FykalJpn All American 17209 Posts user info edit post |
i read a while back about a murder-for-hire scheme wherein the contractor would create a website to take bets as to the time of the victim's death and offer a payoff to the person whose guess was the closest--the idea being that if the payoff were high enough, then someone would step forward to do the killing and presumably that person would know the victim's time of death most accurately. any thoughts on the feasibility of such a scheme?
note: i'm not planning to kill anyone, nor do i endorse such a plan 11/29/2007 6:10:55 PM |
fjjackso All American 14538 Posts user info edit post |
6:11:57pm
v do you?] 11/29/2007 6:11:57 PM |
simonn best gottfriend 28968 Posts user info edit post |
i would find it hard to imagine that it could get the attention necessary for this to work w/o leading to getting caught.
^ i see what you did there.
^ yar.] 11/29/2007 6:12:22 PM |
Str8BacardiL ************ 41752 Posts user info edit post |
ILL BURN DOWN YOUR FUCKING TRAILER 11/29/2007 6:12:33 PM |
LimpyNuts All American 16859 Posts user info edit post |
1. a website would not work as it would get shutdown when people started using it 2. a similar scheme involving desperate people and large quantities of money might work. 11/29/2007 6:13:13 PM |
FykalJpn All American 17209 Posts user info edit post |
^^^who getting caught?
the idea is that the person contracting the killing would not be culpable, regardless of whether the perpetrator is caught
[Edited on November 29, 2007 at 6:15 PM. Reason : ^yeah, it doesn't have to be a website per se] 11/29/2007 6:14:09 PM |
fjjackso All American 14538 Posts user info edit post |
i am sure that in some way they would be liable 11/29/2007 6:14:56 PM |
pwrstrkdf250 Suspended 60006 Posts user info edit post |
11/29/2007 6:16:29 PM |
FykalJpn All American 17209 Posts user info edit post |
sure, the person would be responsible, but what crime could you prove? 11/29/2007 6:16:51 PM |
simonn best gottfriend 28968 Posts user info edit post |
i'm really not sure a loophole like this would prevent you from being responsible, as clever as it may be. 11/29/2007 6:18:02 PM |
FykalJpn All American 17209 Posts user info edit post |
another legal conundrum: suppose i'm trying to seduce a 12-year-old girl on the internet--but, the person i think is a 12-year-old girl turns out to be a 35-year-old sheriff's deputy. i'm charged with soliciting a child for immoral purposes or something similar, but in fact i never solicited a child for anything... 11/29/2007 6:28:00 PM |
Cherokee All American 8264 Posts user info edit post |
^i think that's part of the reason a lot of people got off on to catch a predator, because they actually committed no crime 11/29/2007 6:29:44 PM |