User not logged in - login - register
Home Calendar Books School Tool Photo Gallery Message Boards Users Statistics Advertise Site Info
go to bottom | |
 Message Boards » » More media consolidation: Danger To Democracy Page [1]  
eyewall41
All American
2254 Posts
user info
edit post

In 1983 the majority of media in the US was controlled by 50 companies. Today that number is 6. The FCC is considering making the situation even worse, only this time quietly without public input. Bernie Sanders explains the danger here:

http://vimeo.com/55073967

12/8/2012 8:22:05 PM

goalielax
All American
11252 Posts
user info
edit post

nconspiracylb

12/9/2012 3:03:04 PM

LoneSnark
All American
12317 Posts
user info
edit post

It doesn't matter how many competitors you have. What matters is low barriers to entry, which doesn't seem to be a problem nowadays thanks to the internet.

12/9/2012 11:49:37 PM

Dentaldamn
All American
9974 Posts
user info
edit post

low barrier?

serious?

12/10/2012 12:12:58 AM

dtownral
Suspended
26632 Posts
user info
edit post

yeah, my blog has as many viewers as the Fox Broadcasting Company does between all of their outlets, why doesn't yours?

12/10/2012 8:17:27 AM

goalielax
All American
11252 Posts
user info
edit post

what was the barrier to, say, Huffington Post or Drudge?

12/10/2012 9:23:27 AM

Str8Foolish
All American
4852 Posts
user info
edit post

lmao low barriers to entry ahaha

Quote :
"what was the barrier to, say, Huffington Post or Drudge?"


The Drudge Report came to prominence basically by breaking a few stories on the Clinton sex scandal, at a time when the Internet as a mass-media service was a new thing and the market was open for such an aggregator.

Huffington post got big because it billed itself as the liberal version of Drudge.

Neither of them broke into a mature market, they both filled a pre-existing void.

[Edited on December 10, 2012 at 10:39 AM. Reason : .]

12/10/2012 10:36:49 AM

RedGuard
All American
5596 Posts
user info
edit post

Not sure if Huffington or Drudge are good models of comparison either. They're both news aggregators; neither generates all that much content. Many of the so-called news blogs you see work that way as well. The question is what happens as their news sources disappear or get paywalled away?

12/10/2012 3:49:59 PM

Shaggy
All American
17820 Posts
user info
edit post

consolidation is an unfortunate side effect of the freedom of the internet. no one wants to pay directly for content they're used to getting for free and web advertisement is so shitty that it doesnt cover the costs for all but the largest of the large media companies. The result is smaller companies go out of business or get eaten by the larger ones.

If someone does come up with an effective paywall system (they wont) then this might change and smaller time guys might become more viable.

News media is kind of fucked and consolidation is a symptom, not the cause.

12/10/2012 4:52:39 PM

 Message Boards » The Soap Box » More media consolidation: Danger To Democracy Page [1]  
go to top | |
Admin Options : move topic | lock topic

© 2024 by The Wolf Web - All Rights Reserved.
The material located at this site is not endorsed, sponsored or provided by or on behalf of North Carolina State University.
Powered by CrazyWeb v2.38 - our disclaimer.