User not logged in - login - register
Home Calendar Books School Tool Photo Gallery Message Boards Users Statistics Advertise Site Info
go to bottom | |
 Message Boards » » TKE-Teg which car isn't too heavy Page [1]  
CuntPunter
Veteran
429 Posts
user info
edit post

Because I don't think I've ever seen you post

"This car is the perfect weight..." or
"This car actually could stand to use more weight..." or
"Anything positive about the weight of the car"


Seriously, every comment you make about a car model you say something about the weight of the car and it's usually never good.

It's...weird.

9/10/2014 11:17:17 PM

MaximaDrvr

10401 Posts
user info
edit post

Duke's 7

9/10/2014 11:30:44 PM

theDuke866
All American
52838 Posts
user info
edit post

I mean, he's not wrong. Shit's gotten absolutely absurd.




^ Fuckin' A. 1300 lbs, and not really especially built to be a flyweight example.

[Edited on September 11, 2014 at 12:09 AM. Reason : ]

[Edited on September 11, 2014 at 12:14 AM. Reason : and no goddamn snitching black boxes, either.]

9/11/2014 12:06:56 AM

jaZon
All American
27048 Posts
user info
edit post

That thing is a lard ass

Would not hit it

[Edited on September 11, 2014 at 12:43 AM. Reason : ]

9/11/2014 12:43:25 AM

Hiro
All American
4673 Posts
user info
edit post

I'm with Teg and Duke. However, I'm pretty sure we can agree that the S2000 and the Cayman S are pretty aggressive and well balanced vehicles. Anything 1.5 Tons or less is good in my book, and the 3000lb limit is a stretch for some cars...

9/11/2014 1:15:33 AM

TKE-Teg
All American
43409 Posts
user info
edit post

What Hiro and Duke said. If I had to pick a relatively new car to commend, the latest M3/M4 is actually lightweight for what it is.

9/11/2014 8:33:55 AM

Dr Pepper
All American
3583 Posts
user info
edit post

Teg, you don't have weight constraints for your women, do you?

I have a buddy that likes 'em underweight by about 10-15#.

9/11/2014 8:48:47 AM

TKE-Teg
All American
43409 Posts
user info
edit post

In general I like my women fit. But there is a sliding scale for the boob to overall weight ratio.

9/11/2014 10:38:43 AM

sumfoo1
soup du hier
41043 Posts
user info
edit post

6' 135-145 nice cs err wait.. i married her...

9/11/2014 10:40:14 AM

Dr Pepper
All American
3583 Posts
user info
edit post

haha

I like 'em thick.

9/11/2014 11:02:45 AM

TKE-Teg
All American
43409 Posts
user info
edit post

Here's a car that I approve of: The new 2016 Audi TT weighs in at 2712 lb, and that's with Quattro AWD. That's 312 lbs less than the 2015 model with comparable drivetrain.

[Edited on September 11, 2014 at 1:00 PM. Reason : clap clap]

9/11/2014 12:55:29 PM

1in10^9
All American
7451 Posts
user info
edit post

^Is that Audi on paper spec or real world measurement? I ask because BMW pulls that crap all the time. New F80 M3 on paper is 200-300lb less than previous model, but in real world it is more like 50-100lb less. Manufacturers literally confused and conquer with different weight specs...dry, curb...etc. I can't stand it.

9/11/2014 4:30:50 PM

TKE-Teg
All American
43409 Posts
user info
edit post

Not sure 100%, that's the weight AB stated in their first drive. The TT also uses the same platform as the MK7 Golf and that car is also considerably lighter.

So hopefully it's the real deal.

9/12/2014 8:29:43 AM

dustm
All American
14296 Posts
user info
edit post

relevant:

10/27/2014 12:50:20 AM

TKE-Teg
All American
43409 Posts
user info
edit post

Is that a joke in reference to the weight of the current 991 911?

10/27/2014 10:28:50 AM

Ahmet
All American
4279 Posts
user info
edit post

I have to point out about the 996, it was far stiffer, more powerful, somewhat bigger and significantly lighter than the 993 that it replaced. 997 was quite close in weight, nearly identical in size while being stiffer and more powerful still.

10/27/2014 12:07:12 PM

dustm
All American
14296 Posts
user info
edit post

^^ not sure what the artist intended specifically. I took it as an artistic/ exaggerated take on cars getting larger/heavier.

[Edited on October 28, 2014 at 1:59 AM. Reason : in general]

10/28/2014 1:56:56 AM

Jek
All American
709 Posts
user info
edit post

From what I remember reading, the 911 above is an artist's commentary on what will happen if we continue to allow safety regulations to grow and how it will impact the art of car design. Specifically I think the pedestrian impact standards in Europe were what triggered the art piece. And although it's obviously an exaggeration, I do hate what the pedestrian impact stuff has done to car design.

10/28/2014 8:52:17 AM

TKE-Teg
All American
43409 Posts
user info
edit post

It's a fucking travesty that might ruin the style of cars for...ever.

10/28/2014 10:09:19 AM

BlackJesus
Suspended
13089 Posts
user info
edit post

Charger Hellcat weighs 4600lbs discuss.

10/29/2014 1:56:32 PM

Hiro
All American
4673 Posts
user info
edit post

Hellcat is a fucking fatcat. Put that bitch on a diet.

10/29/2014 3:15:24 PM

Dr Pepper
All American
3583 Posts
user info
edit post

STILL...600+ to the wheels

10/29/2014 3:22:06 PM

TKE-Teg
All American
43409 Posts
user info
edit post

^^^^it's still considerably lighter than any other sedan with comparable power outputs. Like 400-800 lbs lighter. See: S65 AMG, Bentley Silver Spur, etc.

^^&^^^when you have that much horsepower nobody cares. Plus, its really just designed for straight lines...and lurid oversteering for turns

[Edited on October 29, 2014 at 4:08 PM. Reason : k]

10/29/2014 3:57:22 PM

Dr Pepper
All American
3583 Posts
user info
edit post

^this is the #1 reason why high hp 4x4 trucks have such a romantic appeal.

10/29/2014 4:03:19 PM

 Message Boards » The Garage » TKE-Teg which car isn't too heavy Page [1]  
go to top | |
Admin Options : move topic | lock topic

© 2024 by The Wolf Web - All Rights Reserved.
The material located at this site is not endorsed, sponsored or provided by or on behalf of North Carolina State University.
Powered by CrazyWeb v2.39 - our disclaimer.