quagmire02 All American 44225 Posts user info edit post |
i consider myself decent with SQL, but i'm an idiot when it comes to doing anything but the most basic things in excel...in this case, i have some data (hundreds of rows 25 columns wide) that i want to turn into some graphs, but i'm only concerned with data that matches certain criteria...let's say i have this:
+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+ | # | A | B | C | D | +-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+ | 1 | 1 | 9 | 9 | 4 | +-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+ | 2 | 5 | 2 | 2 | 2 | +-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+ | 3 | 1 | 9 | 5 | 2 | +-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+ | 4 | 3 | 9 | 2 | 1 | +-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+ and i only want the values for those rows where column A is 1 and column B is 9...i can easily do that in SQL, but how do i do that in excel? and yes, i have actually just imported the whole thing and set up a query to run through PHP 1/16/2012 10:34:46 PM |
qntmfred retired 40809 Posts user info edit post |
how robust of a solution are you looking for? is this for a couple one-off graphs and then you'll be done, or do you need to produce new graphs on an ongoing basis? are the queries any more complex than the A=1 and B=9 example? 1/16/2012 10:53:27 PM |
lewisje All American 9196 Posts user info edit post |
S-Q-Lite nuqqa 1/16/2012 10:59:18 PM |
dweedle All American 77386 Posts user info edit post |
How about a pivot table/chart ? 1/17/2012 12:23:01 AM |
skokiaan All American 26447 Posts user info edit post |
1/17/2012 2:00:15 AM |
quagmire02 All American 44225 Posts user info edit post |
Quote : | "how robust of a solution are you looking for? is this for a couple one-off graphs and then you'll be done, or do you need to produce new graphs on an ongoing basis? are the queries any more complex than the A=1 and B=9 example?" |
that's about as complex as it should be...maybe 3 requirements, but most likely just 2
it's just for creating some simple graphs
google tells me there is a "sqlite for excel"...but would any of that be dependent on others' machines and whether they have it installed? i'd rather just keep this a pure excel experience
Quote : | "How about a pivot table/chart ?" |
maybe...i didn't know what that was, but a quick google search tells me it might do what i want...i've never really used the wizards, just written out equations (and i was hoping that with only 2 restrictions, it might be a simple formula)1/17/2012 7:45:39 AM |
dweedle All American 77386 Posts user info edit post |
I first learned how to do pivot tables in my first job out of college...once I figured them out I used them every day from there-on
you can make one w/o using the wizard, on the right pane that pops up, drag the headings to the proper boxes and it will create it for you 1/17/2012 11:16:41 AM |
lewisje All American 9196 Posts user info edit post |
^^What you're asking for is something only a true RDBMS would provide...
maBIE try importing it into Access? (It supports yet another variant of SQL.) 1/17/2012 7:37:46 PM |
Ernie All American 45943 Posts user info edit post |
Quote : | "^^What you're asking for is something only a true RDBMS would provide... " |
There's one table here.
Why can't you just use Excel's built-in filter functionality?
[Edited on January 17, 2012 at 8:10 PM. Reason : I assume you can't because it's more complicated than you've explained and you want to do it on]
[Edited on January 17, 2012 at 8:10 PM. Reason : the fly]1/17/2012 8:09:47 PM |
smoothcrim Universal Magnetic! 18968 Posts user info edit post |
i just did something like this and used the built in excel filter. I was doing string values instead of integers as well 1/17/2012 8:59:40 PM |
Grandmaster All American 10829 Posts user info edit post |
Can I thread hijack? I'm not sure if I need to use VBA for this, built in filters, or a pivot table.
I have a time tracking solution that generates an IIF file for quickbooks. The problem is that the paycode headers are set globally because most people don't have a need to keep track of salaried time. I was hoping that I could do one export and run a macro that checked the name field and if it matched a salaried employee, it would change another field from Hourly to Salary. Or from hourly-p-t-o to salary-p-t-o.
So in the below example, If column D's value = Jane J Doe and F value = Hourly then change to Salary. If F value = Hourly p-t-o change to Salary p-t-o.
Stuff like this kind of piques my interest, despite having hated Intro to Java and whatever other programming courses I barely put forth the effort to pass, so I would definitely take any nudge in the correct direction or a starting point. Not necessarily looking for anyone to write the script.
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0AjGTO1ijgSqodFllODRqR2Y4WUsyeHNqaWpOSlFTUnc
Is an excel macro in VBA the right course? Or auto it, or what? =/
</thread.hijack> 2/15/2012 1:01:06 PM |
Chance Suspended 4725 Posts user info edit post |
vlookup 2/15/2012 7:04:10 PM |
Chance Suspended 4725 Posts user info edit post |
On Sheet 3 I have this
Jack Dick Hourly Jane Doe Salary
In the workbook, I inserted a named range called "Pay_Type" and made the cells on this sheet that range (A1-B2, essentially).
On Sheet 2 I started with this:
Name Pay Type Jane Doe Jack Dick
Note on sheet 3 they are sorted by name, this is important for VLOOKUP to work.
In column B2 I added this formula:
=VLOOKUP(A2,Pay_Type,2,FALSE), and pasted it down.
This says take the value in A2 and go look in the first column of the range pointed at by Pay_Type and when a match is found return whatever value is in the second column.2/15/2012 8:39:14 PM |
Grandmaster All American 10829 Posts user info edit post |
oh shit that might work. ....
Well, it's a starting point I suppose. Ultimately I'm going to have to automate this because it's going to be different data every pay period.
