danmangt40 All American 2349 Posts user info edit post |
I'd do it myself, but I just know you want to. 2/7/2008 1:15:49 AM |
optmusprimer All American 30318 Posts user info edit post |
no thread left behind!
[Edited on February 9, 2008 at 10:06 AM. Reason : dickhead] 2/8/2008 10:04:40 PM |
0EPII1 All American 42541 Posts user info edit post |
Pics coming later today! Anything for you danmangt40 (and my other fans!) [no homo]
So you want pics of the Chicago unveiling, or Dodge's official shots of the car in the wild? Also, 800 pixels wide, 1024 wide, or 1280 wide?
BTW, y'all know the first one sold for $400,000 a couple of weeks back, right? http://www.worldcarfans.com/9080123.001/2008-dodge-challenger-srt8-job-1-sells-for-400,000
Till I come back a few hours later, I leave you with this:
A video: http://www.worldcarfans.com/4080206.002/2008-dodge-challenger-srt8
And:
2/9/2008 8:07:00 AM |
jsmcconn All American 1220 Posts user info edit post |
why even ask, you know ur posting it at 1280pixles no matter what and it'll be side-scroll city around here 2/9/2008 8:10:15 AM |
0EPII1 All American 42541 Posts user info edit post |
1) If that's what I am doing, why is the picture above only 800 wide? 2) I asked, didn't I? Did that question of mine in my post above read like a joke? 3) Show me any 1280 wide picture I have posted in the past few several months.
Also, 800 pixels wide, 1024 wide, or 1280 wide? 2/9/2008 8:21:10 AM |
sumfoo1 soup du hier 41043 Posts user info edit post |
don't hate on him cause yall have shitty ass monitors set at low ass resolutions. get a 24" and you won't need to side scroll for shit. 2/9/2008 8:43:35 AM |
0EPII1 All American 42541 Posts user info edit post |
I think I will go with 1024 wide... that's a happy medium I guess. Back in 5-6 hours. 2/9/2008 8:50:14 AM |
Seotaji All American 34244 Posts user info edit post |
i like the looks of the challenger. 2/9/2008 10:37:37 AM |
danmangt40 All American 2349 Posts user info edit post |
http://www.automobilemag.com/multimedia/photo_gallery/0801_2008_dodge_challenger_srt8_wallpaper/index.html
I don't think I've ever lusted so hard for such a heavy car with such an underwhelming interior...
[Edited on February 9, 2008 at 12:25 PM. Reason : .] 2/9/2008 12:24:26 PM |
1in10^9 All American 7451 Posts user info edit post |
Challenger is indeed one of the best looking cars out there today. Would rock one without a doubt. 2/9/2008 12:37:09 PM |
Golovko All American 27023 Posts user info edit post |
a lot of rednecks in this thread
and i like how dodge knows its demographic. They labeled the fuel door ("fuel") lol. 2/9/2008 1:01:44 PM |
danmangt40 All American 2349 Posts user info edit post |
2/9/2008 5:53:19 PM |
ScHpEnXeL Suspended 32613 Posts user info edit post |
good lookin car 2/9/2008 5:56:03 PM |
0EPII1 All American 42541 Posts user info edit post |
2/9/2008 6:42:19 PM |
0EPII1 All American 42541 Posts user info edit post |
Most comprehensive galleries:
http://www.autoblog.com/photos/2008-dodge-challenger-srt8-4/ and http://www.autoblog.com/photos/chicago-2008-2008-dodge-challenger-srt8-live-reveal/ and http://www.worldcarfans.com/3080207.001/page1/2008-dodge-challenger
The best pics:
2/9/2008 9:48:09 PM |
0EPII1 All American 42541 Posts user info edit post |
2/9/2008 9:50:17 PM |
0EPII1 All American 42541 Posts user info edit post |
[Edited on February 9, 2008 at 9:54 PM. Reason : ]
2/9/2008 9:52:33 PM |
0EPII1 All American 42541 Posts user info edit post |
2/9/2008 9:54:09 PM |
0EPII1 All American 42541 Posts user info edit post |
2/9/2008 9:57:22 PM |
0EPII1 All American 42541 Posts user info edit post |
This is what the manual gear would look like... sweet!
http://www.leftlanenews.com/wp-content/plugins/iimage-gallery.php?idpost=6425 2/10/2008 12:58:28 AM |
arghx Deucefest '04 7584 Posts user info edit post |
exterior looks sick, BUT what kind of 400+hp car barely breaks 13's ? 2/10/2008 3:06:53 AM |
gk2004 All American 6237 Posts user info edit post |
It would look sick as a convertable 2/10/2008 10:20:12 AM |
Quinn All American 16417 Posts user info edit post |
maybe I am missing something but that car is hideous
the only reason the old ones are cool, are because they are old
what a bunch of wasted space 2/10/2008 11:15:13 AM |
KeithW62 Starting Lineup 83 Posts user info edit post |
sweet. 2/10/2008 11:24:07 AM |
Quinn All American 16417 Posts user info edit post |
Quote : | "he new Dodge Challenger SRT8 is powered by a 425 hp (420 lb-ft torque) 6.1 liter HEMI V8 engine and is capable of low 5 second 0-60 mph times and a quarter-mile in under 14 seconds." |
Youre kidding me.
