Anyone bought one of these? They seem like a good deal, but only getting a 90 day warranty with one makes me wary. I mean if they're only willing to stand behind a product for 90 days, even thought its supposed to be "as good as new", I wonder if I'll hit 120 days and end up with a paperweight. At the same time though, if anything was going to go wrong wouldn't it happen within 90 days? Do you think its worth the $100-$150 i could save on a $700 lcd?

6/25/2007 1:35:05 PM

anyone? i'm leaning towards just spending the money for new, even if only for the peace of mind

6/25/2007 10:28:00 PM

Just spend for new.

You are much less likely to be fucked thanks to the longer warranty.

[Edited on June 25, 2007 at 10:38 PM. Reason : I'm in the market myself. Forget it. Spend $150 and get peace of mind. That's what i'm gonna do.]

6/25/2007 10:35:29 PM

ive heard nothing but negatives on recertified tv's. i wouldnt risk it.

6/25/2007 10:56:06 PM

i wouldnt do it, but im weird like that

6/25/2007 11:00:04 PM

You're better off buying tv's with cosmetic damage than recertified tv's. The discount is larger and you pretty much know what's was wrong with it when you get it. A Cracked speaker panel can get you 70% off and sometimes you can get them with the full original warranty.

6/27/2007 6:12:54 PM

yeah, i wouldnt want to get a 700$ LCD TV that was refurbished with only a 90 day warranty. these things are too finicky. anything can go wrong with them. its not like a computer where you crack it open and swap boards out.

6/28/2007 3:29:15 AM

i'm about to spend 1300 on a new lcd tv.....god help me

6/28/2007 5:24:59 PM