Men type like they talk.I don't know what women are thinking when they type. Case in point:
5/22/2009 3:16:15 PM
no shit. i can never figure out if a chick is mad or happy or what from her typed communications
5/22/2009 3:18:02 PM
eat shit and die you fucking hillbilly prick
5/22/2009 3:21:38 PM
AHA
5/22/2009 3:22:49 PM
I can't stand the over-use of exclamation marks!
5/22/2009 3:23:57 PM
hahaha thumper shows that a woman can, in fact, be direct about her emotions when typing
5/22/2009 3:24:46 PM
and omg you can't use emoticons as punctuation lol
5/22/2009 3:26:08 PM
i'm having such a great day [Edited on May 22, 2009 at 3:27 PM. Reason : ^yes you can, i do it all the time]
5/22/2009 3:26:57 PM
is that sarcasm?this is what i'm talking about!
5/22/2009 3:27:45 PM
i think girls want to fuck me whenever they are overly friendly in their texts and emailsit works out like 6 percent of the time
5/22/2009 3:29:12 PM
5/22/2009 3:29:20 PM
one of these things is not like the others....
5/22/2009 3:29:59 PM
i'm a womani don't have to mean what i type
5/22/2009 3:30:49 PM
are you bleeding?
5/22/2009 3:35:56 PM
Some women are representative of all women.This is scientific.
5/22/2009 3:47:32 PM
Woooohooooooo 0:-)
5/22/2009 4:04:32 PM
!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!*!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
5/22/2009 4:10:23 PM
5/22/2009 4:13:49 PM
^i'd actually like to see that.
5/22/2009 4:19:49 PM
I'd like to read it.
5/22/2009 4:21:10 PM
"Men rated competent women to be less likeable and more threatening than their male counterparts."-Gender and communication at work By Mary Barrett, Marilyn Davidson
5/22/2009 4:38:37 PM
5/22/2009 4:39:20 PM
^^some of them could have just been ugly. did they do a control for looks? in engineering i've dealt with a few competent women who were quite pretty and as a result became very attractive as coworkers and potential mates.
5/22/2009 4:44:21 PM
I gave you the title and author of the book.I'm not answering 500 questions on it or the study they mentioned.
5/22/2009 4:47:05 PM
a simple "i don't know" would have sufficed. its sort of hard to call that study "science"
5/22/2009 4:48:53 PM
Really? It's published in a peer-reviewed journal, I don't know how that's not science.Oh wait, you didn't bother to investigate it, you just wanted to insult me.
5/22/2009 4:50:11 PM
actually i've been reading the excerpts at google books and have seen not seen it stated that it has been published in a reputable journal. peer-reviewed does not always constitute good nor does it give real credibility. so far from what i've read it seems like a lot of non sequiturs to reach conclusions. granted i haven't read it all so i really don't know.
5/22/2009 4:53:01 PM
i tend to type like i talk/thinkyes, that includes the exclamation marks and smilies
5/22/2009 10:50:42 PM
5/22/2009 11:53:04 PM