GreatGazoo All American 714 Posts user info edit post |
I'd have thought:
(1) this would constitute cruelty to animals by subjecting them (the dogs) to high levels of human student stress.
(2) surely free p**n produces the same effect at no cost to the government (i.e. the taxpayer)? [Disclaimer: statement not to be construed as advocating this option]12/14/2011 2:33:49 PM |
BubbleBobble :3 114242 Posts user info edit post |
12/14/2011 2:34:47 PM |
GrayFox33 TX R. Snake 10566 Posts user info edit post |
How did this get overlooked?
Though, it would take a strong individual to advocate free peen to relax students, and I feel like that may only be effective for ~50% of the student body involved. 12/29/2011 7:02:38 PM |
ncstatetke All American 41128 Posts user info edit post |
i read it as free poon 12/29/2011 7:12:47 PM |
GrayFox33 TX R. Snake 10566 Posts user info edit post |
Perhaps the ambiguity exists intentionally as an open suggestion that appeals to all genders, whether they prefer peen or poon.
12/29/2011 7:15:04 PM |
Solinari All American 16957 Posts user info edit post |
I don't think that free pain would produce the same effect, but maybe GreatGazoo is a masochist.
I'm not here to judge. 12/29/2011 7:20:56 PM |
ThePeter TWW CHAMPION 37709 Posts user info edit post |
Free **** **** 12/29/2011 10:00:14 PM |