It's working to better drunknloaded our lives. http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/21271545/wid/11915829?GT1=10450[Edited on October 13, 2007 at 8:18 PM. Reason : .]
10/13/2007 8:17:54 PM
"butter"
10/13/2007 8:18:19 PM
"tortoise"
10/13/2007 8:19:17 PM
"stairs"
10/13/2007 8:19:44 PM
global warming
10/13/2007 8:21:43 PM
I just noticed this part
10/13/2007 8:24:31 PM
it has a certain logic to it
10/13/2007 8:25:09 PM
don't give pedophiles paper and pencilsthey might draw out they're deviant sexual fantasieswhat retarded nonsense[Edited on October 13, 2007 at 8:28 PM. Reason : .]
10/13/2007 8:28:50 PM
10/13/2007 8:40:16 PM
10/13/2007 8:45:58 PM
uhhwhat do you mean "needs to"?they make robots for sex, it'll happen
10/13/2007 9:05:04 PM
If we are willing to let men marry men and women marry women, then the next logical step would be to let man marry robot. Some people have already visted the animal kingdom. Why not go one step further and explore our sexual desires with plants? Guess there is something to be desired from inanimate objects.This is not anything surprising. Just the great powers of science at work.
10/13/2007 11:31:33 PM
10/13/2007 11:37:41 PM
marrying robots is an absurd idea. Having one as a sex toy, cool, but marrying someone who isn't real...
10/13/2007 11:40:48 PM
10/13/2007 11:41:20 PM
let's just see how absurd it is in about 500 years
10/13/2007 11:41:31 PM
10/13/2007 11:46:26 PM
an object?I don't know the story about either of those guys. Who/what did they marry?
10/13/2007 11:56:45 PM
Pam Anderson.you slow puppy
10/13/2007 11:58:29 PM
oh, of course. but she isn't a robot.
10/14/2007 12:03:32 AM
you forgot, "tee hee" at the end of that sentence
10/14/2007 12:04:22 AM
The first thing I'll do is get myself a Lu-bot.
10/14/2007 12:06:14 AM
of course, she isn't a robot. tee hee.
10/14/2007 12:06:25 AM
don't date robotsseriously
10/14/2007 12:08:02 AM
10/14/2007 12:12:16 AM