I like his threads.

8/30/2007 6:39:00 PM

Quote :

"Why does everyone want Salisburyboy suspended? I don't get it. You can just as easily NOT click on his threads"

Quote :

"Why does everyone want Salisburyboy suspended? I don't get it. You can just as easily NOT click on his threads"

Quote :

"Why does everyone want Salisburyboy suspended? I don't get it. You can just as easily NOT click on his threads"

Quote :

"Why does everyone want Salisburyboy suspended? I don't get it. You can just as easily NOT click on his threads"

Quote :

"Why does everyone want Salisburyboy suspended? I don't get it. You can just as easily NOT click on his threads"

Quote :

"Why does everyone want Salisburyboy suspended? I don't get it. You can just as easily NOT click on his threads"

Quote :

"Why does everyone want Salisburyboy suspended? I don't get it. You can just as easily NOT click on his threads"

Quote :

"Why does everyone want Salisburyboy suspended? I don't get it. You can just as easily NOT click on his threads"

Seriously, salisburyboy is not the reason this shit is 100+ posts long

8/30/2007 6:56:09 PM

Quote :

"I have no problem with the non-white peoples of the world having nations of their own for themselves. So why shouldn't whites also have nations of their own?"

If this meant, "We should not allow brown people to come into the country," or even, "We should deport all the brown people," I wouldn't be advocating your termination for it. But as of this thread you have clearly meant it as, "We should put the brown people to the sword."

Quote :

"You can just as easily NOT click on his threads....but for some of us...its quite entertaining."

1) It is an incite to violence
2) It reflects very poorly on the site
3) Saying, "Just don't click on it" is not too far from telling Chamberlain, "Just don't pay Hitler any mind, you can just as easily not tune into German radio." And look where that got us. Simply saying "Ignore it" is not an option here.

8/30/2007 7:01:49 PM

(3) Couldn't come up with a more false analogy.

If you leave hitler alone, you get harmed. If you leave salisburyboy's threads alone, your well-being actually goes up and you address (2) because his threads will sink down.

8/30/2007 7:42:32 PM

That's all well and good if we just take it on faith that nobody in this country will ever listen to people like Salisburyboy ever again.

8/30/2007 7:54:31 PM

Buh, I didn't realize we were talking about anything other than soap box policy. Furthermore, whether or not people listen to people like salisburyboy has no relevance to whether or not people listen to salisburyboy.

The likelihood of someone in TSB being convinced to change their mind is already close to zero. I can't imagine the likelihood of someone being convinced by salisburyboy to change their mind.

(I don't know about what crazy javascript shit you premies might see when you click on threads, but we normies don't start turning into neonazis just by clicking on his threads.)

8/30/2007 8:09:40 PM

Quote :

"Seriously, salisburyboy is not the reason this shit is 100+ posts long"

signed.



(i swear, you people )




[Edited on August 30, 2007 at 8:58 PM. Reason : ]

8/30/2007 8:58:36 PM

this thread crosses the line. I don't usually say that either.

8/30/2007 9:17:29 PM

Quote :

" 1) It is an incite to violence 2) It reflects very poorly on the site 3) Saying, "Just don't click on it" is not too far from telling Chamberlain, "Just don't pay Hitler any mind, you can just as easily not tune into German radio." And look where that got us. Simply saying "Ignore it" is not an option here."

you're right. he has a very dangerous following and last i heard sallisburyboy was a man of power and is forcing his ideology on American citizens across the country. Oh and also TWW is known to be a great source of knowledge and serious business so we better not let threads like this bring that image down.

8/30/2007 9:37:39 PM

Quote :

"I like his threads."

- esgargs

You do realize that if salisburyboy had his way hed put you towards the front of the line...

8/30/2007 11:32:30 PM

Oh, esgargs can't answer you, because one thread in Feedback Forum with no particular rationale for why he should be suspended succeded in bringing about his removal.

Whereas the several well-reasoned threads about why salisburyboy should be terminated are accomplishing zilch.

