If FroshKiller was as harcore fanboy as he wishes he was, he'd be bitching that Batman doesn't use a gun. And he'd be The Bat-Man.

6/17/2005 6:50:53 PM

NOW YOU'RE TALKIN BOUT MY BAT-MAN

6/17/2005 6:58:43 PM

And The Bat-Man wouldn't wear gloves... cause gloves are for pansies.

6/17/2005 7:01:50 PM

6/17/2005 7:04:18 PM

i was ok with the gun though i might not have been if i could have told how that one guy got shot in the foot

6/17/2005 7:04:35 PM

i'm sorry
this whole "qui gon was ra the whole time thing" has me confused

i thought ra was able to live forever by taking over bodies

i thought that was the point of the throwaway line "you left me for dead and burned my house down"

6/17/2005 10:29:36 PM

In a way, Bruce did leave Ra'z for dead. He left the Chinese-looking dude to die under the burning debri and instead rescued Ducard (who Bruce did not know was Ra'z). So even though Bruce saved Ra'z, his intention was in actually leaving him for dead, if that makes any sense. So the throwaway line is still valid.

6/17/2005 10:37:41 PM

Frosh, while agree that this Batman didn't stick to the origins closely, I'm shocked that you liked Spiderman and Xmen then. Cause damn did they screw over storylines in those two.

I liked the new batman, I thought the way they showed him fighting..ie sneaking around dodging in and out of shadows was pretty neat. And overall it was entertaining, which is all I ask of a movie. (I'm a big Hitchhikers Guide fanboy and I still thought the movie was entertaining.)

6/17/2005 10:47:58 PM

you folks are confusing fan-boy for connoisseur.

6/17/2005 10:52:18 PM

Well I was just making reference to someone saying that this is exactly like the Guide fanboys, its not exactly what they want.

6/17/2005 11:11:29 PM

6/17/2005 11:34:14 PM

all i can think of when i see that picture

/gravely voice
"i'm ronery, so ronery"

6/18/2005 12:18:09 AM

fucking awsome!

6/18/2005 1:35:30 AM

Batman, Batman Returns, and Batman Begins are the only Batman movies as far as I'm concerned.

6/18/2005 1:42:04 AM

Quote :

"Batman, Batman Returns, and Batman Begins are is the only Batman movies as far as I'm concerned."

[Edited on June 18, 2005 at 2:03 AM. Reason : ]

6/18/2005 2:03:30 AM

http://www4.ncsu.edu/~jacovil2/holdmethrillmekissmekillme.mp3

I'd embed, but this ain't no chit chat party.

6/18/2005 3:19:24 AM

we might not agree alot sandsanta, but that post is right on. i support that 100%. those are the only 3

6/18/2005 6:00:10 AM

6/18/2005 12:30:20 PM

ncWOLFsu

Sorry bro but Jack N. played a joker that unfortunately will not be topped by any actor.

For that reason, the 1st Batman will always be the best.

Also, Michael Keaton's Batman is still better then Christian Bale's, though not as badass. If that makes sense.l

[Edited on June 18, 2005 at 3:24 PM. Reason : .]

6/18/2005 3:23:31 PM

saw it today for the second time

if Crispin Glover doesnt get the role of Joker in the next movie, i'll be kinda saddened. i think he'd be perfect for the part.

6/18/2005 3:27:34 PM

You're kidding right?

Crispin Glover has the comedic value of Black Coffee.

6/18/2005 3:31:09 PM

nah Joker's a raving nutjob

Glover's a raving nutjob

i dont want comic relief. i want batshit crazy.

6/18/2005 3:42:40 PM

That would be awesome!

Jason agrees - he would be the best crazy man for the Joker. He says he'll be pissed off if he isn't

[Edited on June 18, 2005 at 3:57 PM. Reason : ]

6/18/2005 3:54:29 PM

folks

guy pearce for joker



it just makes too much sense

6/18/2005 3:58:41 PM

Guy Pearce is pretty cool but Crispin has much more of the feel that this movie has - dark, brooding, with insane bad guys.

6/18/2005 4:02:14 PM

nah, crispin is good for the subdued

pearce would be able to go nuts

plus
nolan...

