Totally stoked for this one too...

The Hills Have Eyes II (2007)



http://imdb.com/title/tt0800069/

3/7/2007 12:28:16 AM

It's clear that you're an idiot.

3/7/2007 12:34:49 AM

that remake was awful. I walked out on that shit.

3/7/2007 12:35:57 AM

first one was entertaining.

and strengthened by the hilarious huge audience "AHH" setting.

3/7/2007 12:47:09 AM

I admit the first 1/3 I watched the trailer I thought "this doensn't look bad" but when the mutants were like 400000 times more mutant and insane than the first remake I lost interest. 1/10.

3/7/2007 12:59:48 AM

the first one was quite possibly the worst movie i've ever seen

so i probably wont be seeing the second one

3/7/2007 1:09:01 AM

The first one was outrageously terrible, but that doesn't mean it wasn't entertaining. Regardless, I still can't wait for this one.

3/7/2007 1:10:51 AM

exactly. I enjoy bad but funnily bad movies, like this and the omen remake. at the latter, the audience was so loud with laughter and yells, one guy in his twenties went and got the fucking theater people who got cops to come stare into the crowd for about a minute.

3/7/2007 1:13:28 AM

The first one wasn't so bad it doesn't deserve a sequel

I liked a good bit of it, and some of the action scenes. A lot of people cry about bad horror films (me included), but this is a bit better than the rest of the garbage being pushed out. So, yes it's the lesser of two evils.

3/7/2007 1:26:20 AM

I will say it was in the upper tier of the horror movies of 2006, in a year of what... Pulse, Stay Alive, the Omen, etc?

although the descent was considerably better.

[Edited on March 7, 2007 at 1:29 AM. Reason : fhd]

3/7/2007 1:28:21 AM

As far as remakes are concerned I thought it was very well done, better than the original I thought. Mission accomplished. Does not deserve a sequel however.

3/7/2007 9:06:29 AM

Quote :

"The first one wasn't so bad it doesn't deserve a sequel "

3/7/2007 9:07:46 AM

first one was decent for a horror flick, that said it's on the bottom end of average overall.... this second one looks to be a more cliche-ish horror movie... which is far worse...

3/7/2007 3:25:18 PM

anybody who liked the remake is not my TWW friend anymore

3/7/2007 3:28:24 PM

Jessica Stroup was in my HS class.

3/7/2007 3:37:51 PM

clearly, you have lost your mind

3/7/2007 6:30:15 PM

the first one wasnt very good

3/7/2007 6:44:25 PM

where's the thread for "Dead Silence"?????

http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0455760/

the fact that the writer of the saw movies wrote this makes me sad.

[Edited on March 7, 2007 at 7:04 PM. Reason : oh god its the same director from saw as well..... ]

3/7/2007 7:02:26 PM

^ my thoughts when i saw the credits at the end of the theater preview

3/7/2007 7:36:15 PM

Quote :

"As far as remakes are concerned I thought it was very well done, better than the original I thought. Mission accomplished. Does not deserve a sequel however."

Agreed. The original sucked ass. Wes Craven has always been a shitty filmmaker.

3/7/2007 8:40:26 PM

The original (remake) was pretty terrible, but I admit I thought it was funny/awesome when the pussy/hippie/nerdy dude flipped out and started killing the mutants.

3/7/2007 11:41:52 PM

i never saw the original

is that why i think the remake wasnt that bad

or are everyone on tdub pretentious dicks

3/8/2007 12:11:07 AM

Quote :

"are everyone on tdub pretentious dicks"

I hate snobs, this remake was damn entertaining... alomost as entertaining as these dudes...

http://myspace.com/monotonix

israelis who play drums of fire...

3/8/2007 1:42:48 AM

Quote :

"i never saw the original is that why i think the remake wasnt that bad or are everyone on tdub pretentious dicks"

3/8/2007 11:43:46 AM

i'm in the same boat...didn't see the original but i liked the remake a lot

this one, on the other hand, looks a little shitty

3/12/2007 5:53:52 PM

What, no The Hills Still Have Eyes ?

3/12/2007 7:00:35 PM

The Hills have Ears

3/12/2007 7:11:50 PM

the hills have genitals

3/12/2007 7:19:58 PM