What would be different? I think the outcome would be the same.

5/21/2008 7:27:48 PM

I can't admit the premise.

We didn't need Vietnam then, and we don't need one now.

5/21/2008 8:53:42 PM

We'd have that ray gun that makes it feel like your skin is burning.

But this entire premise is retarded.

5/21/2008 9:29:40 PM

i think the causulties would be way better in our favor....prolly lose like 10k people instead of like 55k people...prolly would end up killing 2x or 3x as many gooks

5/21/2008 9:46:25 PM

if you are talking pure militarily, then yes^

this makes no sense anywhere else though

5/21/2008 9:54:15 PM

+

+

=

5/21/2008 9:57:13 PM

lol

5/21/2008 10:12:55 PM

"In the war of my youth, World War II, I volunteered for military service at the age of 19 and flew 35 combat missions, winning the Distinguished Flying Cross as the pilot of a B-24 bomber. By contrast, in the war of his youth, the Vietnam War, Cheney got five deferments and has never seen a day of combat — a record matched by President Bush.

...instead of listening to the foolishness of the neoconservative ideologues, the Cheney-Bush team might better heed the words of a real conservative, Edmund Burke: "A conscientious man would be cautious how he dealt in blood." "

5/21/2008 11:43:34 PM

I would take take the opportunity to try heroin.

5/21/2008 11:59:40 PM

http://youtube.com/watch?v=LV7TMFceriw&feature=related

5/22/2008 2:42:20 AM