Hondo Veteran 470 Posts user info edit post |
Guy is pretty smart.
http://dabble.com/node/12427667 7/10/2007 10:12:18 AM |
OmarBadu zidik 25071 Posts user info edit post |
what a horrible thread name
really cool innovation though - hopefully it actually goes somewhere 7/10/2007 10:21:27 AM |
Hondo Veteran 470 Posts user info edit post |
Had success in getting you to not only view the video but respond so I would say good thread title. 7/10/2007 10:27:20 AM |
Boone All American 5237 Posts user info edit post |
Does the whole setup result in a net energy gain? 7/10/2007 10:28:11 AM |
agentlion All American 13936 Posts user info edit post |
i hate local reporters..... he should have just let Science or Nature or an engineering journal summarize the invention. The reporter missed a gigantic feature of the invention when he was talking about the Sterling Engine and he said it was using "nothing but salt water" as a fuel. you mean, "nothing but salt water, and radio waves", which of course take electricity to generate, which should then lead to Boone's question, which would then give us some actual information. Not a false hope that we could just start burning salt water to create heat and electricity with no additional energy input. 7/10/2007 10:59:55 AM |
Hondo Veteran 470 Posts user info edit post |
^ I agree with that 100% 7/10/2007 11:09:19 AM |
Prawn Star All American 7643 Posts user info edit post |
The concept of hydrolysis via radio waves is interesting, but I can't imagine that the efficiency is very good. Of course the first law of thermodynamics dictates that you are not gonna get any more energy out of this system than you put in. Unless this technique of breaking down water molecules is ultra-efficient, I don't see too much promise in this science-fair show. 7/10/2007 11:32:57 AM |
ussjbroli All American 4518 Posts user info edit post |
this is at least the third thread on this, and as has already been discussed, he's probably losing a shit ton of energy doing this 7/10/2007 11:35:26 AM |
LoneSnark All American 12317 Posts user info edit post |
Well, the production of Hydrogen with existing techniques is attrotious. If his process is even 70% efficient then this is a major breakthrough.
7/10/2007 12:07:54 PM |
Noen All American 31346 Posts user info edit post |
its not efficient at all 7/10/2007 1:28:59 PM |
benz240 All American 4476 Posts user info edit post |
so is it the H2 that's burning or the Na? and if i remember correctly it took a shit ton of energy to break H2O into elemental H and Na, so he must be supplying a lot of RF energy to get that measly flame 7/10/2007 2:02:41 PM |
Solinari All American 16957 Posts user info edit post |
yep, that was the first thing I thought of, how much freakin RF power is this guy beaming into that salt water? 7/10/2007 6:48:06 PM |
lafta All American 14880 Posts user info edit post |
this sounds like wireless power to me, you beam some wifi radio to something that sparks a chemical reaction
also this actually raises a very important health issue what if you have your radio at the beach and you turn it twards the ocean you may spark the biggest fire the world ever seen. 7/10/2007 7:26:53 PM |
umbrellaman All American 10892 Posts user info edit post |
The energy efficiency is the very first thing that I thought about, but another thing I'd like to know is what sort of waste products are produced from this reaction. I can't imagine that there's too many environmental toxins you can produce using salt and H2O, but this reaction is definitely going to produce something. If it puts out some kind of greenhouse gas, then this invention hasn't really fixed anything.
Not that this thing is immediately discredited, but there are two things that make me suspicious. A) This guy is just a "broadcast engineer," so while it's not impossible I just don't see somebody with this background being able to come up with something like this and then being able to conduct the proper experiments to back up his claims with hard data. B) As far as the news report showed, he took it to a guy whose background is polymer engineering. That means he at least has a good working knowledge of chemistry and probably thermodynamics, but I don't know that somebody who works with polymers would necessarily have the right equipment to properly check out something like this. It might be better to get somebody with a chemical engineering background or something. Plus, the guy in the news report only said that the temperature of the flame was impressive; we never heard him say anything about the intensity of the radio waves that had to be put in, and how that compares to the energy that can be extracted from the flame. 7/10/2007 10:32:30 PM |
Solinari All American 16957 Posts user info edit post |
get your head out of your ass
if this thing was real and polluted just as much as fossil fuels, it would solve an ass load of problems 7/10/2007 10:52:09 PM |