---

You know, I'm disgusted with myself for not noticing that in this of all threads some of you professed to enjoying salisburyboy's topics

This is how bad people accomplish bad things

[Edited on August 31, 2007 at 12:05 AM. Reason : ]

8/30/2007 11:55:55 PM

This thread is advocating murder and shows links to it...had this been

KKK lynches two blacks...yee haw!! die n---ers!!! (which this thread is pretty much the equivlent to)

the user would be suspended and thread locked immediately

8/31/2007 12:06:48 AM

theDuke866 was online earlier, long enough to post something in a chit chat thread of no import but apparently not long enough to do his job.

Now, look, I get it, Duke's a busy guy. Kid, the marines, all that. But it's not like Soap Box is a very demanding forum. There aren't a lot of threads in here, and there's rarely, if ever, any call for action to be taken regarding anything that happens here. I don't think it's too much to ask that he poke his head in here and feedback forum to see if there's anything out of the ordinary.

Of course, maybe he did see what was going on (he was online for a little while, even if he wasn't posting), and just thought, "Fuck it, I'm not in the mood to deal with this shit now."

Then there's the third possibility, that maybe he had a completely legitimate reason for being online and not moderating. For all I know he signed on, posted in chit chat, and was just about to check Soap Box when his baby shat all over the dog or something. If that's the case, ignore all of this.

But if it's either of the other two things you need to do one of two things. One, decide this moderating bullshit is something to pawn off to someone with more time on their hands. Two, do what has needed to be done for some time now. The thing we all wanted bad enough to start the series of events that ended with you becoming mod. The thing we've demanded ever since, increasingly over time, until this abomination of a thread brought things to a head: terminate this sack of snake shit. Eliminate him, and 90% of all the problems and complaints regarding the Soap Box go away, and all you have to concern yourself with is occasionally locking a repeat thread or moving a misplaced one. Never mind that it's the right thing to do.

8/31/2007 12:15:34 AM

^ If his kid shat on a dog..i'm impressed, my dog always runs away when i try to shi...um, never mind

8/31/2007 12:22:40 AM

JESUS

CHRIST

WHAT IS WRONG WITH SOME OF YOU KIDS

HAY LET ME GO ARGUE WITH PEOPLE ABOUT ARGUING ABOUT ONE PERSON OK HURRRRRRRRRR

ITS NOT THE FACT THAT HIS THREADS SUCK

OR THAT HE'S A SHITTY POSTER

OR THAT ALL THE DISCUSSIONS IN ALL OF HIS POSTS ARE EXCEEDINGLY ABOUT HOW SHITTY OF A POSTER HE IS

ITS THE FACT THAT SHIT LIKE THIS GETS TOLERATED

AND ENCOURAGED

BY FAGGOTS WITH THIS LINE OF THINKING : "If you don't like it don't click it ok!"

THAT MAKES 99% OF THE DISCUSSION HERE SUPER EXTREME! RETARDED (TM)

8/31/2007 12:31:55 AM

way to jump in on the faggot bandwagon with that one

8/31/2007 12:44:05 AM

i regret all the times I've defended Salisburyboy, even in this thread.

i just actually read his first post.

this is just ridiculous. he posted an execution video. and holds the act up as some sort of White People's Victory.

Fuck this shit.

Terminate him for real.

8/31/2007 1:19:35 AM

I would like to point out though that salisburyboy's views are almost in-line with backwoods NC:

Quote :

""Let 'em come legal. Those that are here illegal, shoot 'em. … Get 'em on a bus, do whatever, get rid of 'em," said Emell Coggens, a [Duplin county] resident."

http://abcnews.go.com/GMA/story?id=1771523&page=1

[Edited on August 31, 2007 at 1:38 AM. Reason : 1]

8/31/2007 1:38:29 AM

The video looks real to me. What a appalling way to execute a man. At least the shot to the head could be considered vaguely humane.

I agree posting a graphic murder video and considering the actions it contains to be legitimate is about as far as anyone can go.