14 seconds, with that many foot lbs?
How can they afford to keep engineering these shitty cars?2/10/2008 11:33:28 AM |
stowaway All American 11770 Posts user info edit post |
it's a 4.9 and ~13.3 according to dodge.
stock SRT8 cars have been able to get into the high 12s with the right conditions. The 09 with the 6 speed should knock a good bit of time off as well. 2/10/2008 11:48:58 AM |
Seotaji All American 34244 Posts user info edit post |
that is a shitty interior. 2/10/2008 4:31:24 PM |
Aficionado Suspended 22518 Posts user info edit post |
i love how the basic dodge radio hasnt changed in 20 years
my fucking 89 dodge spirit had that obnoxious green display with the buttons surrounding it 2/10/2008 5:33:16 PM |
cheerwhiner All American 8302 Posts user info edit post |
look. its a DODGE. perormance, handling, interior are nothing. Just exterior looks are all that matters. durr
"Butterperformance" 2/10/2008 6:14:03 PM |
danmangt40 All American 2349 Posts user info edit post |
^^I'm sure you'll be able to get MyGig
^durr is right. I disagree with all of that except MAYBE the interior. I see a lot of shitty interiors going around these days. Apart from Mazda, Mini, Audi, BMW, Acura, and Maybe Honda.... most car interiors are the pits today unless you're spending big bucks. At the very least, this interior looks to be "par" with other LXs. I'm sure that to prove your point you'd whip out some numbers for Evo, Sti, etc. Please. Appealing as this car is, it's a niche vehicle on a MUCH larger and expensive platform. They didn't have the ideal platform to start with and this ought to be considered merely a sexier LX. And at that, I'd say it has the market all to itself in the low-to-mid 30s. The srt8 this year is just window dressing. The meat of the challenger sales are going to be R/Ts with manuals next year.
Quinn... As for the 14 second 1/4 mi, I'm pretty sure these are very conservative numbers. But not looking good? c'mon now. Beauty may be in the eye of the beholder, but you are apparently looking from a place where nobody else is standing. This is just.... badass. 2/11/2008 8:38:55 AM |
tchenku midshipman 18586 Posts user info edit post |
it looks porky in the mid-section (needs more ground clearance there) 2/11/2008 9:02:11 AM |
sparky Garage Mod 12301 Posts user info edit post |
i like the camaro better 2/11/2008 10:59:19 AM |
richthofen All American 15758 Posts user info edit post |
Sign me up...I wish. Monthly payments with nothing down would be insane, not going to pay $700/mo for 5 years for a car loan. In a few years though! In a few years...
WTF straight dashboard though. Reminds me of the dash in my Marauder, which debuted in the '97 Crown Vic. The SRT seats should be nice if they're anything like the ones in the SRT-8 300C, but that dash is both bland and ugly. Individually hooded gauges are nice but the rest rather sucks. They should hire the design team that did the new Malibu's interior...
Does anyone else find it ironic that it *wasn't* OEPII1 who made it a side-scroller for once?
