and baffled police has once again eluded capture and vanished. While city detectives scramble to locate him, Doctor Lynn Denlon (Bahar Soomekh) is unaware that she is about to become the latest pawn on his vicious chessboard. One night, after finishing a shift at her hospital, Lynn is kidnapped and taken to an abandoned warehouse where she meets Jigsaw (Tobin Bell), bedridden and on the verge of death. She is told that she must keep the madman alive for as long as it takes Jeff (Angus Macfayden), another of his victims, to complete a game of his own. Racing against the ticking clock of Jigsaw's own heartbeat, Lynn and Jeff struggle to make it through each of their vicious tests, unaware that he has a much bigger plan for both of them"

[Edited on June 30, 2006 at 1:29 PM. Reason : .]

6/30/2006 1:28:27 PM

sounds good enough for me

'cept niggas name is ANGUS?! WTF?

6/30/2006 1:43:53 PM

hey that sounds good enough

i'll watch

6/30/2006 1:49:24 PM

Quote :

"Comic-Con 2006: Saw III Cuts Loose Lionsgate debuts exclusive footage. by Stax July 21, 2006 - Lionsgate debuted new footage from their forthcoming horror flick Saw III at Comic-Con International in San Diego on Thursday. The clip accompanied a panel attended by cast members Tobin Bell and Shawnee Smith, writer Leigh Whannell, director Darren Lynn Bousman and producers Mark Burg and Oren Koules. The footage shown was a scene where an ex-convict named Troy is chained inside what appears to be a classroom. Troy is the unfortunate pawn in Jigsaw's latest game. "This game will take place in a room not much bigger than the room you've spent most of your life in," Jigsaw advises the frightened ex-con via a television feed. "Despite all the privileges you were given at birth, you returned to prison again and again." Troy has chains pierced through his hands, feet, lip, chest and back. "It's time to see how far you're willing to go to break those chains, once and for all," Jigsaw says. A beat-the-clock scenario then ensues where the ex-con must rips the chains from his flesh as the seconds run down. Blood gushes from the horrific wounds the ex-con inflicts upon himself while trying to escape his grim fate. Lionsgate also confirmed that the teaser trailer for Saw III will debut in theaters with the August 4th release of the studio's The Descent."

7/21/2006 12:57:11 PM

sweet

7/21/2006 1:29:34 PM

awesome, thats soon.

7/21/2006 1:53:10 PM

Quote :

"Or who's to say that the girl isn't running the show in Saw III?"

the ending to Saw 2 said that she would be

7/21/2006 7:10:34 PM