]
3/7/2009 10:53:40 PM
send it to tips@consumerist.com
3/7/2009 10:54:28 PM
umop apisdn
3/7/2009 10:55:14 PM
send it to the rotateomatic
3/7/2009 10:55:26 PM
if you read it, normally to buy 3 would cost 3.29, or is there something else I am missing?
3/7/2009 11:28:57 PM
the normal price is 2 for $2 or 1 for $1.29the advertised sale price is 3 for $3 or 1 for $1.29
3/7/2009 11:29:57 PM
Yeah so if you bought 3 it would be2/$2.00 + 1/$1.29 = $3.29instead they are saving you the 29 cents.its not rocket scienceI'm Big Business and i approved this message./]
3/7/2009 11:31:13 PM
you would be retarded to buy 3 if it were 2 for $2why not just get 4
3/7/2009 11:34:52 PM
maybe you didn't have the money for 4.maybe you don't want 3.maybe the store is trying to rip you off.maybe there is a limit on the sale and you can only get 2.I'm Big Business and i approved this message.[Edited on March 7, 2009 at 11:36 PM. Reason : pick one]/]
3/7/2009 11:36:37 PM
no, they're forcing him to buy MORE to qualify for the same percentage savings (19.3%)
3/7/2009 11:36:47 PM
Do you really want to question a man whose handle is Big Business on this topic?
3/8/2009 12:10:52 AM
no, if a store is selling two junior mints for 2$, where they regularly would be $1.29, its a sale on junior mints. the sale price would be split per item. its like going to food dog and buying a bag of chips for $1.50 when the sale is buy one get one free on a $3 bag. there aren't really sales that require you to buy a certain number of items.[Edited on March 8, 2009 at 12:15 AM. Reason : ergo, 3/3$ is the same sale.]
3/8/2009 12:14:47 AM
sad that you retards are actually making a fuss over this.DONT BUY THEM THEN
3/8/2009 12:19:10 AM
The plane takes off.
3/8/2009 12:25:24 AM
The plane DOES NOT take off.
3/8/2009 12:36:16 PM
the jar breaks
3/8/2009 12:40:34 PM
in my butt?
3/8/2009 12:40:56 PM
3/8/2009 12:42:31 PM
But they're Junior Mints, everyone loves Junior Mints.It's a problem for MythBusters.
3/8/2009 12:43:34 PM
I don't like Junior Mints, so fuck you.
3/8/2009 12:47:17 PM
Maybe we don't need MythBusters, I guess Ronny can just do it on his own.
3/8/2009 12:50:04 PM
3/8/2009 12:51:24 PM
victorias secret is not a proprietor of foodstuffsi should have specified that i was speaking about grocery storesgod forbid anyone make an inference on here[Edited on March 8, 2009 at 12:53 PM. Reason : .]
3/8/2009 12:52:24 PM
Walgreens is retarded. This is news to you?
3/8/2009 12:53:54 PM
i dont think it is a fair inference to make. we talkin' bout dat retail sale.[Edited on March 8, 2009 at 1:00 PM. Reason : but yes ive never had this issue at a grocery store. ]
3/8/2009 12:59:56 PM
No, at walgreens you do have to buy the number of items to get the retail price. buy 3 for $3 or 2 for $2.58 when they'd normally be 2 for $2. But the fucked up thing is after you reach that quantity, each additional one will ring up for a dollar. So everyday you can get them 3 for $3 or 5 for $5 etc.This is one of the MANY things that shows how stupid this chain is. I only shop there when they give me free stuff because of stuff like this.
3/8/2009 2:49:52 PM
3/8/2009 3:06:38 PM
THAT SHIT FROZE IN MAH DORM ROOM FREEZER
3/8/2009 3:22:23 PM