Flyin Ryan All American 8224 Posts user info edit post |
Completely unscientific straw poll. Feel free to describe your answer and try and keep from attacking others. 11/2/2006 3:48:43 PM |
Mr. Joshua Swimfanfan 43948 Posts user info edit post |
you fuckin retard 11/2/2006 3:49:08 PM |
Flyin Ryan All American 8224 Posts user info edit post |
Quote : | "Interests : I'm currently being grossly overpaid. " |
11/2/2006 3:55:53 PM |
TGD All American 8912 Posts user info edit post |
yes 11/2/2006 3:58:24 PM |
sarijoul All American 14208 Posts user info edit post |
electoral college and the way that primaries works seem a little silly.
but it's really not THAT big of a deal.
it just makes candidates focus on spots that they wouldn't focus on otherwise. 11/2/2006 5:15:10 PM |
Crazywade All American 4918 Posts user info edit post |
hey atleast we're not Sierre Leon....
them fuckers are insane down there
[Edited on November 2, 2006 at 5:16 PM. Reason : .] 11/2/2006 5:15:53 PM |
Flyin Ryan All American 8224 Posts user info edit post |
Quote : | "electoral college and the way that primaries works seem a little silly." |
I was kinda meaning the political system as in the elections in general, how each party operates and run for office, and are you happy with the state of the system overall.
Or at least that was the intent. 11/2/2006 5:37:44 PM |
McDanger All American 18835 Posts user info edit post |
No I'm not. Practically no reasonable people get representation in either party. 11/2/2006 5:39:26 PM |
markgoal All American 15996 Posts user info edit post |
I hate the current presidential primary system. It creates less moderate nominees, and overrepresents unrepresentative places. We should either return to the old school caucus and convention system (very unlikely), or have a national primary day. 11/2/2006 5:43:54 PM |
PinkandBlack Suspended 10517 Posts user info edit post |
In a word, no. 11/2/2006 5:47:17 PM |
moron All American 34142 Posts user info edit post |
I'm neutral towards our electoral system. It could be better, but it's not terrible.
Our political system though encourages apathy and idiocy by creating too much polarization which can be off-putting and confusing. 11/2/2006 5:57:00 PM |
Wolfpack2K All American 7059 Posts user info edit post |
Yes. Though I think that if the Party of John Kerry takes control in the midterm elections (extremely unlikely), I would support a military coup. Just have the military seize Washington, dissolve Congress and the Courts, and set up a plenipotentiary council to run the government. 11/2/2006 6:24:09 PM |
LoneSnark All American 12317 Posts user info edit post |
^ There are some that theorize that could never happen in an anglo saxon society. The Mexican Foreign Minister that was giving the interview called it "the anglo saxon tradition of compromise."
He was trying to explain why the American Presidential system seems to work for Americans but leads every 3rd world country that has tried it towards either a military coup or a general governmental collapse. I don't know that I buy it entirely, but I think there could be some truth there.
[Edited on November 2, 2006 at 6:47 PM. Reason : .,.] 11/2/2006 6:44:46 PM |
quagmire02 All American 44225 Posts user info edit post |
in this day and age, the electoral system, without a doubt, is the dumbest, most useless aspect of our political system
WITHOUT A DOUBT...other than the voters, i mean 11/2/2006 8:53:04 PM |
Prawn Star All American 7643 Posts user info edit post |
That makes no sense.
Go back to chit chat 11/2/2006 8:58:04 PM |
jlphipps All American 2083 Posts user info edit post |
no. 11/2/2006 9:02:43 PM |
PinkandBlack Suspended 10517 Posts user info edit post |
Quote : | "Yes. Though I think that if the Party of John Kerry takes control in the midterm elections (extremely unlikely), I would support a military coup. Just have the military seize Washington, dissolve Congress and the Courts, and set up a plenipotentiary council to run the government." |
I would welcome a military coup. Most of the military generals are upset with this administration, too. They are doers, and make better leaders than bureacrats, lawyers, and unsuccessful businessmen.11/2/2006 9:12:43 PM |
Flyin Ryan All American 8224 Posts user info edit post |
Decent Newsweek article, although he gives Gore too much credit.
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/15530569/site/newsweek/
[Edited on November 3, 2006 at 10:23 AM. Reason : /] 11/3/2006 10:21:03 AM |
AxlBonBach All American 45550 Posts user info edit post |
yes, as long as the side i vote for keeps winning 11/3/2006 10:25:48 AM |
markgoal All American 15996 Posts user info edit post |
There is still one compelling reason to keep the electoral college: States run elections, and the Electoral College serves as a buffer that limits the effects of any illegitimacy in an election to that particular State...in effect quarantining it from the overall pool of votes. Considering how imperfect our electoral system is, I think keeping some sort of buffer is wise. Garbage in --> Garbage Out 11/3/2006 11:28:32 AM |
SkiSalomon All American 4264 Posts user info edit post |
compared to the electoral systems of every country that i have been sent to to observe, yes. does our system have its weaknesses, absolutely. 11/3/2006 11:29:27 AM |
Cherokee All American 8264 Posts user info edit post |
i'm pretty happy with it 11/3/2006 11:30:31 AM |
Shaggy All American 17820 Posts user info edit post |
The system works, the people dont. 11/3/2006 12:11:48 PM |
Grapehead All American 19676 Posts user info edit post |
no 11/3/2006 12:20:53 PM |
LoneSnark All American 12317 Posts user info edit post |
^^ according to the statistics the American people work more than any other industrialized people. 11/3/2006 1:10:34 PM |
Shaggy All American 17820 Posts user info edit post |
I meant that any flaws in our leadership are purely the result of the choices of the people, not the system. 11/3/2006 1:23:27 PM |