[Edited on February 11, 2008 at 12:49 PM. Reason : C'mon, not everyone is running 1600 wide...] 2/11/2008 12:46:44 PM |
shmorri2 All American 10003 Posts user info edit post |
GENERAL INFORMATION Body Style.............................Coupe Assembly Plant.........................Brampton, Ontario, Canada EPA Vehicle Class......................Intermediate car Introduction Date......................April 2008
ENGINE: 6.1-LITER HEMI® V8 Type and Description...................90-degree V-type, liquid-cooled Displacement...........................370 cu. in. (6059 cu. cm) Bore x Stroke..........................4.06 x 3.58 (103.0 x 90.9) Valve System...........................Pushrod-operated overhead valves, 16 valves, .......................................conventional hydraulic lifters, all with roller followers Fuel Injection.........................Sequential, multi-port, electronic, returnless Construction...........................Deep-skirt cast-iron block with cross-bolted main bearing caps .......................................aluminum alloy heads with hemispherical combustion chambers Compression Ratio......................10.3:1 Power (estimated SAE Net)..............425 bhp @ 6200 rpm, (69.8 bhp/L) Torque (estimated SAE Net).............420 lb.-ft. (310 N•m) @ 4800 rpm Max. Engine Speed......................6400 rpm (electronically limited) Fuel Requirement.......................Unleaded premium 91 octane (R+M)/2 recommended Oil Capacity...........................7 qt. (6.6 L) Coolant Capacity.......................14 qt. (13.25 L) Emission Controls .....................Dual close-coupled 3-way catalytic converters, quad heated oxygen .......................................sensors and internal engine features Max. Gross Trailer Weight..............Not recommended Estimated EPA Fuel Economy, mpg........13/18
TRANSMISSION: AUTOMATIC, 5-SPEED OVERDRIVE (W5A580) Description............................Adaptive electronic control or AutoStick® driver interactive manual .......................................control and electronically modulated torque converter clutch Gear Ratios 1st....................................3.58 2nd....................................2.19 3rd....................................1.41 4th....................................1.00 5th....................................0.83 Reverse................................3.17 Final Drive Ratio......................3.06 Overall Top Gear.......................2.54
ELECTRICAL SYSTEM Alternator.............................160A Battery................................630 CCA, maintenance-free
DIMENSIONS AND CAPACITIES Wheelbase, in. (mm)....................116.0 (2,946) Track, Front, in. (mm).................63.0 (1603) Track, Rear, in. (mm)..................63.1 (1604) Overall Length, in. (mm)...............197.7 (5,023) Overall Width, in. (mm)................75.7 (1,923) Overall Height, in. (mm)...............57.0 (1,448) Ground Clearance, in. (mm).............@ curb 5.5 (140.6) Frontal Area, sq. ft. (sq. m)..........25.3 (2.35) Drag Coefficient.......................0.353 (9.01 CdA) Curb Weight, estimated, lb. (kg)...... 4140 (1878) Weight Distribution, percent F/R...... 55.6/44.4 Fuel Tank Capacity, gal............... 19 gallons
ACCOMMODATIONS Seating Capacity, F/R..................2/3 Front Seat Headroom, in. (mm)..........39.5 (1,004) Leg Room, in. (mm).....................42.0 (1,067) Shoulder Room, in. (mm)................58.2 (1,478) Hip Room, in. (mm) ....................54.7 (1,390) Seat Travel, mm .......................Interior driver – 270 mm, Passenger – 220 mm Recliner Angle Range, deg..............Interior driver – 86 deg. passenger – 69 deg. SAE Front Volume Index, cu.ft.(cu.m)...55.8 (1.58) Rear Seat Headroom, in. (mm)...........37.4 (951) Leg Room, in. (mm).....................32.6 (829) Knee Clearance, in. (mm)...............1.2 (31.1) Shoulder Room, in. (mm)................53.9 (1,370) Hip Room, in. (mm).....................51.4 (1,305.4) SAE Rear Seat Volume Index cuft (cu.m).38.1 (1.08) Total Interior Volume cuft(cu.m).......93.9 (2.66) SAE Cargo Volume cuft(cu.m)ger)........16.2 (0.459) EPA Interior Volume Index cuft(cu.m)...110.1 (3.12) Trunk Liftover Height, in. (mm)........33.0 (839) All dimensions measured at curb weight with standard tires.
BODY Layout.................................Longitudinal front engine, rear-wheel drive Construction ..........................Unitized steel body
STEERING Type...................................Rack and pinion with hydraulic power assist Overall Ratio..........................16.1:1 Turning Diameter (curb-to-curb)........37.5 ft. (11.48 m) Steering Turns (lock-to-lock)..........2.75
SUSPENSION Front..................................Independent SLA with high upper “A” arm, coil spring over Bilstein .......................................monotube gas-charged shock absorbers and stabilizer bar Rear...................................Five-link independent with coil springs, link-type stabilizer bar, .......................................Bilstein monotube gas-charged shock abs & isolated susp cradle
TIRES Size and Type..........................245/45 R20 frt P255/45 R20 rr 3-season tires Mfr. and Model.........................Goodyear F1 Supercar Revs per Mile..........................726 frt/718 rr Opt. Size and Type.....................245/45 R20 all-season performance Mfr. and Model.........................Goodyear RSA/SRT Revs per Mile (km).....................731 (456) Other sizes and brands may also be used.
WHEELS Type and Material......................Fully forged aluminum Size ..................................20 x 9.0
BRAKES Front Rotor Size and Type..............14.2 x 1.26 ( 360 x 32.0 ) vented Caliper Size and Type..................1.73 (44) Brembo 4-piston fixed with aluminum housing Swept Area.............................351 sq. in. (2261 sq. cm) Rear Rotor Size and Type...............13.8 x 1.10 (350 x 28) vented Caliper Size and Type..................11.26 (32) Brembo 4-piston fixed with aluminum housing Swept Area.............................316 sq. in. (2036 sq. cm) Four-Wheel Anti-Lock and Traction Control Included Electronic Stability Control and Brake Assist Included Brake Knockback Mitigation Included Power Assist Type......................8 + 9 (203 + 209) tandem-diaphragm vacuum booster
but a curb weight of 4140lbs... omfg. Lose some weight on that shit. The old challengers only weighed in at around 3,200lbs iirc. this car is almost a half ton heavier... wtf. I thought mustangs were bad...