8/31/2007 1:49:00 AM

^^ there are inbred fuckwits from every state in the nation, not just Duplin Co., NC. --- that doesn't mean we have to give them a forum here.

I've just officially changed parties. I was solidly in the "defend salisburyboy's right to post" camp until just now. I've quit. The fucker needs to go.

what salisburyboy has done here, has moved away from the realm of "expressing unpopular views" and has moved into the realm of conceivable investigations of hate crimes


^ the video IS real. the story made international news a week or so ago. call me naive, but i really didnt expect to find the video link here in TSB followed by glowing praise of the perpetrators. I guess in hindsight, i shouldnt ever be surprised by anything that happens here.





[Edited on August 31, 2007 at 1:53 AM. Reason : \/ oh, i know you weren't defending him. i was just following your train of thought]

8/31/2007 1:49:18 AM

I wasn't trying to defend SB.

I was just using the anti-SB momentum to propel my "screw rednecks" views

8/31/2007 1:52:09 AM

I don't believe in hate crimes, but I can't imagine much more twisted than watching a video of a Nazi sawing another man's head off and considering it a victory for your race.

The victims even look white to me. Racists are insane.

[Edited on August 31, 2007 at 1:57 AM. Reason : doom]

8/31/2007 1:54:54 AM

whether you believe in them or not doesnt matter .... hate crimes are routinely investigated and prosecuted.

and theoretically, the owners and/or moderators of TWW could be considered an accomplice.

I mean i don't think it would ever happen, but i'm just sayin' ... ya know?

8/31/2007 1:58:20 AM

You'd think they could at least do it with a blade large enough behead in a single cut.

The sawing is utterly hideous.

8/31/2007 2:04:56 AM

Good to see joe_schmoe has become one of us "peoples". For the record, what I object to is what has been pointed out from the beginning here. He is advocating the murder of innocents. This is not "war", this is debauchery. But to him they are not at all innocent,

Quote :

"And you want to call ILLEGAL immigrants who are invading countries just "immigrants" or "undocumented workers"? In reality, they are foreign invaders. And in the not-to-distant past when sanity reigned, foreign invaders could be shot on the spot...no questions asked."

In other words since they are not from the US their lives are worthless. (ok so he only referenced past actions with a clear sense of longing nostalgia but I think everybody here sees it for what it is ).
I'm all for disallowing non-citizens government services and for deporting criminals but to advocate that we murder them merely because they are not born here is just madness. Few if any of them intend us harm.

Free speech has limits, this is one of them. Advocating the murder of civilians is not acceptable nor should it be given any sort of forum by responsible adults. And don't even try to equate the intentional execution of "invaders" with the unintentional manslaughter of Iraqi nationals it's totally bogus.

I think salisburyboy wants to be terminated. Give him his wish, this thread is more than enough reason for it.

8/31/2007 3:24:52 AM

Quote :

"this thread crosses the line"

What line? Of being veeerrrry un-PC? Surely not calling for killing people....eg, it's PC and A-OK for people to call for "killing all Ayarabs" and "turning the mideast into a parking lot." Hell, some of you bastards have called for killing me. Where was the suspension for that?

Quote :

"I would like to point out though that salisburyboy's views are almost in-line with backwoods NC"

A lot of people in NC & the U.S. hold this exact same view (ie, that all illegals need to be shot on spot). The only thing is that very few of those would express that view in public...ie, have the courage of their convictions to say what they REALLY believe. I don't have that problem.

Quote :

"has moved into the realm of conceivable investigations of hate crimes"

LOL. You wish. This is protected speech (eg, remember that former NCSU black professor who called for killing all white people?).

Quote :

"and theoretically, the owners and/or moderators of TWW could be considered an accomplice"

Please. That's laughable.

Quote :

"Free speech has limits, this is one of them. Advocating the murder of civilians is not acceptable nor should it be given any sort of forum by responsible adults. And don't even try to equate the intentional execution of "invaders" with the unintentional manslaughter of Iraqi nationals it's totally bogus."

