grizzlyone Veteran 421 Posts user info edit post |
Like the title states looking for 2wd 90's Ranger 7.5" rear axle, preferrably with the 3.75 R&P. All I need the is the axle housing/tube and the diff no axles, brakes, etc. If someone has a 7.5" for cheap that isnt a 3.75 that would work to, as I could just change out the R&P 3/23/2011 10:01:49 AM |
sumfoo1 soup du hier 41043 Posts user info edit post |
caddy going rwd?? 3/23/2011 3:23:16 PM |
grizzlyone Veteran 421 Posts user info edit post |
AWD 3/23/2011 4:51:06 PM |
sumfoo1 soup du hier 41043 Posts user info edit post |
No wonder I was about to say an 8.8 would hold torque better but I'm betting a 7.5 would do fine with half of it. 3/23/2011 5:13:10 PM |
grizzlyone Veteran 421 Posts user info edit post |
yeah 'half' will only be around 120-140ish
and the 7.5" being smaller will help with clearance under the bed 3/24/2011 11:55:57 AM |
sumfoo1 soup du hier 41043 Posts user info edit post |
$165 from pull-a-part in charlotte.. i think its the whole assembly though. 3/24/2011 12:57:29 PM |
grizzlyone Veteran 421 Posts user info edit post |
yeah i am going to klq in durham sat, just thought it would post here first in case anyone have upgraded to an 8.8 or had one laying around 3/24/2011 1:26:09 PM |
sumfoo1 soup du hier 41043 Posts user info edit post |
ever thought of jeep parts? you can get a dana 35 for super cheap on any jeep forum they treat those things like the plague 3/24/2011 7:15:18 PM |
grizzlyone Veteran 421 Posts user info edit post |
The ranger axle is the perfect width to go right on, as with exploder parts rear disc will be pretty easy and cheap too 3/24/2011 7:23:56 PM |
sumfoo1 soup du hier 41043 Posts user info edit post |
k, i think the exploder axle is .5-1" narrower than pretty much the entire solid axle jeep line (i've done an 8.8 swap before) 3/24/2011 9:06:40 PM |