[Edited on February 11, 2008 at 12:59 PM. Reason : yuck] 2/11/2008 12:57:16 PM |
sumfoo1 soup du hier 41043 Posts user info edit post |
ITS A 2 DOOR 300C 2/11/2008 1:23:14 PM |
Golovko All American 27023 Posts user info edit post |
danmangt40 = redneck? 2/11/2008 3:57:51 PM |
Jeepin4x4 #Pack9 35774 Posts user info edit post |
wow, i must say i am completely in love with that car. Its beautiful. Yeah, the interior is bland, but i'm never gonna have one. Looks alone on the outside are enough...man that thing is awesome.
nvm, the camaro is damn hot
[Edited on February 11, 2008 at 4:27 PM. Reason : add] 2/11/2008 4:25:04 PM |
El Nachó special helper 16370 Posts user info edit post |
I want to sex that car.
Quote : | "maybe I am missing something but that car is hideous" |
Yes, you are missing something. It's called taste.2/11/2008 5:00:20 PM |
shmorri2 All American 10003 Posts user info edit post |
btw...
^x19
V1 FTMFW 2/11/2008 5:52:59 PM |
chargercrazy All American 2695 Posts user info edit post |
Quote : | "Estimated EPA Fuel Economy, mpg........13/18" |
Sweet!2/11/2008 6:41:00 PM |
El Nachó special helper 16370 Posts user info edit post |
Tapdancing Christ, man learn to use the quote button.
If you actually think that anyone is gonna count 19 posts up, you're a fucking moron.2/12/2008 12:37:26 AM |
danmangt40 All American 2349 Posts user info edit post |
^^another reason to wait for the r/t
[Edited on February 12, 2008 at 6:08 PM. Reason : =/= ":busted:".... dunno wtf I got that...] 2/12/2008 6:07:40 PM |
danmangt40 All American 2349 Posts user info edit post |
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UsO1nTUM6KY
bitchin' promo vid of the challenger
[Edited on February 14, 2008 at 8:05 PM. Reason : .] 2/14/2008 8:03:52 PM |
0EPII1 All American 42541 Posts user info edit post |
Damn... what a color!
Dodge Challenger #43 Auction Started
Special color 2008 Dodge Challenger SRT-8 #43 is being auctioned off to the Highest bidder, whose bid now sits at USD55,000.
Quote : | "A bidding war has begun on eBay where the big prize is a 2008 Dodge Challenger SRT-8. While this in itself may not sound too exciting, the goose bumps come in when you hear that of all the Challengers about to flood the market, only one will be dressed in B5 Blue, the colour in which some of the original 1970 models came in.
An entire package of goodies awaits the winning bidder, whose money will proceed to the Victory Junction Gang which is an organization dedicated to enriching the lives of children with chronic illnesses. There are VIP passes into the Dodge Challenger 500 NASCAR race at the Darlington Raceway in South Carolina, return flights and accommodation for two in addition. Plus you get to meet Kyle Petty who founded Victory Junction Gang." |
2/15/2008 11:19:55 AM |
chargercrazy All American 2695 Posts user info edit post |
The question is are they going to eventually dress one in Panther Pink. 2/15/2008 5:00:55 PM |
Shaggy All American 17820 Posts user info edit post |
looks hot. 2/15/2008 5:05:50 PM |
0EPII1 All American 42541 Posts user info edit post |
^^^
Quote : | "Recently sold on eBay for $228,143.43" |
That's Challenger #43.
[Edited on February 25, 2008 at 9:04 PM. Reason : ]2/25/2008 8:53:59 PM |
arghx Deucefest '04 7584 Posts user info edit post |
i wonder if this car will have serious traction or wheelhop issues 2/25/2008 11:50:14 PM |
1in10^9 All American 7451 Posts user info edit post |
You have to like this car for what it is. I could careless if it came in 318 with sub 200hp. You buy this car for exterior. 20" wheels are gay and narrow. Some wide 18" or 19" would be a much better choice. 2/26/2008 3:22:33 AM |
stowaway All American 11770 Posts user info edit post |
I haven't heard that the other LX cars are having traction problems or any wheel hop, so I wouldn't expect this to, either. It's not a GM car so it's diff won't explode, either. 2/26/2008 9:04:22 AM |