This is absolutely protected speech. And again, all I'm doing is identifying a DIFFERENT enemy...a REAL enemy and threat to the nation. The government and zioneocons say we can go across the globe and slaughter arabs/muslims who've done absolutely nothing to us because the government concocts a fraud/lie and says they are our "enemy." That could be called incitement to "murder" as well. But because the government sanctions that kind of killing (and "murder"), that makes it ok?

Quote :

"I'm simply advocating the defense of our nation against invasion by foreigners. If that means we must kill some of them, then so be it. But that's not "murder." What we are talking about here is justifiable use of force to repel invasion/attack, and defend the nation."

Regarding the legitimate use of deadly force to defend the nation...

Quote :

"If "The people" decide to enact change, then that change is "proper." It matters very little if such change is effectuated through an impossible labyrinth of political effort or is simply taken care of at street level."

We are supposed to have a government of "the people"...not a government of a cabal of elites ruling over us....using Third World invasion to weaken and destroy our society. What is the correct and justifiable action to be taken has no bearing upon whether the government officially sanctions it...and especially in our case where our government is openly criminal and waging war against its own citizenry. Our so-called government is completely illegitimate. It is not our legal government, because it does not represent or serve the people. If we want justice on the illegal invasion issue and many others, we are not going to get it through the government or peaceful political means. We the people must obtain it via other means.

8/31/2007 7:29:25 AM

WHY IS THIS GUY STILL HERE?

8/31/2007 7:33:50 AM

fuck you

can't deal with freedom of speech that shatters the politically correct worldview the establishment drilled into your feeble mind?

8/31/2007 7:38:42 AM

http://asheville.indymedia.org/article/107Clowns

8/31/2007 8:08:32 AM

ZOMG!1! PLZ CENSOR THAT EXTREMELY POLITICALLY INCORRECT SPEECH!11 IT OFFENDS ME GREATLY! AND IS "EXTREMIST" IN RELATION TO THE FLUFFY HAPPY POLITICALLY CORRECT PROPAGANDA THE JEWISH MEDIA & ESTABLISHMENT FORCE FEEDS ME!

JUST GO BACK TO TELLING ME HOW WE NEED TO NUKE IRAN AND KILL A BUNCH OF MUSLIMS! THAT'S MUCH MORE POLITICALLY CORRECT AND UNOFFENSIVE!1

8/31/2007 8:23:04 AM

How can you possible consider beheading a helpless man with a small knife to be a legitimate use of force? At best, it's unnecessarily brutal execution technique designed to terrorize.

[Edited on August 31, 2007 at 11:16 AM. Reason : d]

8/31/2007 11:16:01 AM

Quote :

"A lot of people in NC & the U.S. hold this exact same view (ie, that all illegals need to be shot on spot). The only thing is that very few of those would express that view in public...ie, have the courage of their convictions to say what they REALLY believe. I don't have that problem. "

You're probably right, but the majority of those people are extremely uneducated, and have a poor perspective of how the world works. You're in good company there, right?

And this has nothing to do with "political correctness." You seem to be a big fan of doing what the people want, and the people here seem to want you gone, so what's your problem? Why don't you bypass our leadership system, and do the will of the people on your own? It would be the perfect way to show how the gov. SHOULD work, wouldn't it?

8/31/2007 2:16:38 PM

Seems like there would be a lot more blood (if the video was real)

[Edited on August 31, 2007 at 2:19 PM. Reason : .]

8/31/2007 2:19:07 PM

Uh, there was quite a bit of blood.

How much were you expecting?

8/31/2007 4:38:44 PM

a lot

8/31/2007 4:41:06 PM

Salisburyboy is obviously a Jew in disguise. He is trying to entrap innocent whites into performing these acts by pretending he is on their side.

8/31/2007 5:52:23 PM

salis...so there are people here who you dont like...do you think we should take them all into the woods and behead them??

yes or no??

8/31/2007 6:28:41 PM

Ok. This is finally enough.

Haven't done it for last few days because internet was barely/not at all working at my house.

8/31/2007 9:20:31 PM