User not logged in - login - register
Home Calendar Books School Tool Photo Gallery Message Boards Users Statistics Advertise Site Info
go to bottom | |
 Message Boards » » Pulp Fiction Page [1]  
lafta
All American
14880 Posts
user info
edit post

ok no one in chit chat knows the answer.
Who wrote Pulp fiction?

and dont say tarantino.

9/26/2006 11:51:10 AM

Cif82
All American
10455 Posts
user info
edit post

tarantino and avary from what i remember, imdb it

9/26/2006 11:52:46 AM

wilso
All American
14657 Posts
user info
edit post

Writing credits
Quentin Tarantino (stories) &
Roger Avary (stories)

Quentin Tarantino (written by)

9/26/2006 11:52:47 AM

lafta
All American
14880 Posts
user info
edit post

so who wrote which parts

i have a feeling tarantino wrote the crappy parts

9/26/2006 11:57:12 AM

vinylbandit
All American
48079 Posts
user info
edit post

And which parts would those be (so we can get this shitty thread over with ASAP)?

9/26/2006 12:08:01 PM

Lokken
All American
13361 Posts
user info
edit post

all of them

9/26/2006 12:09:42 PM

CapnObvious
All American
5057 Posts
user info
edit post

I have no idea which scene Tarantino did. I just know that he completely mess up the ONE scene he directed in Sin City. It just COMPLETLEY broke with how the rest of the movie flowed.

I know! Let's turn the internal monologues that gave a strong, brooding feeling into a spoken monologue that makes the actor seem like he is rambling without a purpose. BRILLIANT!

That one scene is a taint on an otherwise fantastic movie.

9/26/2006 12:25:42 PM

Money_Jones
Ohhh Farts
12499 Posts
user info
edit post

Quote :
"Earlier in their careers, Tarantino and Avary had planned on making an anthology movie comprised of three short films; one written and directed by Avary, one written and directed by Tarantino, and one written and directed by a third filmmaker, reportedly Adam Rifkin. When the third filmmaker never materialized, Tarantino and Avary took their respective stories and expanded them into full length screenplays separately. Tarantino's story became Reservoir Dogs, and Avary's story became "Pandemonium Reigns". "Pandemonium Reigns" ended up forming the basis of the "Gold Watch" chapter of Pulp Fiction (an earlier version of his website displayed an excerpt from "Pandemonium Reigns", illustrating the changes that were made by Tarantino when writing "The Gold Watch"), and other odd scenes Avary had written were reworked and incorporated into the Pulp Fiction script, such as the accidental shooting of Marvin, and the scene in which the bullets fired at Jules and Vincent miss their targets (Avary claims both of these scenes were written for his rewrite of True Romance). Tarantino and Avary got together in Amsterdam shortly after the release of Reservoir Dogs, and pasted each other's scenes together into a first draft, after which Avary left to film Killing Zoe, and Tarantino took over subsequent writing of Pulp Fiction."

9/26/2006 12:37:10 PM

FeverRed
All American
8499 Posts
user info
edit post

Tarantino's scene in Four Rooms sucked, too.

9/26/2006 12:45:00 PM

Dentaldamn
All American
9974 Posts
user info
edit post

which part of Sin City did he do?

9/26/2006 1:42:33 PM

Cif82
All American
10455 Posts
user info
edit post

the part that sucks, are you NOT paying attention?

9/26/2006 1:45:01 PM

elkaybie
All American
39626 Posts
user info
edit post

which was his scene in four rooms?

9/26/2006 1:45:28 PM

stuck flex
All American
4566 Posts
user info
edit post

Tarantino haterade....so predictable

9/26/2006 1:57:24 PM

Dentaldamn
All American
9974 Posts
user info
edit post

this does me no good

9/26/2006 2:07:06 PM

wilso
All American
14657 Posts
user info
edit post

the part where homeboy is driving with the dead benecio el toro

er.. benicio del toro.

[Edited on September 26, 2006 at 2:09 PM. Reason : asdf]

9/26/2006 2:08:59 PM

Dentaldamn
All American
9974 Posts
user info
edit post

oh, didnt see how that sucked anymore than any rest of the film

9/26/2006 2:24:54 PM

wilso
All American
14657 Posts
user info
edit post

neither did i.

9/26/2006 2:34:40 PM

vinylbandit
All American
48079 Posts
user info
edit post

In fact, that scene is the only one with any life in it.

[Edited on September 26, 2006 at 2:40 PM. Reason : 2]

9/26/2006 2:39:08 PM

sarijoul
All American
14208 Posts
user info
edit post

IF IT'S NOT A DIRECT TRANSCRIPTION FROM A COMIC IT IS NOT A GOOD MOVIE!!!!111 HAVE YOU NOT BEEN PAYING ATTN TO THE ENTERTAINMENT SECTION RECENTLY!?!?!?!

9/26/2006 2:41:06 PM

chickenhead

47844 Posts
user info
edit post

i did

9/26/2006 3:02:40 PM

CapnObvious
All American
5057 Posts
user info
edit post

Quote :
"oh, didnt see how that sucked anymore than any rest of the film"


Think back to the scenes all the other scenes where the main character is narrating something. Its dark, even brooding, and there are some special sound tweeks that change the quality. The voices are also narrated in the background. This allows for the actors to voice "act" whenever they are giving their monolgues and also act in the scenes where the narration is added.

In the car scene, the monologues that the guy gives are done right there in that scene, not in the background. This is a complete break from the rest of the movie. It also doesn't work nearly as well. The guy comes off as a rambling buffoon. Imagine if Bruce Willis said "An old man dies, a little girl lives. . . fair trade" out loud as he lay dying after being shot. It would not have been NEARLY as effective.

[Edited on September 26, 2006 at 3:17 PM. Reason : are]

9/26/2006 3:16:59 PM

vinylbandit
All American
48079 Posts
user info
edit post

The Miller style is great on the page. It doesn't work so well as a direct translation to film. If it did, there wouldn't be hundreds of film noir parodies floating around the entertainment landscape. I don't think the Willis line would sound silly if it was delivered in dialogue, as long as the delivery is the same.

The fact is that Sin City is a beautiful visual film, but as a film experience it's lacking in vitality. Aside from a few other quick moments, the Tarantino scene is the only one in the film that reflects the energy and creativity that exist in the material itself.

9/26/2006 4:09:22 PM

lafta
All American
14880 Posts
user info
edit post

what i thought was the crappy part of pulp fiction was the hotel scenes with bruce willis, and the rest of the gold watch is very different from the rest of the movie.
what makes me wonder is aside from reservoir dogs his other movies dont even come close,
only when he's working with another director like robert rodriguez does his he make
memorable scenes.

[Edited on September 26, 2006 at 4:50 PM. Reason : .]

9/26/2006 4:49:46 PM

vinylbandit
All American
48079 Posts
user info
edit post

Wow. Just wow.

9/26/2006 5:00:35 PM

 Message Boards » Entertainment » Pulp Fiction Page [1]  
go to top | |
Admin Options : move topic | lock topic

© 2024 by The Wolf Web - All Rights Reserved.
The material located at this site is not endorsed, sponsored or provided by or on behalf of North Carolina State University.
Powered by CrazyWeb v2.38 - our disclaimer.