Coming soon...

10/15/2006 4:19:34 PM

dont think we need to worry about that right now at 3 and 3...maybe later

10/15/2006 4:23:07 PM

hahaahha
hahahaha
hahahaha


yea, I guess you dont do you?

10/15/2006 4:25:05 PM

If we defeat Mar,Vir then maybe. But we definitely should be ranked if we beat Gt. Fact.

10/15/2006 4:25:31 PM

aha, wtf is this

10/15/2006 4:26:08 PM

^^ are you fucking joking??? if you beat Maryland and Va, you should get a cookie. They are god awful. No maybe to it.

[Edited on October 15, 2006 at 4:26 PM. Reason : d]

10/15/2006 4:26:38 PM

You just don't WANT us to be ranked. Thats all.

10/15/2006 4:30:29 PM

1 Ohio State 7-0 1 2848 .000 1 1575 1.016 .000 4 .973
2 USC 6-0 2 2621 .000 2 1476 .952 .000 1 .956
3 Michigan 7-0 4 2557 .000 3 1430 .923 .000 20 .934
4 Auburn 6-1 10 1728 .000 7 1122 .724 .000 9 .748
5 West Virginia 6-0 5 2434 .000 4 1411 .910 .000 11 .745
6 Florida 6-1 3 2599 .000 10 1045 .674 .000 17 .738
7 Louisville 6-0 7 2181 .000 6 1205 .777 .000 19 .718
8 Notre Dame 5-1 9 1917 .000 8 1068 .689 .000 6 .694
9 Texas 6-1 6 2246 .000 5 1314 .848 .000 2 .684
10 California 6-1 11 1712 .000 11 981 .633 .000 0 .668
11 Tennessee 5-1 8 1959 .000 9 1060 .684 .000 0 .653
12 Clemson 6-1 12 1499 .000 12 896 .578 .000 0 .504
13 Arkansas 5-1 22 532 .000 18 532 .343 .000 0 .471
14 Oregon 5-1 20 822 .000 15 660 .426 .000 5 .449
15 Boise State 6-0 21 803 .000 17 575 .371 .000 0 .432
16 Rutgers 6-0 24 416 .000 19 415 .268 .000 0 .395
17 Nebraska 6-1 19 830 .000 16 596 .385 .000 0 .354
18 LSU 5-2 16 1035 .000 14 682 .440 .000 12 .350
19 Georgia Tech 5-1 15 1084 .000 13 703 .454 .000 24 .340
20 Boston College 5-1 25 204 .000 21 321 .207 .000 21 .259
21 Wisconsin 6-1 26 194 .000 22 288 .186 .000 18 .254
22 Oklahoma 4-2 23 430 .000 20 354 .228 .000 23 .158
23 Iowa 5-2 13 1244 .000 23 172 .111 .000 0 .070
24 Missouri 6-1 17 914 .000 27 89 .057 .000 0 .680
25 Tulsa

10/15/2006 4:33:19 PM

Cal above Tenn is a fucking sham

10/15/2006 4:33:42 PM

cal is ranked ahead of tennessee?

interesting

10/15/2006 4:35:30 PM

10/15/2006

10/15/2006 4:36:15 PM

we will be ranked after Gt.

10/15/2006 4:36:42 PM

lmao at the big east

10/15/2006 4:36:55 PM

^^ die.

^ what about it? 3 teams in the Top 16?

10/15/2006 4:41:27 PM

and they are all behind some one loss teams



sadly ranked and ncstate are two far away words right now. we need to win trhough clemson to be ranked

[Edited on October 15, 2006 at 4:44 PM. Reason : meh]

10/15/2006 4:43:04 PM

Screw NC State being ranked. It serves no purpose. Lets just make it through one game at a time.

10/15/2006 4:43:29 PM

yeah, the big east is in better shape than I thought they would be

10/15/2006 4:43:38 PM

Quote :

"and they are all behind some one loss teams"

Well that is because of the SOS. Pitt, RU, UL, and WVU haven't played each other yet at all. Once they do the SOS will shoot up..

10/15/2006 4:44:28 PM

i thought they took sos out the bcs

10/15/2006 4:45:08 PM

yeah, but they're going to beat up on each other and the losers will drop.

10/15/2006 4:45:40 PM

Quote :

"Screw NC State being ranked."

some nice optimism there. look at the schedule ahead. aside from GT and Clemson, we should breeze through.

10/15/2006 4:46:41 PM

the three biggest suprises to me are:

1. Auburn being that high
2. Cal being ahead of Tenn (bullshit)
3. Tulsa hahahaha

10/15/2006 4:46:56 PM

Yes they are but if one team wins out then I'm saying they'd jump the 1 loss teams..

About SOS. It's not a main component but it's in every computer ranking, which is a main component.

Quote :

"some nice optimism there. look at the schedule ahead. aside from GT and Clemson, we should breeze through."

Of course. Except for the fact that WE CAN'T BEAT THE SHITTY TEAMS THAT WE ARE SUPPOSED TO BEAT JUST LIKE EVERY OTHER GODDAMN YEAR.

[Edited on October 15, 2006 at 4:47 PM. Reason : x]

10/15/2006 4:47:10 PM

So this year, one non-BCS team has to get in as long as they are top 12, right?

10/15/2006 4:48:25 PM

right now the national championship game will include the winners of these 3 games if they all win out until then:

Ohio State/Michigan
Louisville/WV
USC/ND

10/15/2006 4:49:37 PM

I'm not being pessimistic. I just don't care that much about our ranking. I'd rather us make it through each game and fly under the radar.

