Everybody acts like that was such a great call, but how much fucked up shit did he have to do before that for no one to raise an eyebrow when he whipped a sword out and said that he was going to halve an infant?

9/4/2009 7:38:50 PM

wut

9/4/2009 7:39:51 PM

who cares?

9/4/2009 7:41:51 PM

no one.

9/4/2009 7:43:17 PM

ok fine

then I'll step up and care

9/4/2009 7:46:04 PM

worthless without video

9/4/2009 7:50:32 PM

well its cause those stupid bitches had to fight over the baby. he sure taught them a lesson.

pretty smart too, cause only the real mother would spare the child by giving it to the other stupid bitch instead of letting him slice it up. i say, good call solomon.

9/4/2009 7:53:35 PM

and what's up with that one mother that would have been fine with half a baby? did she call dibs on the top half or the bottom?

9/4/2009 7:54:21 PM

I always assumed that the baby would be cut lengthwise.

9/4/2009 7:59:28 PM

same here

9/4/2009 8:24:18 PM

this sounds like...

http://thewolfweb.com/message_topic.aspx?topic=502234

9/4/2009 8:30:13 PM

Shit, you're right.

9/4/2009 8:30:53 PM

I've had this conversation with Hebrew scholars

9/4/2009 10:58:08 PM

Do you think he peaked with that one and then spent the rest of his life trying to make another great decision like that only to be told "It's a good solution, but it's no baby splitter."

In short, was splitting the baby like his black album?

9/4/2009 11:00:38 PM

pics or didn't happen

9/4/2009 11:11:28 PM

9/4/2009 11:12:49 PM

[/marko]

9/4/2009 11:24:11 PM

I thought this said king salmon, and was expecting pictures of baby pieces up and down the north west coast.

9/4/2009 11:27:28 PM

Quote :

"didn't happen"

9/4/2009 11:34:12 PM

^^^^BABY PENIS BABY PENIS

apparently back then everyone made overly elaborate hand gestures

9/5/2009 1:10:04 AM

Quote :

"how much fucked up shit did he have to do before that for no one to raise an eyebrow"

I've never thought about it like that before. Thought provoking stuff in chit chat tonight.

9/5/2009 1:34:17 AM

Some of you do realize that the baby was never actually split, right?

9/5/2009 1:37:14 AM

the other ho was like "well i was going to eat it anyway so half a baby is better than nothin for dinner"

9/5/2009 1:57:23 AM

Quote :

"hos got to eat, too"

9/5/2009 2:01:12 AM

Maybe his solution to everything was to cut a baby in half.

9/5/2009 3:02:40 PM

Quote :

""

anyone else confused that there's two babies in this picture?



[Edited on September 5, 2009 at 3:23 PM. Reason : cause one died and reading wikipedia is more informative than a painting ]

9/5/2009 3:21:39 PM

The one on the ground is the dead baby.

Damn, that lady sure looks cavalier about cutting up a baby.

9/5/2009 6:45:41 PM

also the baby being held up by his leg is one damn muscular baby.

9/5/2009 10:15:43 PM

9/5/2009 10:17:33 PM

Quote :

"and what's up with that one mother that would have been fine with half a baby? did she call dibs on the top half or the bottom?"

Quote :

"Legal analysis suggests that the case had to do with the laws of levirate marriage, where the baby was actually the lying woman's brother-in-law, whom she was obligated to marry unless he specifically refuses when he reaches age of maturity, which was still thirteen years away. Therefore, when Solomon suggested that the infant be split in half, the lying woman, seeing that the result of such a decision would better serve her interests as she would then be free to remarry, agreed. Thus was Solomon able to know who the real mother was.[1]"

9/5/2009 10:20:44 PM