instead of m/s(meters per second) we would have the meterhertz

11/4/2007 6:10:06 PM

wat

11/4/2007 6:10:36 PM

i am lost
MORE LIKE THE PETERHERTZ

[Edited on November 4, 2007 at 6:10 PM. Reason : s]

11/4/2007 6:10:40 PM

no

definitely it should be meter-becquerel

11/4/2007 6:11:15 PM

but meterhertz rolls off the tounge better

11/4/2007 6:14:29 PM

^^^^should have posted

meters/first

[Edited on November 4, 2007 at 6:14 PM. Reason : ]

11/4/2007 6:14:32 PM

we should use the dick unit more

11/4/2007 6:23:32 PM

megametergigahertz instead of mm/s

11/4/2007 6:36:51 PM

so how many posthertz triggers flood control?

11/4/2007 6:37:16 PM

Quote :

" definitely it should be meter-becquerel"

11/4/2007 6:40:50 PM

do away with english units first and i am on board with this idea.

11/4/2007 7:25:55 PM

Quote :

"we should use the dick unit more"

11/4/2007 7:38:05 PM

the only reasonable solution to this is... m/st


meters per second time

11/4/2007 7:48:03 PM

I'm sticking to M.P.H. thank you very much.

If we were supposed to use the metric system, Jesus would have had 10 disciples.

11/4/2007 7:51:12 PM

who's jesus?

11/4/2007 7:57:58 PM

deciples

11/4/2007 7:59:08 PM

omg 7.8 jiggawatz

11/4/2007 8:03:58 PM

jigga who?

11/4/2007 8:05:16 PM

no

definitely it should be meter-becquerel

11/4/2007 8:18:46 PM

^third

11/4/2007 8:26:54 PM

i totally LOL'ed when i read that

11/4/2007 8:34:45 PM

watts per newton?

11/4/2007 8:37:37 PM

just don't worry about the metric crap

11/4/2007 9:30:46 PM

Meter*Ampere/Coulomb

11/4/2007 9:47:12 PM

no unit is truly cool unless you have to multiply it by 778 to use as energy and 1 to use as weight.

11/4/2007 10:00:18 PM

why should it be meter-becquerel


meterhertz means the same thing and is much easier to say


and yes, mr. parsons, i believe you are on to something here

[Edited on November 4, 2007 at 10:47 PM. Reason : fucking nukes]

11/4/2007 10:47:12 PM

how would you say m/s² ?

[Edited on November 4, 2007 at 10:49 PM. Reason : meterhertz/s ?]

[Edited on November 4, 2007 at 10:50 PM. Reason : meterhertzhertz]

11/4/2007 10:49:09 PM

^meters per second squared...

or "m s two" if I was in a hurrry

11/4/2007 10:51:16 PM

Quote :

"omg 7.8 jiggawatz"

1.21 gigawats

11/4/2007 10:55:04 PM

Quote :

"no definitely it should be meter-becquerel"

11/4/2007 10:58:59 PM

Quote :

"how would you say m/s² ?"

meterhizzertz

11/4/2007 11:07:37 PM