6/18/2005 4:03:39 PM

Quote :

"Batman, Batman Returns,Batman: Mask of the Phantasmand Batman Begins are the only Batman movies as far as I'm concerned. "

6/18/2005 4:09:54 PM

I LIKE BATMAN BEYOND TOO FOLKS
CAN WE COUNT THAT MOVIE
AND MAYBE THE UNCUT RETURN OF THE JOKER MOVIE?
ALTHOUGH THAT SHIT GOT WIERD
IT WAS COOL TO SEE ROBIN KILL THE JOKER

6/18/2005 4:19:45 PM

I just finished Year One. It's an okay book, but personally I think Froshkiller's being a bitch about it.

I guess I thought that before, too. Oh well.

6/18/2005 4:26:16 PM

[Edited on June 18, 2005 at 5:13 PM. Reason : ]

6/18/2005 5:08:06 PM

i likey!!!

6/18/2005 5:19:35 PM

BIG QUESTION THOUGH:

if Batman fails to break the overall budget of $120+advertising, will they still go forward with a sequel? i really feel like this movie will have great legs throughout the summer though. THOUGHTS??

6/18/2005 5:21:36 PM

too much money to be made off anciliary products for sequels not to be made

but yes, we need to hope this movie makes mad box office and great dvd
or the producers will have to rely on the products to make their dinero

which means

too many villains
too many gadgets

so, it only making like 15 million yesterday isn't really good news
friday should have been a lot bigger take

[Edited on June 18, 2005 at 5:27 PM. Reason : i think its made roughly 40 million since open]

6/18/2005 5:26:58 PM

gary busey as joker

ehe

6/18/2005 5:42:22 PM

^lol, you may actually be onto something.

6/18/2005 6:08:00 PM

Quote :

"I LIKE BATMAN BEYOND TOO FOLKS CAN WE COUNT THAT MOVIE AND MAYBE THE UNCUT RETURN OF THE JOKER MOVIE? ALTHOUGH THAT SHIT GOT WIERD IT WAS COOL TO SEE ROBIN KILL THE JOKER"

I like Batman Beyond, but neither the premiere nor "Return of the Joker" matched the story of "Mask of the Phantasm". Except for the flashback, the "Return of the Joker" is pretty mediocre IMO. And Phantasm has an opera sing the Batman theme. *drools*

6/18/2005 6:13:39 PM

Has a single one of you stupid fucks bothered to read anything I've posted?

6/18/2005 8:03:03 PM

I read what you posted, I'm not a stupid fuck.

You broke a little bitch's heart.

6/18/2005 8:08:28 PM

I haven't said anything fanboyish. I have a strong opinion, and I've backed it up with reasons. If I didn't have a few dozen pics of Batgirl in my gallery, wouldn't none of you be saying that shit.

6/18/2005 8:10:35 PM

I read what you said, man. I understand you, but I disagree with you.

Keep in mind the first thing you were complaining about was that you thought it was based on Year One but that it wasn't anything like it. The thing is, it wasn't the intention to be a recreation of Year One. And you get all up in arms about stuff like going to the opera instead of Zorro. And you didn't even catch the big reveal with Ra's Al Ghul. So WHAT EVER. My dad can beat up your dad.

6/18/2005 8:44:01 PM

I thought it was going to be Year One, turns out it wasn't, but I still think it sucked as a Batman movie and was a mediocre movie on its own merits.

6/18/2005 8:51:22 PM

Can a world exist where two different opinions are present?

6/18/2005 8:52:56 PM

I'm telling you, man, it's the same thing as people saying Episode III was good.

6/18/2005 9:01:46 PM

I thought Episode III was good with numerous "buts".

I thought Batman Begins was good. With numerous butts.

6/18/2005 9:04:04 PM

for an english major, Frosh has shitty analyzation skills

[Edited on June 18, 2005 at 9:07 PM. Reason : comma]

6/18/2005 9:06:53 PM

Quote :

"you folks are confusing fan-boy for connoisseur"

fuck
i just realized that is technically the inverse of my intention

frosh = connoisseur

your opinions of his opinions = fan-boy

[Edited on June 18, 2005 at 9:30 PM. Reason : `]

6/18/2005 9:29:18 PM

i'm just seeking a means to fight injustice

6/18/2005 9:32:01 PM

heh
this chick on my buddy list STILL has "It's not about who we are underneath. It's about what we do that defines us." for her away message

6/18/2005 9:35:45 PM

Okay people quoting, you know, stuff like that, they're just deep as shit.

6/18/2005 9:39:20 PM

but...but...the movie did such a great job at displaying and advertising them as meaningful

6/18/2005 9:45:25 PM