http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hNxhrPaaCA4

who will win?

6/11/2006 2:57:45 AM

i can tell you who wont win

everyone who clicks on this thread

6/11/2006 3:10:15 AM

They'll at least maybe get a runner up prize though.

6/11/2006 3:11:28 AM

GD it. Must you people bring this arguement up time after time!

6/11/2006 3:56:18 AM

shitty and not nearly funny

6/11/2006 10:01:20 AM

6/11/2006 11:40:51 AM

that wasn't very good.

good concept, poorly excecuted.


and why would it be JUST the enterprise fighting against the entire imperial fleet?

6/11/2006 11:44:36 AM

6/11/2006 11:50:42 AM

Haha i think it was decent considering they were just using stock footage

6/11/2006 12:05:58 PM

star wars>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>star trek



[Edited on June 11, 2006 at 12:11 PM. Reason : asdfg]

6/11/2006 12:10:57 PM

I do beleive this picture will prove that the size of this ships clearly indicated the winner.

6/11/2006 12:15:56 PM

hardly.

6/11/2006 12:27:02 PM

are we really doing this again?

6/11/2006 12:30:55 PM

not to mention theres an even bigger star destroyer than the executor

6/11/2006 12:34:58 PM

Star Wars wins, always. Even the nerd could kick star trek nerd's asses

6/11/2006 12:38:59 PM

just because a ship is bigger doesn't mean it is better.

6/11/2006 5:51:32 PM

Sure is a hell of alot more hull to cut through. And none of the weapons on either side are obviously more powerfule. Therefore SW winz.

Although Power Rangers might give them a run for their money.

6/11/2006 7:05:23 PM

Wow. You guys are actually arguing about it. Again.

6/11/2006 7:15:50 PM

Why can't you people just debate normal topics?



You know, like whether Lois Lane's womb is capable of bearing Superman's baby.

6/11/2006 7:18:34 PM

You actually think it would survive the initial cum shot?

6/11/2006 7:32:28 PM

how you going to beat Q?

6/11/2006 7:36:43 PM

Look at the facts: Batman can get into any set of panties that he wants. Superman is still trying to get to first base with Lois Lane.

You figure out what's "super."

6/11/2006 8:13:19 PM

Anyone that works out as much as superman is self consious about the size of his super small wang.

6/11/2006 8:54:43 PM

nerdgasm

6/11/2006 9:06:39 PM

why is it that the two series are solely judged by which one has the biggest ships/deadliest weapons? Star Trek (even some of the more recent stuff) is far more sophisticated than star wars could ever hope to be, wars is more for your slightly below average simpleminded joe who desires to avoid thinking as much as possible. Trek covers the whole spectrum of the human condition, war peace diplomacy politics religion morality and the advancement of science and technology for more than just blowing up things.

6/11/2006 9:35:32 PM

there is no question that the scientific rhetoric in TNG is superior to star wars, one can the conclude, the trek universe is scientifically superior, and therefor, would have superior weapons.

also, having huge ship causes major technical issue -- the small ships would be deadly, as they would be more nimble and more structurally sounds. a large ship, unless structured like a borg cube that could regenerate, would have portions that are just as susceptible to damage, thus by doing the same amount of damage to an area of a large ship and a small ship, would have a more devastating effect becuase the larger ship would require more people to operate. in sum, you could do more human and tactical damage to a larger ships compared to smaller ones with the same amount of firepower bc all your eggs would be in that one basket -- thus making huge ship sizes a tactical mistake.

[Edited on June 11, 2006 at 9:43 PM. Reason : 5234]

6/11/2006 9:41:50 PM

Quote :

"star wars>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>star trek"

if you prefer space fantasy to actual sci fi I guess

6/11/2006 9:59:09 PM

Star Wars took place a long time ago, in a galaxy far, far away (500 BBY or something).

Star Trek, even in Enterprise, takes place in the future (2151 AD).

Assuming that more modern technology is always better, Star Trek wins.

6/11/2006 10:04:09 PM

Quote :

"Sure is a hell of alot more hull to cut through. And none of the weapons on either side are obviously more powerfule. Therefore SW winz."

Do you remember how they destroyed the Death Star in the movie? A well placed shot from the enterprise could wipe it out.

Plus, the tech. in Star Trek superior to star wars (they have transporters!), so I bet the weapons would be better too.

6/11/2006 10:13:25 PM

star trek vs. star wars is like saying James T. Kirk vs. Darth Vader , I mean come on......Warf vs. Yoda.......come on people use your heads

[Edited on June 11, 2006 at 10:39 PM. Reason : .]