[Edited on October 15, 2006 at 4:50 PM. Reason : ]

10/15/2006 4:50:31 PM

^^ If Auburn wins out, gets into the SEC Championship and beat Florida again (or Tenn), they would get in before ND even if they beat USC

10/15/2006 4:57:25 PM

^ But USC destroyed Arkansas at Arkansas and Arkansas beat Auburn at Arkansas. So if Notre Dame beat USC at USC, by the law of progression Notre Dame would be a better team than Auburn.

Now, Michigan...

10/15/2006 5:04:03 PM

but what about tennessee?...and clemson

[Edited on October 15, 2006 at 5:05 PM. Reason : still alive]

10/15/2006 5:04:57 PM

NyM410 is a reeeal big supporter of pack ball.

10/15/2006 5:05:50 PM

^^^ but only fools believe in shit like that

[Edited on October 15, 2006 at 5:06 PM. Reason : d]

10/15/2006 5:05:57 PM

we need a tournament

then we'll see who the real teams are

there is no other way

every other method is subjective bullshit that produces fake championships

10/15/2006 5:06:58 PM

^^^ you're god damn right I am. I'm just not a cheerleader and won't buy into false hype. Come game time I'll be there cheering for the Pack to win as much as anyone else..

[Edited on October 15, 2006 at 5:07 PM. Reason : k]

10/15/2006 5:07:37 PM

^^^ So you're saying that if A beats B and B beats C, than A is not a better team than C.

Question then, since good college football teams try not to play each other, you think subjectiveness is the only way to determine the better team then? What do you think this is, boxing?

Besides, look at this order for a second in regards to Notre Dame.

1 Ohio State
2 USC
3 Michigan
4 Auburn
5 West Virginia
6 Florida
7 Louisville
8 Notre Dame

Assume they run the table. That means they will go by #2 since they beat them.
#5 and #7 play each other and Notre Dame would pass one of them.
#4 and #6 would meet in the SEC championship game if they both won every remaining game.
#1 and #3 are playing the last weekend of the year. Not sure what voters would do if ND was high up and Michigan has one loss, but poll voters are all about what have you done for me lately.

So by that alone they're up to 4th, and that's assuming the other 3 teams don't lose another game along the way.

[Edited on October 15, 2006 at 5:14 PM. Reason : /]

10/15/2006 5:07:56 PM

you can use the A beat B, B beat C etc argument to find some retarded shit. Lets see, State beat BC who beat clemson... but akron beat state, but then akron lost to central mich... therefore Central Michigan is better than clemson.



and what do you mean good teams dont play each other?

10/15/2006 5:11:15 PM

Jaybee1200 are you for us or against us?

10/15/2006 5:12:04 PM

for of course... but what does that have to do with anything in this thread?

10/15/2006 5:13:25 PM

the A beat B beat C bullshit is for the computers...and communists

games are played on the fucking field, so that kind of logic is fucking moot

i swear we need some fucking brackets at the end of the season

10/15/2006 5:14:46 PM

please forgive the broken record...

but can you imagine the fucking AWESOME matchups we'd see in a bracketted tourney?

10/15/2006 5:15:45 PM

Quote :

"communists"

?!?

10/15/2006 5:15:52 PM

Quote :

"the A beat B beat C bullshit is for the computers...and communists games are played on the fucking field, so that kind of logic is fucking moot i swear we need some fucking brackets at the end of the season"

I agree we need brackets. But until we get some how else are you going to separate 11-1 teams at the end of the season that never played each other? You're complaining about computers and the only other way to do it is strength of schedule.

10/15/2006 5:17:21 PM

Look, if Auburn runs the table from here on out and ND beats USC, they will be ahead of USC and ND if all three of them have one loss each... book it.


11-1 in the SEC > 11-1 in any other conference

[Edited on October 15, 2006 at 5:18 PM. Reason : d]

10/15/2006 5:18:08 PM

the abc thing only works one time. team a beat team b who beat team c so team a is better than team c. it doenst work if you put a 4th team into it or team c has a better record than team c. team a and c must have the same record

10/15/2006 5:18:41 PM

Quote :

"Look, if Auburn runs the table from here on out and ND beats USC, they will be ahead of USC and ND if all three of them have one loss each... book it."

If Auburn is better than USC, then explain this:

USC 50, @ Arkansas 14
Arkansas 27, @ Auburn 10

The end of this from me can be summed up like this: For the love of God you stupid whores that run college football, get off your knees and setup a playoff!

10/15/2006 5:20:55 PM

yes, until we get brackets, and even when we do get brackets, we'll need R2D2 to tell us what teams' relative rankings are. but i'll be damned if the current way of doing things is producing an objective #1.


[Edited on October 15, 2006 at 5:26 PM. Reason : spellingisms]

10/15/2006 5:22:15 PM

^^ ok, you getting borderline ignorant...


as I stated above, A beat B beat C etc is bullshit, e.g C.Michigan is better than Clemson????


there are TONS of factors that could explain how arkansas got killed by USC but then beat Auburn aside from "USC is better than Auburn".

10/15/2006 5:24:40 PM

there is no abc combination that puts cmichigan with clemson. that is like abcde

it only works for abc and if one of the teams has a better record you wouldnt even need to use it. this is only for teams that have the same # of losses.

10/15/2006 5:27:02 PM

oh, is that the official rule? I didnt see that on the BCS website, my fault.

10/15/2006 5:28:16 PM

http://www.tellshowbcs.com/FAQ.html

10/15/2006 5:29:20 PM

riiiight

10/15/2006 5:31:50 PM