[Edited on February 15, 2012 at 8:45 PM. Reason : ] 2/15/2012 8:43:05 PM |
Chance Suspended 4725 Posts user info edit post |
Are your employees and their pay types at least not changing? 2/15/2012 9:48:09 PM |
neodata686 All American 11577 Posts user info edit post |
So I'm the opposite. I'm slowly learning SQL so be easy on me.
Here's my problem. I have a certain number of tables and there's a field in each table that matches. I know how to create joins to get matching records but lets say I want records that match on 50% of the tables or 75% of the tables.
My first thought would be simple arithmetic on some type of field with 1's in it (say count field).
So if record has a count/total tables of =>50% I would capture all records that are in 50%+ of the tables.
Or am I going about that entirely wrong? 5/3/2012 6:37:52 PM |
qntmfred retired 40809 Posts user info edit post |
do all your tables have the exact same schema? if so, why aren't you putting all the data in a single table? can you give a little more detail about your tables and the columns in it? it'll be easier to ask you the right questions if i can use an actual example from your situation 5/4/2012 10:01:10 AM |
neodata686 All American 11577 Posts user info edit post |
Yeah that would probably be best. It's 11 digit ID numbers by month. So 9 months of IDs. Each month is a table with ID in one field and count in another.
Currently I've been doing joins to grab IDs and counts across multiple months. How would I go about creating a single table with ID in one field then 9 fields (each month) with counts? 5/4/2012 10:22:38 AM |
synapse play so hard 60940 Posts user info edit post |
Quote : | "How would I go about creating a single table with ID in one field then 9 fields (each month) with counts?" |
Multiple joins in the same query...but it sounds like you're already doing that
If you could give us a sample query and an example of that ID it might help (me at least)
[Edited on May 4, 2012 at 10:39 AM. Reason : I don't think I like your DBA ]5/4/2012 10:37:02 AM |
neodata686 All American 11577 Posts user info edit post |
Ok well I'm open to suggested to fix it. 5/4/2012 10:38:00 AM |
qntmfred retired 40809 Posts user info edit post |
+------+--------------+-------------+---------+ | Id | Month | Code | Count | +------+--------------+-------------+---------+ | 1 | 2012-01-01 | 123456789 | 9 | +------+--------------+-------------+---------+ | 2 | 2012-01-01 | 987654321 | 2 | +------+--------------+-------------+---------+ | 3 | 2012-01-01 | 567891234 | 5 | +------+--------------+-------------+---------+ | 4 | 2012-02-01 | 123456789 | 8 | +------+--------------+-------------+---------+ | 5 | 2012-02-01 | 987654321 | 0 | +------+--------------+-------------+---------+ | 6 | 2012-02-01 | 567891234 | 1 | +------+--------------+-------------+---------+ | 7 | 2012-03-01 | 123456789 | 1 | +------+--------------+-------------+---------+ | 8 | 2012-03-01 | 987654321 | 4 | +------+--------------+-------------+---------+ | 9 | 2012-03-01 | 567891234 | 8 | +------+--------------+-------------+---------+ | 10 | 2012-04-01 | 123456789 | 12 | +------+--------------+-------------+---------+ | 11 | 2012-04-01 | 987654321 | 3 | +------+--------------+-------------+---------+ | 12 | 2012-04-01 | 567891234 | 8 | +------+--------------+-------------+---------+
btw which rdbms are you using? mysql? sql server? your % counts query could be different depending on what you're using
this is kinda sloppy, but this might work for you
http://sqlfiddle.com/#!3/2dabc/1
declare @totalmonths int select @totalmonths = count(distinct month) from data
select distinct code, (select count(*) * 1.0 from data d2 where d2.code = d.code) / @totalmonths from data d
[Edited on May 4, 2012 at 11:39 AM. Reason : ,]5/4/2012 11:03:56 AM |
neodata686 All American 11577 Posts user info edit post |
Ok simple query question.
I have 2 tables each with 2 fields. IDs and counts again. I want to union both tables together and if there are duplicates then add the count fields together.
I can't seem to figure out how to do this in one step... 5/14/2012 3:42:45 PM |
GenghisJohn bonafide 10252 Posts user info edit post |
Okay so I'm not sure how to get it in one query, but why are they in separate tables if they have the same columns? I'm assuming it has to do with monthly finance records or something?
In any case, I'd create a third table to dump your first two into -- where you don't have id as a primary key so you can have duplicates.
so you'd have table_a with values of your codes and their count
and table_b with their codes and counts
CREATE `table_c`
insert into table_c select * from table_a; insert into table_c select * from table_b;
select id,SUM(count) from table_c group by id;
Not sure if this is what you are looking for, I'm sure someone else has a more elegant solution.] 5/14/2012 7:07:16 PM |
neodata686 All American 11577 Posts user info edit post |
Another question...
My table has IDs and fields for 3 months which contain counts.
I'd like to run a query that returns IDs that have 4 or more counts in 2 or more months.
So ID 12345: Jan: 1 Feb: 1 Mar: 1
Would not qualify.
ID 54321: Jan: 2 Feb: 0 Mar: 4
Would qualify.
Make sense? 6/20/2012 10:43:54 AM |
qntmfred retired 40809 Posts user info edit post |
id 54321 only has 1 month with 4 or more counts. doesn't that mean it does not qualify? 6/20/2012 11:02:08 AM |
neodata686 All American 11577 Posts user info edit post |
No total is 4 or more. So ID 54321 would be a total of 6 so it would quality for 4+. 6/20/2012 11:13:17 AM |
neodata686 All American 11577 Posts user info edit post |
Figured it out using case statements. Essentially if jan > 0 + feb > 0 etc. 6/21/2012 11:27:51 AM |