Rosen was pulled yesterday in the blow out. Glennon went 10/14 111 yards, 1 TD.
12/17/2018 9:27:46 PM
Rosen got the absolute shit beat out of him yesterday.
12/17/2018 10:14:44 PM
https://packinsider.com/2019/03/24/mike-glennon-signs-with-oakland-raiders/
3/27/2019 12:34:02 PM
He has made almost $35,000 per pass attempt in his career. That's pretty sweet.
3/27/2019 12:49:59 PM
Yeah worse ways to make a living. Don't know that he would have ever been a viable long term starter but he did basically catch every worst possible break at pretty much every stop on his career.Bad coaching and constantly switching QBs around his first two yearsBucs then Draft Jameis.Signed with Chicago for them to go draft Trubisky within like a month, played in the year before the Bears upgraded a bunch of positions.First round QB drafted in AZ.Watch the raiders draft a QB now too.
3/27/2019 1:13:55 PM
If his receivers could catch he would have been 2-2 with Chicago, and probably starts another game or two (next game trubisky had 2 turnovers in a 20-17 L, who knows, might have been 3-2)
3/27/2019 5:15:37 PM
6/3/2020 6:03:36 PM
Mike Glennon:
6/3/2020 6:05:56 PM
having a good game today vs cleveland
11/29/2020 2:55:57 PM
2 tds so far in this first start since 2017
11/29/2020 3:09:53 PM
He got the nod to start against Minnesota this weekend as well.
12/2/2020 11:17:40 AM
12/19/2021 10:18:13 PM
1/3/2022 1:32:20 PM
QBR is a terrible metricI mean that doesn't really apply here, but it needs to be said every time QBR is mentioned.
1/3/2022 3:23:34 PM
better than QB rating, tho
1/3/2022 3:52:32 PM
It's really not though
1/3/2022 3:54:01 PM
a metric that factors in QB rush yards is better than one that doesn’t in 2022[Edited on January 3, 2022 at 4:54 PM. Reason : .]
1/3/2022 4:42:44 PM
Neither are particularly good, but i will take the one that has a known formula over the one that ESPN has kept proprietary and has changed multiple times over the years in order to promote certain players. Also, as it currently stands QBR puts a ridiculous amount of weight on rushing stats, to the point that passing is almost inconsequential to QBR if the guy runs for 80 yards. Just remember, there was a time when Charlie Batch and Jamarcus Russell were at the top of the all time QBR list. ESPN changed the formula once that became known to the public, just like they change it to fit whatever narrative they are currently pushing.I'd much rather look at average yards per attempt + some rushing stats to determine who is good.
1/4/2022 12:50:08 PM
^using your method who would be top 5 QB in the league?
1/4/2022 12:56:47 PM
^^ QBR, like every other stat, works better with more data, so it’s silly to point to a one-game outlier to demean the metricI know that you know this, but you’re being performative just to be performative [Edited on January 4, 2022 at 1:24 PM. Reason : .]
1/4/2022 1:13:01 PM
Top 5 QB’s in QBR:RodgersBrady HerbertStaffordMahomesTop 5 QB’s in QB Rating:RodgersBurrowStaffordWilsonCousins
1/4/2022 1:38:31 PM
QBR is stupid and was made up by ESPN for marketing/promoting their own bullshit.QB Rating is a statistic created to rank quarterbacks players whose main responsibility is passing the ball.
1/4/2022 2:26:11 PM
Kind of surprised if qbr puts more emphasis on running, brady is on and mahomes and wilson not on, but then on the other stat that doesn’t take into account running as muchI def like first list more than 2nd. Stafford still overrated though. Cousins… Oh wait mahomes on qbr one. Is herbert considered legit bonafide good yet? Or just having good year? [Edited on January 4, 2022 at 2:49 PM. Reason : .]
1/4/2022 2:45:11 PM
Herbert is legit, so is Burrow. Neither are terrible lists. Wilson looks out of place because he missed so many games, but the stats are for "average" performance, not cumulative season stats.
1/4/2022 2:51:19 PM
1/4/2022 3:36:19 PM
1/4/2022 3:55:01 PM
Seems like dvoa or whatever that stat isn’t good. Panthers always do good in it and suck
1/4/2022 4:24:20 PM
Lol you posted a response on quora from a guy who works for ESPN. Really gonna change my mind with that completely unbiased opinion. The only possible way i will ever give half a thought to QBR as a useful stat is if ESPN actually publishes the formula for it and how each variable is calculated. Because right now it sure seems like it's some dudes arbitrarily assigning values to plays.An advanced stat that no one (outside ESPN) knows the way it is calculated is useless. All it tells you is what an incredibly biased source thinks is the answer.]
1/4/2022 9:21:06 PM
how has it been used as a marketing tool to push a specific narrative?
1/4/2022 9:32:32 PM
Can we please get an accurate top 5?
1/5/2022 12:28:58 AM
^^^ that's just kind of a dumb reason not to like QBR in my opinion. If you disagree with the results, that's one thing, but to just blindly not trust it because "I cAnT sEe wHaTs gOiNg On!1!" is dumb.Tell me, do you trust KenPom in basketball? Cause it's the exact same scenario -- "magic box" spits out numbers, proprietary formula no one knows, the whole works.
1/5/2022 8:09:04 AM
I think the difference is that KP isn’t a multi-billion dollar media organization like ESPN. That feels like a distinct difference. I don’t fully agree with Justin (he does have a point imo).
1/5/2022 8:37:04 AM
That's a fair distinction but I don't think ESPN exactly makes money off QBR. They get clicks and ad revenue from their articles about it and whatnot but AFAIK it's a free stat to use.
1/5/2022 10:08:04 AM
While on the topic of Mike Glennon flawed ESPN stats, their FPI spits out some weird results too. Seems like Mississippi State was preseason top 10 this year.
1/5/2022 10:29:06 AM
Well they beat us and we undisputedly won 10 games, so that checks out
1/5/2022 10:45:05 AM
http://twitter.com/fbgchase/status/1482561226701955073
1/15/2022 11:21:49 PM
Oh we back (kinda)
1/4/2023 1:16:55 PM
OH WE BACK
1/4/2023 4:01:57 PM