6/11/2006 10:38:57 PM

Quote :

"there is no question that the scientific rhetoric in TNG is superior to star wars, one can the conclude, the trek universe is scientifically superior, and therefor, would have superior weapons."

Thats because they only have pussy ass scientists and academics in TNG.

There arnt any of those in star wars because they are on a research station building better weapons. The only thing you find on war cruisers in star wars IS MOTHERFUCKING SOILDERS TO KILL YOU WHILE YOU TALK ABOUT THE MORALITY OF EWOKS!!!111

6/11/2006 10:58:29 PM

are we pretending that star wars doesnt have any small ships then?

you guys are missing the biggest factor too. SW ships look much cooler in general, thus are better.

6/11/2006 11:13:00 PM

jedi, mastery of the Force, star wars deflects any technology star trek brings
lightsaber > phaser (spelling?)

6/11/2006 11:46:40 PM

The ships' technologies in Star Trek are FAR superior to what they've got in the Star Wars universe, but if you had any sort of man to man combat, SW would beat the ST asses.

6/11/2006 11:49:12 PM

Quote :

"you guys are missing the biggest factor too. SW ships look much cooler in general, thus are better."

6/12/2006 12:00:21 AM

Quote :

"Star Wars took place a long time ago, in a galaxy far, far away (500 BBY or something). Star Trek, even in Enterprise, takes place in the future (2151 AD). Assuming that more modern technology is always better, Star Trek wins."

Even in star trek they are constantly finding technology from long dead civilizations that is vastly superior to their own. the SW galaxy has something like 40,000 years of recorded history for just one civilization. the federation and the other major star trek powers have at most a few millenia and most have only been space borne for a few hundred...

This is really a toss-up though

SW advantages:
Numbers; the imperial fleet is said to have something like 20,000 star destroyers in one of the source materials. the federation could barely muster something like 700 ships for one of the bigger battles with the dominion (i know federation had more but we are talking about maybe 2,000 federation ships total) when taking into account federation, klingon, romulan, dominion, borg they'd still probably have way fewer numbers than imperial, republic, hapan, and the few other major SW powers.
Speed; SWs hyperdrives seem much much faster than ST warp speeds. SW universe uses their whole galaxy. ST universe takes 70+ years to travel from one quadrant to another
Superlasers; Death star type weapons are hard to beat
Force; not really that much of an advantage since jedi take a while to train and are few in number

ST advantages:
Technology; transporters alone would be able to win every single battle assuming SW shields operate on a different principle than ST shields and can be penetrated by transporters. ST weapons also appear much more accurate than their SW counterparts
Q; really not a fair advantage but if included would be an automatic win assuming jedi couldn't do something force related to somehow negate Q type powers
Borg; able to quickly adapt, probably only vulnerable to superlaser type weapons (not really anything to adapt to, 1 shot kills)


I enjoy both universes.

What about a SW, ST, babylon 5, battlestar galactica free-for-all?

6/12/2006 12:32:18 AM

Whoopi Goldberg was never in Star Wars



WINNER LUCAS!

6/12/2006 12:53:23 AM

http://www.stardestroyer.net/Empire/Essays/FiveMinutes.html

6/12/2006 1:06:55 AM

Quote :

"jedi, mastery of the Force, "

yea they win bc they have magic

there is no magic or made up forces in star trek, so when their universes colided, if they did, there
would be no 'force'

phaser/photon torpedos; these are based on physics, not magic.

[Edited on June 12, 2006 at 2:39 AM. Reason : 423432]

6/12/2006 2:38:35 AM

Event Horizon wins, everyone just goes to hell

6/12/2006 2:55:39 AM

^^by that logic, since there is no startrek in starwars, when their worlds combined, startrek would disappear.

also that spaceship jpg is way more fun than it should be

6/12/2006 3:17:18 AM

Nobody that has posted in this thread has ever gotten laid, by a woman.

6/12/2006 5:32:57 AM

NO U

6/12/2006 6:30:22 AM

YOU FORGOT ABOUT JOHN DE LANCIE

6/12/2006 8:03:48 AM

This is sad.

6/12/2006 8:07:09 AM

Quote :

"Nobody that has posted in this thread has ever gotten laid, by a woman. "

Uh, no

Quote :

"http://www.stardestroyer.net/Empire/Essays/FiveMinutes.html "

/thread

6/12/2006 9:32:57 AM

I think if you look at the power output per ship, even the weakest imperial warships destroy the Enterprise.

Furthermore, because Star Wars doesn't care about science and can make up whatever, TNG loses. Always.

6/12/2006 10:01:59 AM

magic doesnt trump reality

6/12/2006 10:22:35 AM

Real like star trek

6/12/2006 10:30:28 AM

real like not being magic

6/12/2006 10:34:50 AM